Re: OODT 2.0 planning

dependencies and removing old ones, and pointing at new stuff. 2.2 – OpsUi React with Breno’s stuff. 2.3 – We integrate, test and demo the Docker builds. We also test and fully bake the ZK deployments and scaled up Docker. 2.4+ … who knows From: Tom Barber Reply-To: Date: Saturday, October 5

[VOTE RESULT] OODT 1.9 RC 4

oro:oodt mattmann$ java -version > > openjdk version "1.8.0_212" > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 1.8.0_212-b03) > > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.212-b03, mixed mode) > > pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ mvn -V > > Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d6

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OODT 1.9 released

For more information on Apache OODT, visit the project home page: http://oodt.apache.org/ -- Tom Barber, on behalf of the Apache OODT community -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4

oding: UTF-8 OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.14.6", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac" [INFO] Scanning for projects... From: Tom Barber Reply-To: Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 9:18 AM To: , Chris Mattmann Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4

RC 4 Hi Chris, I think from jdk 10 or 11, xml related libraries (jaxb) have been removed from default libraries. That's why you should be getting that error. By the look, it seems like an XML related issue. Thanks, Imesha On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, 3:21 am Tom Barber, wrote: brew tap caskr

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4

t 1, 2019, at 2:28 PM, Tom Barber wrote: > > 8, 9 I think will be okay 10+ will be questionable due the change in API > and jars that need upgrading for compatibility. > > > On 1 October 2019 at 21:58:35, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org) wrote: > > OK so I need J

Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4

8, 9 I think will be okay 10+ will be questionable due the change in API and jars that need upgrading for compatibility. On 1 October 2019 at 21:58:35, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org) wrote: OK so I need JDK8 to build, is that right? From: Tom Barber Reply-To: Date: Tuesday

Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4

using the right one? pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ java -version openjdk version "12.0.1" 2019-04-16 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 12.0.1+12) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 12.0.1+12, mixed mode, sharing) pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ Should I switch? From: Tom Barber Reply

Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4

key "David Woollard (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > wooll...@apache.org>" imported > > gpg: key A5DBC0182C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING > KEY) " imported > > gpg: key 7189700880EF652D: public key "Andrew Hart (CODE SIGNING KEY) <

[VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4

Hi Folks, I have posted a 4th release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC3

Thanks for checking Lewis, I'll have another look after dinner. Tom On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, 17:11 Lewis John McGibbney, wrote: > Hi Tom > Good work spinning a the RC's. My responses are inline > > On 2019/09/26 21:31:57, Tom Barber wrote: > > > > https://dist.apache

Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC3

:09, Tom Barber wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have posted a 3rd release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release. The > source code is at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ > > For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for > details on &g

[VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC3

Hi Folks, I have posted a 3rd release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

[VOTE CANCELLED] OODT 1.9 RC2

Scratch that I built it off the wrong branch... . Take 3 coming up! On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, 14:07 Tom Barber, wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release. The > source code is at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/

[VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC2

Hi Folks, I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

[VOTE CANCELLED] OODT 1.9 RC1

Yeah my fault, I’ll update the KEYs and ship RC2. Thanks for checking. On 26 September 2019 at 10:30:56, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: Its probably me, although I’ve not changed the key to my knowledge. I will check later today. Tom On 26 September 2019 at 10:29:44, Gimhana

Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC1

y the signature. I assume that is an issue on my > side. Can someone else verify that? > > Thanks, > Imesha > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 04:33, Tom Barber wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release. >

[VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC1

Hi Folks, I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

Re: OODT 1.9 / 2.0

stuff. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > > > From: Tom Barber > Reply-To: > Date: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at 12:46 PM > To: > Subject: OODT 1.9 / 2.0 > > > > Hey folks, > > > > I’ve finally cleared m

OODT 1.9 / 2.0

Hey folks, I’ve finally cleared my decks of a bunch of stuff taking up too much of my time, with that done, I’d like to volunteer to be the RM for 1.9 and following that a 2.0 release. If no one objects I’ll start working to a 1.9 release next week so we can ship DRAT as well and get them both

