by spending it by David Blevins (Apache OpenEJB)
Reminder that we use JIRA to generate the release notes, so don't forget to add
JIRAs for anything users will want to know about.
We didn't really generate release notes for the beta-1, but we definitely will
for beta-2.
-David
On Nov 13, 2011, at 4:06 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov 8, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
there are already several classes we could want to extract
what i don't like with this ejb is it will be exposed to user since it is
loggued and not usable by him
Maybe we need to write in some sort of hidden flag and corresponding
On Nov 6, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
My understanding - and this might be wrong - is that the existing
DeployerEjb behaves differently to just dropping the .war file in the
webapps directory. When we deploy using DeployerEjb, OpenEJB processes the
.war file first, and then
.
-David
2011/11/7 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Nov 6, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
My understanding - and this might be wrong - is that the existing
DeployerEjb behaves differently to just dropping the .war file in the
webapps directory. When we deploy using
adapters should be using this
method
as well?
Jon
On Nov 7, 2011 7:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
ok but the webappdeployer is not linked to the deployment at all, just
to
the way we deploy tcks so should we keep this ejb on trunk?
- Romain
2011/11/7 David
Having that ability would be great, though maybe that page is too big even with
a big index.
Maybe we should brake up that page into separate pages?
-David
On Nov 5, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Vishwanath Krishnamurthi wrote:
Hi,
Some of our documentation pages are huge. I think it would be cool
It came up on twitter, so moving the conversation here.
When do we want to get a final release out? I had thought by the beginning of
the year (guessing). Karan and Romain both pinged me and both said sooner.
That's excellent if we can pull it off.
Here's what I think we'd need to see before
presentations
This one could be more current
ApacheCon and TomEE
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:15 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can anyone think of more recent news to post?
-David
--
Karan Singh Malhi
twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi
(or is that just for staging?).
Jon
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:15 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Can anyone think of more recent news to post?
-David
This one I promised Infra for all their hard work on the CMS and the help in
rolling it out.
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/openejb/?previewEntry=apache_cms_for_the_win
We can publish this in-between some of the other posts perhaps.
-David
On Nov 4, 2011, at 9:23 PM, David Blevins wrote
Can anyone think of more recent news to post?
-David
?).
Jon
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:15 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Can anyone think of more recent news to post?
-David
On Oct 26, 2011, at 11:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Took a shot at using bootstrap in the CMS.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/index.html
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/documentation.html
Do we like it enough to give it try on the main site?
Of course we can tweak as much as we want
For our current and future presenters and example writers!
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/dev/writing-examples.html
-David
On Oct 29, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Vishwanath Krishnamurthi wrote:
Hi,
Also this patch
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/OPENEJB-1638-Examples-Documentation-td3868495.html
has some documentation :)
Thank you so much for the reminder.. and the docs!
Got them all checked in and up on the
On Oct 30, 2011, at 5:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
i updated generated example template...is it still relevant to keep this
site?
We'll definitely need the parts that create the zip files. And for the longest
time we've been wanting to create IDE project files, so maybe we can start
On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:26 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
the global
individual names it uses are slightly different to ours:
Java:global/test.ear/test vs Java:global/test/test.jar.
Interesting. Both look wrong to me. My recollection is that app and module
names should not contain the
Should we just add it to the build?
We have a number of unit tests in it that really should be part of the build.
We should have many more too.
-David
On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
i prefer to move it at the same level than container and assembly when
arquillian will build
Works for me.
-David
, 2011 at 2:46 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Quick question on the org.apache.myfaces.core:myfaces-api jar.
Is it tied to MyFaces in some way? Guessing the answer is, yes, as it is
labeled myfaces-api and not something more generic like faces-api
If the answer
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:52 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hiram Chirino pointed this out to me this week. Looks like some great
building blocks for a site:
http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/
I felt in love
Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Hi folks!
Where can I find the sources.zip?
