Re: Files w/o licenses

Khurana Technical Consultant HotWax Systems On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jacques Le Roux wrote: Done. Here we go, there were: Unapproved Licenses: 1. /home/buildslave/slave/ofbizTrunkFrameworkRat/build/applications/accounting/groovyScripts/test/AutoAcctgInvoiceTests.groovy

Re: Files w/o licenses

Thanks Jacques for taking care of this. -- Best Regards, Suraj Khurana Technical Consultant HotWax Systems On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Done. > > Here we go, there were: > > > Unapproved Licenses: > > 1. > /home/buildslave/s

Re: Files w/o licenses

Done. Here we go, there were: Unapproved Licenses: 1. /home/buildslave/slave/ofbizTrunkFrameworkRat/build/applications/accounting/groovyScripts/test/AutoAcctgInvoiceTests.groovy 2. /home/buildslave/slave/ofbizTrunkFrameworkRat/build/applications/order/groovyScripts/test

Re: Files w/o licenses

Damn, I hope I'm not one of them ;) Le 03/06/2019 à 10:04, Scott Gray a écrit : I hope you'll name the reviewers that missed them as well :-) On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 07:33, Jacques Le Roux wrote: OK, I'll do it in a week if nobody beats me on it. But I'll name those that should have done it

Re: Files w/o licenses

I hope you'll name the reviewers that missed them as well :-) On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 07:33, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > OK, I'll do it in a week if nobody beats me on it. > > But I'll name those that should have done it before :p > > Jacques > > Le 28/05/2019 à 14:49, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >

Re: Files w/o licenses

Jacques Le Roux writes: > OK, I'll do it in a week if nobody beats me on it. > > But I'll name those that should have done it before :p Shame! :-) -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37

Re: Files w/o licenses

OK, I'll do it in a week if nobody beats me on it. But I'll name those that should have done it before :p Jacques Le 28/05/2019 à 14:49, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Committers, Please guys make an effort: https://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/rat-output.html I normally do it (add missing

Re: Files w/o licenses

I asked, it was possible but hard then to do from RAT (Creadur TLP now). Maybe it enhanced... Le 28/05/2019 à 15:27, Pierre Smits a écrit : Should the ci not raise such issues? Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory

Re: Files w/o licenses

Should the ci not raise such issues? Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory , PMC Member* Apache Incubator , committer *Apache OFBiz ,

Files w/o licenses

Hi Committers, Please guys make an effort: https://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/rat-output.html I normally do it (add missing licences) but the RAT build was off for months and they piled up (OK now as it specifically depends on lares_ubuntu Buildbot server:

Re: [selenium-developers] Licenses issues in selenium-rc

. Apache Foundation rules are very stricts about licenses (http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html), and when looking inside the selenium-rc jar, some files are not graduating for inclusion. A long time ago, these issue was created inside our jira instance : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [selenium-developers] Licenses issues in selenium-rc

are regularly asking the same question about license on selenium rc, in order to integrate the jar into our project. Apache Foundation rules are very stricts about licenses (http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html), and when looking inside the selenium-rc jar, some files are not graduating

Licenses issues in selenium-rc

Hi all, For the Apache OFBiz project (ofbiz.apache.org), we are regularly asking the same question about license on selenium rc, in order to integrate the jar into our project. Apache Foundation rules are very stricts about licenses (http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html), and when looking

Re: [selenium-developers] Licenses issues in selenium-rc

cssQuery is licensed under LGPL - migration to sizzle would do the trick ... The sizzle issue has already been created : http://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=336 Yay!! +1000! Santi

Licenses

Hi devs, FYI, in case you had not the chance to see in mail here is an interesting link http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Maybe we could put a link somewhere in our Wiki (ideas where ?) and even on the site ? Thanks Jacques