Re: [GSOC] OODT docker build meeting summary

May 2019 at 15:12:43, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: Just a quick recap from our call with Yasith earlier today: Had a good chat with Yasith about how RADIX works and how people build out OODT applications from RADIX ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/RADiX+Powered+By+OODT

Re: [GSOC] OODT React Compoments Call

Gimhana as I just asked Yasith, can you please update the OODT Jira with issue tickets for the stuff you’re going to build so we can track them in releases and ensure that we have enough knowledge passed onto you to complete your tasks. Thanks Tom On 14 May 2019 at 16:15:22, Tom Barber (t

[GSOC] OODT React Compoments Call

Update from our call this afternoon: Gimhana is going to start work by removing one or the other of the FM Components as they are largely duplicate. Initially work will also be done on: Ensuring the JAXRS endpoints will support the development Refining the look and feel Creating a common

[GSOC] OODT docker build meeting summary

Just a quick recap from our call with Yasith earlier today: Had a good chat with Yasith about how RADIX works and how people build out OODT applications from RADIX ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/RADiX+Powered+By+OODT) General Docker build plan is as follows: * Users can

Re: Latest Release version of OODT

Yeah good catch On Sat, May 11, 2019, 09:56 Gimhana Nadeeshan < gimhanadesilva...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > Hi all, > > Shouldn't the OODT download page[1] be synced with OODT git release [2]? > According to the git release page, the current release is 1.2.5 while in > download page 1.2.3. > > [1]

Re: Slack for GSoC mentees

Hey folks, I’ve sent over an invite to the Slack we use to discuss this stuff. As you’re new to Apache, please be aware that if a discussion takes place on Slack, a summary needs to appear on the mailing list if it involved any decisions cause if it didn’t happen on a mailing list, it didn’t

GSOC Projects

Just a quick note to say congrats and welcome to Nadeeshan and Yasith as both of their GSOC proposals got approved. For those not paying attention assuming that we are successful then we’ll have a bunch of new work done on a new React based OPSUI and a new Docker (K8S) deployment technique to

React OODT components next steps

Good work on the react PR’s guys, once Breno has his committed we’ve got a couple of similar components and then a demo app that also does some stuff. I’m contemplating next steps. Combining the 2 file viewer components so that we have a single component to work from seems like a prudent place

Re: OODT NodeJS File Viewer

solution to allow generic component configuration. Tom On 22 April 2019 at 19:57:55, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: Sorry, my meaning of combination was as in “being able to click from the list view to a file object view” not as in “combining the codebase into one element" On 22

Re: OODT NodeJS File Viewer

solution to allow generic component configuration. Tom On 22 April 2019 at 19:57:55, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: Sorry, my meaning of combination was as in “being able to click from the list view to a file object view” not as in “combining the codebase into one element" On 22

Re: Kubernetes operators

n > that case right? > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 16:00, Tom Barber wrote: > > > Just a quick link to somewhere else that I like the pattern of: > > > > https://docs.arangodb.com/devel/Manual/Tutorials/Kubernetes/ > > > > These folks have knocked up a few custo

Re: OODT NodeJS File Viewer

Sorry, my meaning of combination was as in “being able to click from the list view to a file object view” not as in “combining the codebase into one element" On 22 April 2019 at 19:19:12, Gimhana Nadeeshan ( gimhanadesilva...@cse.mrt.ac.lk) wrote: So the combination of two components is not

OODT NodeJS File Viewer

> > > > > >> > > > > > I've found some minor spelling mistakes and some argument >> > references >> > > > > which >> > > > > > can be replaced. Shall I correct those and send a PR to the >> > > developm

Kubernetes operators

Just a quick link to somewhere else that I like the pattern of: https://docs.arangodb.com/devel/Manual/Tutorials/Kubernetes/ These folks have knocked up a few custom Kubernetes operators for ArangoDB that once you have deployed means to launch a new database all you have to do is: apiVersion:

[jira] [Commented] (OODT-986) A React based new UI for OPSUI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808463#comment-16808463 ] Tom Barber commented on OODT-986: - Hey [~dulajdanu] if you're interested in getting some more experience

Re: [EXTERNAL] What is where?

as an option 2.0 first release includes no XML-RPC Let’s set a deadline of 2 weeks to get 1-3 done. That’s it ☺ Deal? From: Tom Barber Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 at 12:25 PM To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Subject: [EXTERNAL] What is where?

