Good point, thanks!
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/29/2014 5:26 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Nov 28, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
wrote:
1. Check with the ASF legal department before doing anything.
You can do step #1
Le 29/11/2014 06:26, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Nov 28, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
wrote:
1. Check with the ASF legal department before doing anything.
You can do step #1 without any approval from the ASF or the OFBiz project.
2. Create a project
Yes, I do have interest in asset maintenance application and I like the idea
and direction proposed by Adrian.
With time I will figure out ways to support this experiment.
Anil Patel.
On Nov 29, 2014, at 4:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Le 29/11/2014
As has been discussed in this thread, we can spin off special purpose
components to their own projects - where they can form their own
communities and support structure.
I am willing to use the Asset Maintenance component as a trial run. Here
are some of my initial thoughts, comments are
No need to fork the project. Let's keep it within Apache.
On 28/11/2014 11:20 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
As has been discussed in this thread, we can spin off special purpose
components to their own projects - where they can form their own
communities and support structure.
I am willing to use
Hi Adrian,
Sounds like a good plan to me. I think there should probably be some sort
of a delay in step #5 and it should ultimately be decided by a PMC vote at
that point in time as well. I totally support the concept though.
Regards
Scott
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Adrian Crum
Don't forget to get ICLAs and Corporate CLAs for the new site for each
contributor otherwise you will have trouble if you want to submit it to
Apache OFBiz in the future.
I guess that if you offer it under an Apache license without having an
ICLA /CCLA in place, you would be personally liable
OFBiz itself went through that on a much larger scale when joining the ASF.
It took some time but it wasn't a big deal.
No users are forced to do anything other than make a choice: stick with
what you have or change to what is now available. Open source users make
these types of decisions on a
On 28/11/2014 9:38 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
OFBiz itself went through that on a much larger scale when joining the ASF.
It took some time but it wasn't a big deal.
No users are forced to do anything other than make a choice: stick with
what you have or change to what is now available. Open source
Yeah I understood that. Deleting simply means it won't be available in
future releases. It wouldn't suddenly disappear out of pre-existing
releases.
Regards
Scott
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2014 9:38 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 28/11/2014 10:14 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Yeah I understood that. Deleting simply means it won't be available
in future releases. It wouldn't suddenly disappear out of
pre-existing releases.
Got it.
Regards
Scott
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Ron Wheeler
On Nov 28, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
wrote:
1. Check with the ASF legal department before doing anything.
You can do step #1 without any approval from the ASF or the OFBiz project.
2. Create a project on a popular hosting site (like SourceForge, but it
12 matches
Mail list logo
