Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Scott Gray
On 30/03/2010, at 2:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Anyway if you really feel it should be removed go ahead. It's not a big deal > for now, only an experiment. Thanks Jacques, done in r929256 Regards Scott > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Well that makes it a little difficult to determine how useful

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Scott, I already tried a notice from the user mailing list. I got some answers then http://ofbiz.uservoice.com/forums/45214-general but not much (almost any) answers after this moment. I did any notices in user ML but got already one answer from main page. I'd just like to see how it will go for

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Scott Gray
Well that makes it a little difficult to determine how useful it was being. I would still like to see it removed from the main page for now. Why not just create a wiki page with an overview of the tool's purpose and link to it from that? You could point people to it in mailing list discussion

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
There are anything in ideascale because I cleaned it before putting the link from home page Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" Actually I already tried 2 tools from user ML http://markmail.org/message/dfwmoj45cgojgp5d I chose ideascale because it allows negative votes Jacques From: "Jacopo Ca

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Actually I already tried 2 tools from user ML http://markmail.org/message/dfwmoj45cgojgp5d I chose ideascale because it allows negative votes Jacques From: "Jacopo Cappellato" On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Jacopo, Scott, What kind of issues do you fear? Actually no

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Scott Gray
My opinion is strong, I think it should be removed. Things I don't like: - as far as I can tell there has been no activity on the site, even though it has been almost 3 weeks since you first mentioned it - you've received no positive comments from any other committers as far as I am aware - the

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Jacopo, Scott, > > What kind of issues do you fear? Actually no fear nor issues: just a bit of confusion. And also it seems to me more natural to test a tool "internally" (i.e. in the dev list) and if we like it then make it official and pu

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Jacopo, Scott, What kind of issues do you fear? Jacques Scott Gray wrote: I would prefer to keep it off the main page until the community proves that it is something they want by using it, at that point we could consider making it an official resource. I don't want the main page to be a pro

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Scott Gray
I would prefer to keep it off the main page until the community proves that it is something they want by using it, at that point we could consider making it an official resource. I don't want the main page to be a proving ground for ideas that may or may not work out. Regards Scott On 30/03/2

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Actually I'd want to measure what happens from the main site. If there are nothing of few changes it will not be worth to create something in OFBiz. In one month or so we should have an idea about that. Jacques From: "Jacopo Cappellato" Understood. What if, in this testing phase, we remove th

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Understood. What if, in this testing phase, we remove the reference from the official page of the project and just point to it when needed in conversation in the lists? Jacopo On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Yes that's why I was reluctant to do it. I don't

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jacopo, Yes that's why I was reluctant to do it. I don't expect much of it. As I said it's much a test than anything else. If it proves useful we could develop something specific for that based on Survey. I think that Ruth is already using Survey on her site. Jacques From: "Jacopo Cappella

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Scott Gray
+1 Regards Scott On 30/03/2010, at 6:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > it seems interesting but I feel like we should try to avoid (whenever > possible) to base our community processes and workflows on resources that are > not part of the ASF. > > My 2 cents, > > Jacopo > >

Re: svn commit: r929073 - /ofbiz/site/index.html

2010-03-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Jacques, it seems interesting but I feel like we should try to avoid (whenever possible) to base our community processes and workflows on resources that are not part of the ASF. My 2 cents, Jacopo On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:45 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Tue Mar 3