Adrian Crum wrote:
> David E Jones wrote:
>> On Dec 28, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Ean Schuessler"
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Thanks, I saw that but was not sure how to use it. I remember now
> why I
> created Java services. I needed to create a PartyGrou
David E Jones wrote:
> The original idea was to use this as an extra protection, ie so users don't
> describe a party's relationship with something else using a certain role if
> the party isn't really in that role.
>
> The result, however, is that it is cumbersome, a real pain, and a common
>
From: "Adrian Crum"
David E Jones wrote:
On Dec 28, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Ean Schuessler"
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks, I saw that but was not sure how to use it. I remember now why I
created Java services. I needed to create a PartyGroup. So initially I
looked f
David E Jones wrote:
On Dec 28, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Ean Schuessler"
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks, I saw that but was not sure how to use it. I remember now why I
created Java services. I needed to create a PartyGroup. So initially I
looked for a service and found
On Dec 28, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: "Ean Schuessler"
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Thanks, I saw that but was not sure how to use it. I remember now why I
>>> created Java services. I needed to create a PartyGroup. So initially I
>>> looked for a service and found createP
From: "Ean Schuessler"
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks, I saw that but was not sure how to use it. I remember now why I
created Java services. I needed to create a PartyGroup. So initially I
looked for a service and found createPartyGroup wich is implemented by a
method in PartyServices.java. The
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Thanks, I saw that but was not sure how to use it. I remember now why I
> created Java services. I needed to create a PartyGroup. So initially I
> looked for a service and found createPartyGroup wich is implemented by a
> method in PartyServices.java. Then I continued in Ja
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "David E Jones"
The reason to use SECAs is to avoid changing the current service. All you need to do is have another service run before the
PartyRelationship create/update services that checks to see if there is a PartyRole record and if not create it. In fact, I
From: "David E Jones"
The reason to use SECAs is to avoid changing the current service. All you need to do is have another service run before the
PartyRelationship create/update services that checks to see if there is a PartyRole record and if not create it. In fact, I
believe there is already
The reason to use SECAs is to avoid changing the current service. All you need
to do is have another service run before the PartyRelationship create/update
services that checks to see if there is a PartyRole record and if not create
it. In fact, I believe there is already a service that does th
Hi David,
I had a fresh look, I agree it can be easily written with simple-methods instead. I don't think I need SECAs, but I'm not quite sure
right about that yet.
I will rewrite it (notably the helpers are pretty useless). I was coding in Java and thought Java, so I forgot about the comfort
m
Thanks for reviewing Scott,
From: "Scott Gray"
Hi Jacques,
I haven't reviewed the actual logic but a few comments inline.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 27/12/2009, at 12:21 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sat Dec 26 11:21:21 2009
New Revision
From: "David E Jones"
Thanks for your review Scott.
There really are a lot of issues with this commit...
Nothing harmful though (or I did not spot it in)
From a higher level perspective, why is this implemented with so much code and so many new files? I think all that is needed to
implemen
Thanks for your review Scott.
There really are a lot of issues with this commit...
>From a higher level perspective, why is this implemented with so much code and
>so many new files? I think all that is needed to implement this functionality
>is a service definition, simple-method service impl
Hi Jacques,
I haven't reviewed the actual logic but a few comments inline.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 27/12/2009, at 12:21 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sat Dec 26 11:21:21 2009
New Revision: 893961
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=89
15 matches
Mail list logo
