Hi Taher,
It's in the LEGAL-296 Jira issue reference below
Jacques
Le 18/04/2017 à 11:19, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
Can you refer to the discussion thread and / or JIRA issue in which Marvin
and Shane mentioned this info (if it is public) so we can learn and
understand the legal
Hi Jacques,
Can you refer to the discussion thread and / or JIRA issue in which Marvin
and Shane mentioned this info (if it is public) so we can learn and
understand the legal basis of this decision?
Regards,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
OFBIZ-9323 wait for your reviews
Thanks
Jacques
Le 16/04/2017 à 10:17, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 16/04/2017 à 09:57, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
So we need to also remove things from the controller, BirtScreens.xml and
BirtMenus.xml. I believe we also need to prune web.xml.
It seems to
Le 16/04/2017 à 09:57, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
So we need to also remove things from the controller, BirtScreens.xml and
BirtMenus.xml. I believe we also need to prune web.xml.
It seems to me that we need to remove the attachments folder And the
server-config.wsdd. I see no usage left of
Marvin and Shane think that this file should not be delivered with OFBiz
releases. I agree and will remove it.
I see then no ways to save the usage of the ChartReport.ftl and Report.ftl which rely on birt.tld. Hence the *HTML* demo reports associated need to be
removed (PDF demos are OK).
So
I reopened LEGAL-296
Jacques
Le 13/04/2017 à 22:42, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Yes it's indeed possible that we keep it. It's only 1 file, a bit more editable than a DTD and not really a standard, but kind of in the Birt
ecosystem.
I tend to agree with Marvin
Yes it's indeed possible that we keep it. It's only 1 file, a bit more editable
than a DTD and not really a standard, but kind of in the Birt ecosystem.
I tend to agree with Marvin
I'm not an quite sure (I'm always bad with legalese) , but would this not
qualify as category B [1] kind of source? It's a tag library needed at
runtime as mentioned in the "Viewer Tag Library" header in [2]. Are we
using the viewer for that matter or did we remove it completely?
[1]
It seems there are no other files in birt component concerned by the licensing
issue
Jacques
Le 13/04/2017 à 18:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
While working on HELP_BIRT.xml, I have found another issue regarding the birt
component and the Birt license (EPL v1)
It's said at
Hi,
While working on HELP_BIRT.xml, I have found another issue regarding the birt
component and the Birt license (EPL v1)
It's said at
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl/notice.php
that all source maintained in the Birt repository is licensed under EPL v1
The birt.tld file we use to render
10 matches
Mail list logo