What is where?

Hello folks, I have to admit with the OODT code I’m a bit lost and I figure we could do with a clean up prior to GSOC if we get that approved. What branches are stuff on? Can we merge everything into a stable & dev branch and close down a load of the old ones? Where are we with making Avro the

Re: Hello World!

nd any suggestions are warmly welcome! Best Regards, Yasith Jayawardana On 3/16/19 12:51 PM, Tom Barber wrote: No problem, edit away! :) On 16 March 2019 at 16:50:55, Jayawardana, Yasith (yas...@cs.odu.edu) wrote: Oops i just checked and my username is yasith not yasithmilinda. The other is fo

Re: Hello World!

I’ve given Karma to that user, let me know if you can edit stuff now. On 16 March 2019 at 16:38:36, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: yasithmilinda -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125

Re: Hello World!

On the cwiki.apache.org? I’ve just search your username and it says no users found. On 16 March 2019 at 16:31:38, Jayawardana, Yasith (yas...@cs.odu.edu) wrote: yasithmilinda -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. Registered office: First Floor,

Re: Hello World!

Oh I find you under Yasith, I think On 16 March 2019 at 16:38:06, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: yasithmilinda -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston Road, Brighton, England,

Re: Hello World!

he wiki pages. can >>> you please advise the steps I should take to make an edit to the wikis? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Yasith >>> >>> >>>> On 3/13/19 10:51 PM, Jayawardana, Yasith wrote: >>>> Hi Tom, >>>> &

Re: Hello World!

Also, if you want to see how it works “in the real world” Apache DRAT is an OODT implementation for SW License checking. It might be worth spinning that up so you can see how an OODT deployment works. Tom On 13 March 2019 at 20:28:09, Jayawardana, Yasith (yas...@cs.odu.edu) wrote: Hi Imesha,

[jira] [Created] (OODT-1008) Migrate Workflow Manager to Knative

Tom Barber created OODT-1008: Summary: Migrate Workflow Manager to Knative Key: OODT-1008 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1008 Project: OODT Issue Type: Improvement

GSoC 2019 mentor request for Tom Barber

OODT PMC, please acknowledge my request to become a mentor for Google Summer of Code 2018 projects for Apache OODT. I would like to receive the mentor invite to t...@spicule.co.uk Lets make OODT amazing! -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122.

Re: Introducing My Self to Community

kerfile. > > From community point of view, we need the OPSUI revamped as the first > thing. Therefore, your interest in that will be a great help for us. > > @Tom Barber How can we allow confluence wiki editing > permissions to Gimhana? > > Thanks, > Imesha > >

[jira] [Created] (OODT-1007) Automatically deploy docker builds to ASF docker repo

Tom Barber created OODT-1007: Summary: Automatically deploy docker builds to ASF docker repo Key: OODT-1007 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1007 Project: OODT Issue Type

[jira] [Resolved] (OODT-1006) Add dockerfile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Barber resolved OODT-1006. -- Resolution: Fixed > Add dockerfile > -- > > Ke

[jira] [Created] (OODT-1006) Add dockerfile

Tom Barber created OODT-1006: Summary: Add dockerfile Key: OODT-1006 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1006 Project: OODT Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Tom Barber

Re: Introducing My Self to Community

e issue, it will be great. The dockerfile can >> be found at https://github.com/buggtb/oodt-docker/blob/master/Dockerfile. >> >> From community point of view, we need the OPSUI revamped as the first >> thing. Therefore, your interest in that will be a great help for us. >> >

Re: Introducing My Self to Community

Hey Gimhana Good to have you on board, I’m sure as Imesha has been through the GSOC process he can help you with anything related to that end. Other than that feel free to pick up one of the GSOC topics and we can dive into what needs to be done and what the desired outcomes are. Cheers Tom On

[jira] [Commented] (OODT-1004) Make OODT deployment simple using docker and distributed configuration management

