Hi Jacques, Dan,
I believe your positions are not that far apart.
Jacques suggested to create a 23.09 branch which would happen in
September 2023 and gives us 9 weeks from now. Dan suggested at least 4
weeks to stabilize trunk before creating the branch.
I agree with you both: let's
Let's see what others think ;)
Le 28/07/2023 à 17:47, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
I would like to see a delay of at least 4 weeks to give interested parties
a chance to exercise the parts of OFBiz they are most familiar with.
I'm happy to be challenged on this, though. Choosing a
I'm actually routinely backporting fixes to both branches (18 and 22).
Most of the time it's easy, but with moved groovy files it will be really more
work.
Le 28/07/2023 à 17:53, Daniel Watford a écrit :
I'm not familiar with that bug, but I am of the opinion that branch 22.01
is abandoned,
I'm not familiar with that bug, but I am of the opinion that branch 22.01
is abandoned, therefore there is no target branch to backport a bug to.
We also are not accepting bug fixes into the 18 branch - Perhaps this is a
decision we should reconsidered since it means we have no path to migrate
Hi Jacques,
I would like to see a delay of at least 4 weeks to give interested parties
a chance to exercise the parts of OFBiz they are most familiar with.
I'm happy to be challenged on this, though. Choosing a reasonable amount of
time is a balance between duplicating work when resources are
Also please consider these comments: https://s.apache.org/fcpi3
Le 28/07/2023 à 17:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Daniel,
Ho many time do you think we need?
Maybe a month is indeed short. Though actually the changes are pretty simple
and we should not cross much issues
Le 28/07/2023 à
Hi Daniel,
Ho many time do you think we need?
Maybe a month is indeed short. Though actually the changes are pretty simple
and we should not cross much issues
Le 28/07/2023 à 17:17, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
Apologies if I've misunderstood your meaning, but I don't think we
Hi Jacques,
Apologies if I've misunderstood your meaning, but I don't think we should
rush to create a 23.xx branch.
Following such a large refactor, we are likely to find issues in our use of
groovy scripts over the coming weeks. If we go ahead and create a new 23.xx
branch from trunk too soon
Le 03/05/2023 à 09:45, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel Watford wrote:
[...]
I'll ask one more question (and then run for cover!): Rather than carry out
this work twice. What if we abandon the 22.01 release and instead make a
new release branch (23.xx) soon