This usually gets created via a task defined in apache-parent.pom
It should be somewhere in the staging repo, but I couldn't find it.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev
Just ran my little report. Haven't checked out the results yet too much:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-090/archives.html
-David
On Oct 22, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo
On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here is the html rendering in staging.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/index.html
Sorry to say so, but I don't like the new layout. It's a bit too soft
We have a board report due this Monday. Have it started with a little outline:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENEJB/October2011
Call to action for all to throw in some notes. I'll be doing the same. Add
anything you feel is important.
Edit away!
-David
And feel free to just add short notes. Thoughts don't have to be complete
On Oct 14, 2011, at 7:14 PM, David Blevins wrote:
We have a board report due this Monday. Have it started with a little
outline:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENEJB/October2011
Call to action
Backup strategy would be to vote and publish these zips ourselves.
Begin forwarded message:
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Date: October 13, 2011 5:01:50 PM PDT
To: Tomcat Developers List d...@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Publishing zips to the maven repo
We've been using plain
So one of the things I think would be really excellent for the 1.0.0-beta-2 is
to get our Arquillian support polished and released.
I showed our Arquillian support at the JavaOne TomEE talk to demonstrate that
a) it works embeddable and b) yes it runs in 2-3 seconds. I wasn't able to
show too
Digging into some TCP Multipoint/failover issues at the moment. Will check
this out immediately after unless someone beats me to it.
-David
On Oct 9, 2011, at 10:05 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
*Test method* *Time (seconds)* *Exception*
testBeanTypesAndBindingTypesOfPersistenceContext 0
On Mar 25, 2011, at 7:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Since we're no longer really referring to the integration as OpenEJB-Tomcat,
I'm going to try to do some renaming in the assembly/ directory. Basically
disfavoring openejb-tomcat and favoring tomee instead.
Heads up! :)
Never got
Still setting it up, but here it is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE
-David
On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I wanted to talk about it earlier with the svn refactoting, do we create a
tomee project?
- Romain
Le 8 oct. 2011 21:32, David Blevins
On Oct 6, 2011, at 2:50 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that everyone here cares so much they wish they could do more. It
may surprise you to learn I feel like that pretty much all the time too. It
just
On Oct 5, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Our home page includes another page dedicated to TomEE. Reorganised
the TomEE page, but changes not showing up.
Just need to select our spaces and click rebuild spaces
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/admin/autoexport/configuration.action
Seems news has started to get out. Not clear if this is going to create an
issue, but I think it's best to get these binaries on the mirrors asap.
Closing the vote with 9 +1s and no other votes:
+1 votes:
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Jacek Laskowski
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Updated the tomee-embedded module which has an embeddable version of TomEE.
With a couple tweaks we're now using the same embedded code that Tomcat uses in
its internal tests and things are pretty fast.
Running in my IDE I've seen speeds as low as 1.8s, but normally around 2.5 or
2.8s,
in the left and right navigation panes.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/
Cheers
Daniel
PS: I noticed that the mockup did contain some blur because of the
JPEG format used to save the image.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote
...
Everything else looked good. Once the above/preceding problems are fixed,
I'll be +1.
Great job pulling this together, David!
--kevan
On Oct 1, 2011, at 2:17 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
Found you and added you as an admin
User: danielshaischt
(yay gmail and iPhones)
On Sunday, October 2, 2011, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
The confluence ID will be 'dsh' AFAIK... at least that's my p.a.o login
ID.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:56 PM, David Blevins
Ok, new binaries ready to go and spent some time truly examining the difference
between the builds to verify only the desired LICENSE changes were made and no
code change.
Now vote coming right up.
-David
On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:16 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Thanks, Kevan! If you (or anyone
NOTE TO EVERYONE
I know re-rolling can be very time consuming and often
people vote on the first release attempt and never vote
again. We want a strong turnout for this vote and it
would be a shame to end it with 3, 4 or 5 votes.