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16780634#comment-16780634 ] Tom Barber commented on OODT-1004: -- I think this is a good start and would make scalable data management

Re: Kubernetes OODT deployment

Sorry should include a link as well shouldn’t I: https://cloud.google.com/knative/ On 25 January 2019 at 00:21:16, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: So another idea I have for OODT deployments is to delve into Knative from Google/Pivotal which allows users to build apps to run

Kubernetes OODT deployment

So another idea I have for OODT deployments is to delve into Knative from Google/Pivotal which allows users to build apps to run in a serverless style fashion on Kubernetes. Clearly K8S is creating a massive wave in service deployment at the moment but data apps lag behind somewhat still, for now

Re: [Discuss] OODT Containerization Plan

with necessary flags for service configuration. Admitedly I ve not tried out the distributed configuration management yet. Is there any documentation I can swot up on it please? [0] https://github.com/capstone-coal/coal-sds/ [1] https://brooklyn.apache.org On 2018/11/24 22:22:06, Tom Barber wrote: >

Re: [Discuss] OODT Containerization Plan

Hey Imesha, et al, I think the ideas are pretty good. Radix is a good starting point, but there needs to be a useful recipe for people wanting to customise it with their own stuff. Docker Compose is a good way for spinning up a multi container solution, although without Swarm, you don’t get any

[jira] [Created] (OODT-1001) OpsUI React Components

Tom Barber created OODT-1001: Summary: OpsUI React Components Key: OODT-1001 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1001 Project: OODT Issue Type: Improvement Components

Re: React based OPSUI

... The above is not very helpful I admit. It is however my opinion at this point in time. Lewis On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:09 PM wrote: > > From: Tom Barber > To: dev@oodt.apache.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:46:33 -0700 > Subject: React based OPSUI > H

React based OPSUI

Hi folks, I’m mocking and stubbing out ideas for a React based OPSUI. Its not designed to reinvent the wheel, but modernise, allow easier theming/branding, be modular for people wanting to embed specific components into apps and so on. I have plans in my head for a couple of extra screens for

Re: [jira] [Created] (OODT-997) JAXRS endpoints broken

FMPROD* Cheers, Chris From: "Tom Barber (JIRA)" Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Date: Monday, October 15, 2018 at 3:12 PM To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Subject: [jira] [Created] (OODT-997) JAXRS endpoints broken Tom Barber created OODT-997: ---

[jira] [Created] (OODT-997) JAXRS endpoints broken

Tom Barber created OODT-997: --- Summary: JAXRS endpoints broken Key: OODT-997 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-997 Project: OODT Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Tom Barber

Re: OODT docker builds

> > > In reality it would be much more flexible and much more inline with how > > docker containers should be deployed, which is as a single process > > container not as a bunch of processes all stuck into 1 unit. > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: OODT docker builds

Also don’t forget, Docker containers, don’t ship Kernel’s etc and all the system stuff, which is what keeps them lightweight. On 15 October 2018 at 17:43:37, Tom Barber (t...@spicule.co.uk) wrote: Not at all and if you want to run OODT on Kubernetes for example, that would be how you’d do

Re: OODT docker builds

container not as a bunch of processes all stuck into 1 unit. On 15 October 2018 at 17:32:32, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org) wrote: Isn’t an image per component really heavyweight? *From: *Tom Barber *Date: *Monday, October 15, 2018 at 8:26 AM *To: *Imesha Sudasingha *Cc: *dev

Re: OODT docker builds

;-) As an starting point, we can add an all-in-one docker image to be built in the RADIX build, right? If you start off, I will be able to join you along the way. Thanks, Imesha On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 16:33, Tom Barber wrote: > I was thinking about the outputs. Currently everything is 1 doc

Re: OODT docker builds

? Thanks, Imesha On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 15:40, Tom Barber wrote: > I’m interested in the Dockerization of OODT but also conscious that most > people use RADIX to build their stuff, which make’s overriding bits of a > prebuilt image tricky. > > I’m wondering if its worth adding an

