De : "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The release4.0 branch needs testing, and that is the point of this
> > thread. Of course there are bugs or issues, finding them and the
> > nature of them is the point of doing this. You're right that these
>
Hmm. I didn't think about this, that we shouldn't release for sake of getting attention. It's true
that it is irritating to end-users if we release something not functional. OFBiz 4.0 is
functional. I haven't found any show-stopping bugs.
The reason for the release, IHMO, isn't to get attention
Call me reckless, but I don't think that bug should block binary release. As mentioned before,
obsolete a bad release if we need to. I'll be testing the framework a lot over the coming month,
so we might see another binary release if I happen to dig up enough critical bugs.
As the release branc
De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The release4.0 branch needs testing, and that is the point of this
> thread. Of course there are bugs or issues, finding them and the
> nature of them is the point of doing this. You're right that these
> exist and need attention. Whether they should block
Thanks Shi,
This is really the kind of feedbacks we need...
Jacques
De : "Shi Yusen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We have 2 programmers developing components on 4.0 branch for 4 months
> and never heard any bugs found until now. The specialpurpose, eCommerce,
> content, manufacturing are the components
I'd suggest to move all the i18n files outside the framework except the
defaults, only well qualified programmers can touch the code.
Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd.
在 2007-11-26一的 13:22 -0700，David E Jones写道：
> The release4.0 branch needs testing, and that is the point of this
> thread. Of cou
We have 2 programmers developing components on 4.0 branch for 4 months
and never heard any bugs found until now. The specialpurpose, eCommerce,
content, manufacturing are the components we didn't touch.
BTW, we have started to integrate jbpm with the 4.0 branch.
Regards,
Shi Yusen/Beijing Langh
But +1 for what reason?
We will NOT release this just to get attention. We will release it
when there is at least a small consensus that it is ready.
-David
On Nov 26, 2007, at 1:19 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
+1 beta
probably the only way it will ever get any attention.
David E Jones sent t
The release4.0 branch needs testing, and that is the point of this
thread. Of course there are bugs or issues, finding them and the
nature of them is the point of doing this. You're right that these
exist and need attention. Whether they should block a binary release
is another question a
+1 beta
probably the only way it will ever get any attention.
David E Jones sent the following on 11/26/2007 11:44 AM:
>
> On Nov 26, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> BTW I think the time is coming to answer questions like in
>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Demo+and+Test+
as per the bug found today on
Re: HtmlWidget missing a MapStack pop?
there are bugs and ver 40 needs a good test.
per the commit on this bug
Ver 4.0 was not updated.
:(
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 11/26/2007 11:52 AM:
> Frankly speaking, my interest for the release branch is low, I'v
Frankly speaking, my interest for the release branch is low, I've not
tested it too much and I usually suggest to clients to build their
fortune on the trunk.
That said it would be great to release it, if there is consensus from
the community.
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at
On Nov 26, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
BTW I think the time is coming to answer questions like in
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Demo+and+Test+Setup+Guide?focusedCommentId=2604#comment-2604
What to you think, you developpers ?
I think first things first...
The first que
13 matches
Mail list logo