In an effort to save everyone a considerable amount
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
- fixed SNAPSHOT references in src
- Added missing CDDL license to the source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-019/
Src:
Jean-Louis forwarded me this image. The only text was in French, which I don't
speak, but it's pretty safe bet to know what it is ;)
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/images/newsite-tan.jpg
Looks nice! Way better than what we have and would be a great template to use
for the launch.
If we
for the announcement even if it's only
temporary.
-David
Le 1 oct. 2011 20:51, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com a écrit :
I love it!. +1 on this template. Will share my ideas in another email
regarding TomEE launch.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jean
. 2011 22:27, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Oct 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I would like something more dynamic, maybe more orange like our bean.
We can certainly do that. I expect we'll keep playing with the site and
possible TomEE logos for the next
-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Didn't get time yesterday to get something better. But, I can collect all
your ideas, requirements, etc and get a new proposal from our designers.
Hopefully on Monday.
Jean Louis
Le 1 oct. 2011 22:27, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
/bikeshed
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:54 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI, to all. Chatting with Sally who does all the Apache announcements and
it looks like either the 5th or 6th will be the date. Anything later than
that and JavaOne is essentially over
On Oct 1, 2011, at 2:10 PM, dsh wrote:
We could have a beta ribbon in one corner for the beta site...
something like [1]... just an idea.
Oh that's neat! I like it.
-David
[1] http://quickribbon.com/
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:02 PM, David Blevins david.blev
of the things we can do towards having a fantastic release:
1. Release soon. JavaOne is next week, and we defintely want to
release TomEE ASAP. David blevins will be talking at JavaOne and its a
great opportunity to atleast let the folks know about TomEE. Timing
wise , this is a superb opportunity
Yanked the '3' from our svn trunk. A little awkward as we're on version 4 now
:)
Just run this in your checkout and all will be fine:
svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/openejb
-David
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
FYI, I asked someone in my company to help us with the design of the new web
site.
If we could get something sexy to accompany the upcoming Apache OpenEJB
4.0.0, that'd be great.
Was describing to Jean-Louis how the site works so he
On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:00 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
FYI, I asked someone in my company to help us with the design of the new web
site.
If we could get something sexy to accompany the upcoming Apache OpenEJB
4.0.0, that'd be great
Ok! I think it's voting time. I've rolled a few binaries and worked out every
little license detail and finally got something I think is probably the best
set of binaries we've rolled.
The tag and repo:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-1/
Forgot my +1!
-David
On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok! I think it's voting time. I've rolled a few binaries and worked out
every little license detail and finally got something I think is probably the
best set of binaries we've rolled.
The tag and repo:
http
, at 4:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok! I think it's voting time. I've rolled a few binaries and worked out
every little license detail and finally got something I think is probably
the best set of binaries we've rolled.
The tag and repo:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags
Was chatting with Romain and he mentioned some fixes he wanted to add that
didn't make this release. I imagine that there'll be plenty of fixes that will
happen over the next couple weeks.
For several small reasons that add up and are totally unmeasurable, we tend to
drift into long release
Seems we have some oddness in the source.
openejb.version4.0.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT/openejb.version
./examples/mbean-auto-registration/pom.xml
openejb.version4.0.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT/openejb.version
./examples/dynamic-datasource-routing/pom.xml
...@gmail.com wrote:
I definitely agree. Sounds great.
Jon
On Sep 30, 2011 8:01 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Was chatting with Romain and he mentioned some fixes he wanted to add
that
didn't make this release. I imagine that there'll be plenty of fixes that
will happen over
Just remember a thought I had before going to bed last night
Calling Apache TomEE a 4.0.0-beta-1 is a big mistake.
Should be Apache TomEE a 1.0.0-beta-1.
I think we're probably working against ourselves by not making it as new and
exciting as possible. Some people might be confused 4.0?
heh, ok. that was mean to be sent to me. some notes for one of my JavaOne
talks!
Nothing secret about it, just completely out of context. :)
Disregard :)
-David
On Sep 30, 2011, at 6:07 PM, David Blevins wrote:
The ability to override annotations without having to express the linkage
Hold off on commits for just a bit, going to try to roll a release.
