I use the commits update my 9.04.
I also use the ml to check on what has been done when something goes south.
I will try to look at the commits.
I have about 15 projects I am trying to complete so I am rather busy.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Sun Apr 4 19:08:46 2010
New Revision: 930737
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930737view=rev
Log:
Make use of UtilObject.equalsHelper in storeAll.
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericDelegator.java
Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Sun Apr 4 19:08:46 2010
New Revision: 930737
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930737view=rev
Log:
Make use of UtilObject.equalsHelper in storeAll.
Modified:
On 5/04/2010, at 5:11 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Sun Apr 4 19:08:46 2010
New Revision: 930737
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930737view=rev
Log:
Make use of UtilObject.equalsHelper in storeAll.
Modified:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 5:11 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Sun Apr 4 19:08:46 2010
New Revision: 930737
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930737view=rev
Log:
Make use of UtilObject.equalsHelper in storeAll.
Modified:
On 5/04/2010, at 5:47 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 5:11 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Sun Apr 4 19:08:46 2010
New Revision: 930737
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930737view=rev
Log:
Make use of
Is it reasonable for a non-commiter to review commits? To be honest, I never
even considered that I should be doing that.
However, two other things occurred to me ...
Got the distinct feeling that this points to a not very good practice when
it comes to unit testers. I definitely understand
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:43 PM, Bob Morley wrote:
I am definitely not a fisheye expert, but I would hope with its JIRA
integration that something could be automated that would drive reviews
On 5/04/2010, at 9:43 PM, Bob Morley wrote:
Is it reasonable for a non-commiter to review commits? To be honest, I never
even considered that I should be doing that.
Reasonable? It would be fantastic, we have 166 subscribers and very little
feedback.
However, two other things occurred
--- On Mon, 4/5/10, Bob Morley rmor...@emforium.com wrote:
Is it reasonable for a non-commiter to review
commits? To be honest, I never
even considered that I should be doing that.
As an OFBiz user, it seems to me you would have a vested interest in reviewing
commits.
-Adrian
Scott Gray-2 wrote:
Buildbot has been reporting failures since yesterday:
http://ci.apache.org/waterfall?show=ofbiz-trunk
The problem wasn't missed, I just think Adam was a little peeved that no
one noticed his simple mistake in such as small commit.
This isn't a dig at you, but talk is
On 5/04/2010, at 10:34 PM, Bob Morley wrote:
Scott Gray-2 wrote:
Buildbot has been reporting failures since yesterday:
http://ci.apache.org/waterfall?show=ofbiz-trunk
The problem wasn't missed, I just think Adam was a little peeved that no
one noticed his simple mistake in such as small
On 5/04/2010, at 10:54 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Thanks for that url; very interesting indeed. From what I could tell the
set of unit tests that execute are littered with failures (or they
intentionally cause a lot stack traces due to exception).
I've been trying to reduce
--- On Mon, 4/5/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 10:54 PM, Adam Heath
wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Thanks for that url; very interesting
indeed. From what I could tell the
set of unit tests that execute are littered with
failures (or they
intentionally
Bob Morley wrote:
Adrian Crum-2 wrote:
As an OFBiz user, it seems to me you would have a vested interest in
reviewing commits.
Agreed. Our fundamental problem (and this is definitely our problem) is
that we branched off pretty badly and as a result, have not merged Ofbiz
trunk in a
Adrian Crum wrote:
OfBiz is famous of catching an error, logging it, then
rethrowing it.
Repeat ad-infinitum.
OfBiz is famous of catching an error, logging it, then
rethrowing it.
Repeat ad-infinitum.
OfBiz is famous of catching an error, logging it, then rethrowing it.
Repeat
Scott Gray-2 wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 10:54 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Thanks for that url; very interesting indeed. From what I could tell
the
set of unit tests that execute are littered with failures (or they
intentionally cause a lot stack traces due to exception).
Bob Morley wrote:
Scott Gray-2 wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 10:54 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Thanks for that url; very interesting indeed. From what I could tell
the
set of unit tests that execute are littered with failures (or they
intentionally cause a lot stack traces due to
--- On Mon, 4/5/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Scott Gray-2 wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 10:54 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Thanks for that url; very interesting
indeed. From what I could tell
the
set of unit tests that execute are
littered
On 5/04/2010, at 11:38 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Mon, 4/5/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Scott Gray-2 wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 10:54 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Thanks for that url; very interesting
indeed. From what I could tell
the
set
On Apr 6, 2010, at 12:51 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 5/04/2010, at 11:38 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Mon, 4/5/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
I just fixed the first.
The others should have their logging fixed, don't change
the log level
for run-tests.
If low-level code
21 matches
Mail list logo
