Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-06 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish > the first release from the "release13.07" branch. > For a description of release naming and strategy see > http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html > >

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-02 Thread Anahita Goljahani
+1 Tests were successful on Windows 7 64 bit with Java 1.7 Kind regards Anahita 2014-10-01 8:41 GMT+02:00 Jacopo Cappellato : > This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish > the first release from the "release13.07" branch. > For a description of release naming

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+1 Jacques Le 01/10/2014 08:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish the first release from the "release13.07" branch. For a description of release naming and strategy see http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html The release file

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Nicolas Malin
Le 01/10/2014 18:10, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : It is a bit manual process but in my Mac I run: md5 apache-ofbiz-13.07.01.zip and get the output: MD5 (apache-ofbiz-13.07.01.zip) = 2fcba7b4e7cfafe424c90bbffa2e8dc2 I then compare it with the content of apache-ofbiz-13.07.01.zip.md5 which is: apac

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Oct 1, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote: > On : > Linux 3.11.0-26 SMP x86_64 > java version "1.7.0_65", Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.65-b04, > mixed mode) > > * run-tests OK > * signature gpg control OK > > For sha and md5 maybe I don't use the good process : > $ sha1su

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Nicolas Malin
On : Linux 3.11.0-26 SMP x86_64 java version "1.7.0_65", Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode) * run-tests OK * signature gpg control OK For sha and md5 maybe I don't use the good process : $ sha1sum -c apache-ofbiz-13.07.01.zip.sha sha1sum: apache-ofbiz-13.07.01.zip.

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Anil K Patel
+1 Thanks and Regards Anil Patel COO Hotwax Media Inc http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/ ApacheCon US 2014 Silver Sponsor http://na.apachecon.com/sponsor/our-sponsors Sent from my iPad > On Oct 1, 2014, at 2:41 AM, Jacopo Cappellato > wrote: > > This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vot

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Scott Gray
+1 Regards Scott On 1/10/2014, at 7:41 pm, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish > the first release from the "release13.07" branch. > For a description of release naming and strategy see > http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html >

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Pierre Smits
-1, given the controversy about this release and the components included in the Special Purpose stack. The discussion started before the freeze of 13.07.01 and many community members (even PMC members) were against the exclusion of a lot of components. That discussion didn't result in a consensus.

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
+1 -- Kind Regards, Ashish Vijaywargiya On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish > the first release from the "release13.07" branch. > For a description of release naming

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Pranay Pandey
+1 Pranay Pandey HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com ApacheCon US 2014 Silver Sponsor http://na.apachecon.com/sponsor/our-sponsors On Oct 1, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish > the first release from

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-10-01 Thread Deepak Dixit
+1 Thanks & Regards — Deepak Dixit On Oct 1, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish > the first release from the "release13.07" branch. > For a description of release naming and strategy see > http://ofbiz.apac

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01 (2nd)

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is the (second, after the first was cancelled) vote thread to publish the first release from the "release13.07" branch. For a description of release naming and strategy see http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/di

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-09-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Good catch Deepak, it's fixed Jacques Le 30/09/2014 10:57, Deepak Dixit a écrit : Open ticket for the issue and attached patch for the fix. Here is the link for ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5789 Thanks & Regards — Deepak Dixit On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Jacopo Cappell

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-09-30 Thread Deepak Dixit
Open ticket for the issue and attached patch for the fix. Here is the link for ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5789 Thanks & Regards — Deepak Dixit On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > ouch... thanks for catching this Deepak! > > Let's cancel this vote f

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
ouch... thanks for catching this Deepak! Let's cancel this vote for now. Jacopo On Sep 30, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Deepak Dixit wrote: > -1 > > ecommerce is broken on release13.07 branch, "ReferenceError: jQuery is not > defined” error occurred on js console. It might be due to query library >

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-09-30 Thread Deepak Dixit
-1 ecommerce is broken on release13.07 branch, "ReferenceError: jQuery is not defined” error occurred on js console. It might be due to query library update, Need to fix the js path for ecommerce component. Thanks & Regards — Deepak Dixit On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrot

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is the vote thread to publish the first release from the "release13.07" branch. For a description of release naming and strategy see http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-

[CANCEL] [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-03-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The vote has been cancelled in order to fix some of the issues that have been reported (at least, because it is preventing the tests to pass, the DST issue reported by Jacques and analyzed/fixed by Christian). I am going to prepare a new set of candidate release files soon and then I will start

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-03-22 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Christian, thank you for digging into this issue. I would actually prefer to cancel this vote, and prepare a new set of release files and then start again. Jacopo On Mar 23, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Christian Geisert wrote: > Am 23.03.2014 00:09, schrieb Christian Geisert: >> Am 22.03.2014 20:48, sc

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-03-22 Thread Christian Geisert
Am 23.03.2014 00:09, schrieb Christian Geisert: > Am 22.03.2014 20:48, schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >> +0 (miss below ;) >> >> MD5 OK >> >> Failure in run tests in Windows 7 >> >> production-run-tests.testProductionRunDateChangeFailure Assertion >> failed: ([taskTimeDifference=-360.0] equals 0.

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-03-22 Thread Pierre Smits
-1 For the following reasons: 1) The issues as described in OFBIZ-4130 and OFBIZ-5319 are not resolved. Given that the main issue (4130) is now more than 3 years old without being addressed and the second more than 6 months old. Not addressing such a security issue for reasons like 'i don't exper

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-03-22 Thread Christian Geisert
Am 22.03.2014 20:48, schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > +0 (miss below ;) > > MD5 OK > > Failure in run tests in Windows 7 > > production-run-tests.testProductionRunDateChangeFailure Assertion > failed: ([taskTimeDifference=-360.0] equals 0.0 as Double OR > [taskTimeDifference=-360.0] equals

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-03-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+0 (miss below ;) MD5 OK Failure in run tests in Windows 7 production-run-tests.testProductionRunDateChangeFailure Assertion failed: ([taskTimeDifference=-360.0] equals 0.0 as Double OR [taskTimeDifference=-360.0] equals 1.0 as Double OR [taskTimeDifference=-360.0] equals -1.0

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.01

2014-03-20 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is the vote thread to approve the first release for the 13.07 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 13.07.01" (major release number: "13.07"; minor release number: "01") is the first release of the 13.07 series and contains all the features of the trunk up to July 2013, stabilized with bu