If it gets complicated, I'll branch.
-David
On Sep 29, 2011, at 2:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Hold off on commits for just a bit, going to try to roll a release.
Of course I change the version number and things fail
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 30 00:34:14 UTC 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 360M/494M
[INFO
OK, got binaries up but not calling a vote as I still see some issues with the
legal files thanks to our new tool. Will fix those and roll again
FYI:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-010
-David
On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:23 PM, David Blevins wrote:
OK, got binaries up but not calling a vote as I still see some issues with
the legal files thanks to our new tool. Will fix those and roll again
FYI:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-010
See
Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more
coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
The tool will download all the archives from the maven staging repo, unpack
them and create a little report of what is there:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:45 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Wed Sep 28 07:45:20 2011
New Revision: 1176770
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176770view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
),
specifically you only need one The Apache Software Foundation
(http://www.apache.org/) entry in there for all of Apache and not one per
project.
Going to be using the tool to clean up trunk as well which I think is also in
bad shape.
-David
2011/9/28 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:25 AM, AndyG wrote:
Just reverted, but shouldn't we really have a DescriptionType[] for this?
I haven't looked closely at the schema for DataSource. Some of the other
description types allow for localized descriptions. If this one does too,
maybe we should use the
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more
coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
You're
On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
When I hacked up the Remote with zip adapter I intended to
merge it into the remote adapter - along the lines of: check to see if TomEE
is running on the port specified in arquillian.xml. If it is, just deploy
straight to it. If not, go
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
I was thinking it would be cool to try and extend either the test suite or
the Arquillian test runner somehow so the test then runs against all the
adapters in one go.
I was going to do the Maven profile bit first, as that should be
Did some memory tweaking to try and cut down on the number of classes loaded.
Couple interesting things
# TempClassLoader
TempClassLoader was full of system classes (and still is somewhat). We hand
one of these to the JPA impl and they use it to do runtime enhancing. I cut
down on the
On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:43 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Did some memory tweaking to try and cut down on the number of classes loaded.
Couple interesting things
# TempClassLoader
TempClassLoader was full of system classes (and still is somewhat). We
hand one of these to the JPA impl
On Sep 26, 2011, at 5:32 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:09 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Mon Sep 26 09:09:56 2011
New Revision: 1175732
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1175732view=rev
Log:
Fix: InputStream was not being
On Sep 26, 2011, at 2:28 AM, Fredrik Jonson wrote:
In b58b5102-2fde-436a-9f60-32b38ccb1...@gmail.com David Blevins wrote:
# JAXB Accessors
One of the biggest polluters of the class space is JAXB as it generates
accessors for all the fields. First thought is, gee, I wonder if we can do
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:44 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Sun Sep 25 08:44:56 2011
New Revision: 1175332
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1175332view=rev
Log:
rat config file
Added:
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:06 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:45 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Sun Sep 25 08:45:28 2011
New Revision: 1175333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1175333view=rev
Log:
added license headers
...
Modified:
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
the 23M distrib is ok for me but not the code modification...
Not sure what modification you might be thinking about. Feel free to
revert/change anything that doesn't look good.
-David
2011/9/25 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:24 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:44 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Sun Sep 25 08:44:56 2011
New Revision: 1175332
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1175332view
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
was thinking of removing webservices scanning in core for example which can
be harder and less clear to do elsewhere
Ahh. Yeah, that would be a pain.
2011/9/25 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:33 AM
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
- LICENSE/NOTICE files (likely out of date)
On this note, thinking maybe we want to move the jetty assemblies out of trunk
for at least this release or we'll have to spend the time to create proper
LICENSE/NOTICE files for those assemblies
splitting of the
web services code in the openejb-tomcat-catalina jar. Trying to keep the
changes as tiny as possible to avoid breaking anything.
Interestingly, eliminating the extras cuts 20MB from the distro.
