Re: Update: Mini-language Overhaul

2012-07-03 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Adrian, Not sure if this is the best place for it but I noticed today that call-service handles service errors a bit differently from the service engine itself. In ServiceDispatcher.runSync(), the service returned an error if:

Re: Update: Mini-language Overhaul

2012-07-03 Thread Scott Gray
Please ignore, I was completely wrong :-) Regards Scott On 3/07/2012, at 11:37 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Adrian, Not sure if this is the best place for it but I noticed today that call-service handles service errors a bit differently from the service engine itself. In

Re: Update: Mini-language Overhaul

2012-07-03 Thread Adrian Crum
No worries. I appreciate your review. Btw, I'm currently working on getting Mini-language unit tests started. I will be making an initial commit that will contain only a few tests, but at least it's a start and we can build them out over time. -Adrian On 7/3/2012 12:51 PM, Scott Gray wrote:

Re: Update: Mini-language Overhaul

2012-07-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Adrian, I will try to find some time to review again the document but in the meantime I would like to thank you for all the work you did on this overhaul. Regards, Jacopo On Jul 2, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: The Mini-language Reference has reached the final draft status - with the

Update: Mini-language Overhaul

2012-07-02 Thread Adrian Crum
The Mini-language Reference has reached the final draft status - with the exception of the Map Processor section. I am running out of time to work on the overhaul, so I am skipping that section for now. https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/mini-language-reference.html Please take some time to

Re: Update: Mini-language Overhaul

2012-07-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I did not review details, but really quite a steady work Adrian, appreciated at its real value! I hope it will not be used to drop minilang in favour of only a Groovy DSL though. I think the minilang can stay, and people used to it continue to use and appreciate its quality. Then maybe time