OODT docker builds

I’m interested in the Dockerization of OODT but also conscious that most people use RADIX to build their stuff, which make’s overriding bits of a prebuilt image tricky. I’m wondering if its worth adding an optional Docker profile to RADIX to add a Docker build step to the backend of people’s

Re: Updated docker image

to http://localhost:8080/opsui/ and you will see the operations user interface. Good work, this is very convenient. Lewis On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:14 PM wrote: dev Digest 9 Oct 2018 22:14:17 - Issue 1327 Topics (messages 8498 through 8498) Updated docker image 8498 by: Tom Barber

Updated docker image

Evening, After prodding by Lewis, I’ve pushed an updated Radix docker image to https://hub.docker.com/r/buggtb/oodt/ This is built off of the 1.2.3 release. Happy to extend or enhance it if anyone has any good ideas, and I’ll figure out a 1.9 version shortly. Happy OODT-ing. Tom -- Spicule

Re: Keeping Track of Future Improvements/Releases

Sorry for the delay on replying to this one. Good work Imesha thanks for cleaning this up. I’m looking forward to the new found effort getting put into OODT, and I’m working, after a prod from Lewis, on a new docker build/image and probably also do one thats Avro by default for easy testing

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OODT 1.2.5 released

/oodt.asc For more information on Apache OODT, visit the project home page: http://oodt.apache.org/ -- Tom Barber, on behalf of the Apache OODT community -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Pre

[RESULT] OODT 1.2.5 RC1

erve that NOTICE.txt and NOTICE are out of sync... we should synchronize the content and remove one of them. - What purpose does DEPENDENCIES serve now? It is essentially an empty useless file. The RC builds and tests resulting in a BUILD SUCCESS +1 from me. Thanks Lewis On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 7:00 AM

[VOTE] OODT 1.2.5 RC1

Hi Folks, I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.5 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

Upcoming releases

Just curious to get some feedback on the upcoming release organisation. If I understand correctly we’re shipped 1.2.5 with the logging fix for DRAT release. Then in reasonably short order, we’re going to ship 1.9 RC1 or 2.0RC1 for Avro? We should also ship 1.2.6 and 1.9RC2 or 2.0RC2 to

Re: Looking for apache packages

Erk! Hi Cecilia, The Apache Pear server went away a while ago now, and I think the artefacts went with it. I don’t know if they were ever mirrored anywhere, Sean Kelly might have a clue. Tom On 31 August 2018 at 03:29:48, Cheng, Cecilia S (398A) ( cecilia.s.ch...@jpl.nasa.gov) wrote: Hi All,

[jira] [Commented] (OODT-991) Logs too verbose

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16584290#comment-16584290 ] Tom Barber commented on OODT-991: - I don't think so Imesha, We ran 0.10 and saw the same stuff

[jira] [Created] (OODT-991) Logs too verbose

Tom Barber created OODT-991: --- Summary: Logs too verbose Key: OODT-991 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-991 Project: OODT Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Tom Barber

[RESULT] OODT 1.2.4 Release Candidate 1

with DRAT. Since Chris (and the DRAT GSoC student) has tested with it, I assume there won't be any issue. +1 from me. Cheers, Imesha On 15 August 2018 at 22:12, Chris Mattmann wrote: > yay > > > > pretty please pretty please > > > > From: Tom Barber > Reply-To:

Re: OODT 1.2.4 Release Candidate 1

Chris is like my kids when they get a new toy ;) Can we have another +1 from someone so we can ship this and get it incorporated into DRAT? On 14 August 2018 at 22:02:40, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org) wrote: +1 from me.