-David
2011/9/24 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Build's working
If we could get a release up for a vote in this coming week, that'd be
absolutely wonderful.
Some things that need to happen:
- Trim the distro (need to chop out web services, jms, etc from tomee)
- RAT scan -- ensure headers where needed
- LICENSE/NOTICE files (likely out of date)
-
I suppose getting the build working is probably high on the list too :)
Hacking on it.
-David
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
If we could get a release up for a vote in this coming week, that'd be
absolutely wonderful.
Some things that need to happen:
- Trim
, David Blevins wrote:
I suppose getting the build working is probably high on the list too :)
Hacking on it.
-David
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
If we could get a release up for a vote in this coming week, that'd be
absolutely wonderful.
Some things that need
On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:53 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:28 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Wed Sep 21 21:28:17 2011
New Revision: 1173874
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173874view=rev
Log:
patched openwebbeans-jsf without the
Vote passes with 4 +1s and no other votes:
+1s
David Blevins
David Jencks
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Romain Manni-Bucau
For posterity, as there were several rerolls, here are the +1s from the
previous votes:
Alan Cabrera
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Kevan Miller
Thank you to everyone who voted
On Sep 16, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Marius Kruger wrote:
I tried to build that manually too, but then it complains about
javaee-api-embedded.
Where can I checkout javaee-api-embedded these days?
It was actually deleted here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1159598
Likely
On Sep 19, 2011, at 6:19 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Marius Kruger wrote:
I tried to build that manually too, but then it complains about
javaee-api-embedded.
Where can I checkout javaee-api-embedded these days?
It was actually deleted here:
http
On Sep 16, 2011, at 2:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Well we worked and work a lot for TCKs but we probably introduced a bug: if
we use normal tomcat deployement (and not remote one) a lot of work is not
done and some javaee6 functionnalities are missing.
i think the magic should be
to me though, and the binaries I
built from the tag match up ok.
Jon
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
+1 Looks good to me.
sig/checksum, license/notice, rat, build, jars...
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:09 AM, David Blevins wrote
Absolutely wonderful!
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
FYI, I asked someone in my company to help us with the design of the new web
site.
If we could get something sexy to accompany the upcoming Apache OpenEJB
4.0.0, that'd be great.
Any thoughts?
Jean-Louis
Fixes:
- ensured source is not in the binaries
- removed whitespace from osgi package exports
- bundle activator that can handle activating many things
- removed the ccpp which is not part of javaee (and not needed anyway)
The staging repo binaries:
One more closed vote. New vote posted with a list of fixed issues.
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:13 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:42 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Did not see any results.
Is the vote close?
Was hoping to get a vote from David Jencks. I know he's been
My +1
Vote will close in 72 hours sharp.
-David
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Fixes:
- ensured source is not in the binaries
- removed whitespace from osgi package exports
- bundle activator that can handle activating many things
- removed the ccpp which
On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:48 PM, AndyG wrote:
Changed serialVersionUIDs in 'org.apache.openejb.math' that conflict with
identical commons.math classes (from which they are copied). Not serious,
but intellij, netbeans and possibly other IDEs see these classes as the same
and can lead to
On Sep 10, 2011, at 5:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
As mentioned in the other thread. We're at 51 failures out of the full 849.
That's with no excludes applied yet (there are some).
Anyway, we're getting there!
Most the work seems to be in the JSF side of things.
Got some
still need one in the dist dir for the mirrors.
-David
On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:09 AM, David Blevins wrote:
The staging repo binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-043/org/apache/openejb/javaee-api/6.0-1/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb
On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:27 AM, stratwine wrote:
Hi,
I have added some documentation for
examples/async-methods and
examples/simple-mdb
Thanks to github supporting markdown in gist, saving a partially done doc
and going back to it later is pretty easy !
All checked in both patches!
---
Key: OPENEJB-1570
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1570
Project: OpenEJB
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: deployment, ejb3 simplified
Reporter: David Blevins
401 - 500 of 1653 matches
Mail list logo
