Re: Proposal to back port some changes to 13.07

2013-09-17 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Thank you all for your feedback: I have backported the changes in revisions 1523916 and 1523924 Jacopo On Sep 13, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: Hi all, I would like to backport to the new 13.07 branch some changes recently committed to the

Re: Proposal to back port some changes to 13.07

2013-09-14 Thread Anil Patel
+1 Thanks and Regards Anil Patel Hotwax Media Inc http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/ ApacheCon US 2013 Gold Sponsor http://na.apachecon.com/sponsors/ On Sep 13, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: Hi all, I would like to backport to the new 13.07 branch

Proposal to back port some changes to 13.07

2013-09-13 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, I would like to backport to the new 13.07 branch some changes recently committed to the trunk (that are not bug fixes): a) Revisions: 1518925 (and the related minor 151, 1520319, 1520321, 1520326, 1520509) Moved Lucene dependent code out of applications b) Revision 1520510,

Re: Proposal to back port some changes to 13.07

2013-09-13 Thread Adrian Crum
Generally speaking, I am in favor of backporting recent refactorings to the most recent branch - mainly because it makes it easier to keep the branch updated. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 9/13/2013 12:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, I would like to

Re: Proposal to back port some changes to 13.07

2013-09-13 Thread Pierre Smits
+1 I agree. The release is not available yet to the general public and such improvement are important enough to incorporate now (in stead of waiting for the next opportune moment) and ease the future work. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based

Re: Proposal to back port some changes to 13.07

2013-09-13 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I don't see a big risk at backporting those. Moreover Lucene changes includes fixes +1 Jacques Pierre Smits wrote: +1 I agree. The release is not available yet to the general public and such improvement are important enough to incorporate now (in stead of waiting for the next opportune