Re: OODT 1.2.4 Release Candidate 1

rmation about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException [ERROR] [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command [ERROR] mvn -rf :cas-resource nonas:oodt

OODT 1.2.4 Release Candidate 1

Hi Folks, To restore JDK 1.8 support I have shipped a 1.2.4 RC. I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.4 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release

[RESULT] Apache OODT 1.2.3 Release

l/67 > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > From: Tom Barber > Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" > Date: Monday, August 6, 2018 at 4:26 PM > To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.3 Release >

[VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.3 Release

Hi Folks, I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.3 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

[jira] [Updated] (OODT-989) Lucene crashes when under load

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Barber updated OODT-989: Fix Version/s: 1.2.3 > Lucene crashes when under l

[jira] [Resolved] (OODT-989) Lucene crashes when under load

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Barber resolved OODT-989. - Resolution: Fixed > Lucene crashes when under l

[jira] [Created] (OODT-989) Lucene crashes when under load

Tom Barber created OODT-989: --- Summary: Lucene crashes when under load Key: OODT-989 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-989 Project: OODT Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Tom

Re: 1.2.3 Release

on this ;) Cheers, Chris From: Tom Barber Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Date: Friday, July 20, 2018 at 4:39 AM To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Subject: 1.2.3 Release Hi folks, In fixing some stuff in DRAT I’ve also had to fix some stuff in the Lucene Catalog which fails und

1.2.3 Release

Hi folks, In fixing some stuff in DRAT I’ve also had to fix some stuff in the Lucene Catalog which fails under pressure. There’s a PR open and when Chris tests and validates it we’ll need to ship OODT 1.2.3. I messed up so I’ll do the release. Tom -- Spicule Limited is registered in England

[jira] [Assigned] (OODT-988) OODT doesn't run on JDK10

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Barber reassigned OODT-988: --- Assignee: Ryan McDonagh (was: Tom Barber) > OODT doesn't run on JD

[jira] [Commented] (OODT-988) OODT doesn't run on JDK10

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16543262#comment-16543262 ] Tom Barber commented on OODT-988: - Okay PR coming in to address this shortly. There will be other Jira

[jira] [Commented] (OODT-988) OODT doesn't run on JDK10

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16542986#comment-16542986 ] Tom Barber commented on OODT-988: - Yeah me and [~RyanMcDonagh] are looking into it > OODT doesn't

[jira] [Assigned] (OODT-988) OODT doesn't run on JDK10

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Barber reassigned OODT-988: --- Assignee: Tom Barber > OODT doesn't run on JDK10 > - > >

[jira] [Created] (OODT-988) OODT doesn't run on JDK10

Tom Barber created OODT-988: --- Summary: OODT doesn't run on JDK10 Key: OODT-988 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-988 Project: OODT Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Tom Barber

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache OODT to use Apache's Gitbox (Full Github integration)

+1 make it so! On Fri, 18 May 2018, 18:15 Chris Mattmann, wrote: > See DISCUSS thread here: https://s.apache.org/mYgX > > > > Please VOTE to make Apache OODT use the Gitbox integration for full R/W > multi-master > Github and ASF integration. This will allow merging of pull

Re: Congratulations on your new role at Apache

Woop! Congrats to our new Chair, Imesha. On 18/04/18 20:21, Craig L Russell wrote: Dear new PMC chairs, Congratulations on your new role at Apache. I've changed your LDAP privileges to reflect your new status. Please read this and update the foundation records:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OODT 1.2.2 Released

/oodt.asc For more information on Apache OODT, visit the project home page: http://oodt.apache.org/ -- Tom Barber, on behalf of the Apache OODT community -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125

[RESULT] Apache OODT 1.2.2 release

Thanks chaps With 3 +1's I think we have a winner. Tom Barber Lewis McGibbney Sean Kelly I'll sort out the packages over the next couple of days ready for release. Regards, Tom On 08/02/18 06:00, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: Hi Tom, Same checks as Nutjob. +1 from me. Some trivial comments

VOTE Apache OODT 1.2.2 release

Hi Folks, I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.2 release. The source code is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was made using

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

, at 7:14 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: Okay, I'm digging this one back up. I'm changing my vote to -1 because of OODT-968 which causes data loss. I fixed it a few weeks ago, so what I propose is that we can this vote, and I'll roll a 1.2.1 RC2 tomorrow or Saturday and

Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.2.1 release candidate #1

Okay, I'm digging this one back up. I'm changing my vote to -1 because of OODT-968 which causes data loss. I fixed it a few weeks ago, so what I propose is that we can this vote, and I'll roll a 1.2.1 RC2 tomorrow or Saturday and reopen the vote with that included. Tom On 21/12/17 18:12,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >