On May 31, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
With a little perl skills we could get the CMS to process the markdown
files. Then the website would update itself each time we checked in a new
example. Sort of a hithub-like solution were README.mdtext get turned into
website
copy
https://svn/lucy/cms svn copy https://svn/openejb/cms' then merge in
all your changes. We could just import them straight, but it might be nice to
have the svn history.
-David
2011/5/31 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On May 31, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
I like it.
On May 31, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
1) Home
2) Documentation
3) FAQ
Our FAQ is pretty bad. We might want to kill that page or write a new one.
4) Community (facebook, twitter, issues (fom jira) etc...)
We could probably put info on the source code and how to
On May 31, 2011, at 3:53 PM, stratwine wrote:
Wow, feels great. My First time submitting a patch to any open source project
:)
Didn't know it was this simple :)
Simple and fun! Little projects like the one you're working are great ways to
start too.
Well, the next step would be to
On May 30, 2011, at 3:58 PM, stratwine wrote:
Hi,
I have added a patch for OPENEJB-1565.
Please review..
That's awesome, Vishwa! Got it ready to check in. Small request, can you
reattach the patch and make sure to click that Grant license to ASF option.
Once we get that I can check
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1566
Task is up for grabs.
Basics of it are pull in the README.md for each example and use a markdown
processor to generate the HTML -- some options [1][2]. Slap on the Syntax
highlighting css/js[3]. Wrap the HTML with some links to the other
On May 30, 2011, at 4:45 PM, stratwine wrote:
Yep, Done :)
Checked in!
So what is the next step?
-David
On May 30, 2011, at 5:29 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Excellent statement of the problem space. I don't think I ever thought of
things like this.
Any ideas on solutions? Not sure I see what we need to code up.
Referring specifically to the idea of an examples zip that contains 100
Great way to take things a step further :)
If we did everything this way we might have better documentation :)
-David
On May 30, 2011, at 7:13 PM, kma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kmalhi
Date: Tue May 31 02:13:47 2011
New Revision: 1129468
URL:
So I've chatted with Infra and it seems that the kind of thing we want to do
with keeping the example documentation in SVN with the examples and using
Markdown as the format could be done with the CMS provided a little Perl
hacking and some clever use of svn externals.
The CMS was only
On May 30, 2011, at 12:14 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
are we talking about a openejb communication refactoring?
Wasn't originally thinking so broad, but it has turned into that... which is
pretty cool :)
from my side i know there are the website, an apache blog etc...
couldn't it be
--- On Sat, 5/28/11, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Subject: Ideas for Getting the word out
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Date: Saturday, May 28, 2011, 11:50 PM
Some IRC chat resulted in some neat
ideas on ways to dramatically improve
/
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:50 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Some IRC chat resulted in some neat ideas on ways to dramatically improve
how easy it is to consume and learn about OpenEJB.
# Examples
One thing that hit home is that we have now 46 examples in trunk!!!
Amazing
-David
--
-- Aldrin Leal, ald...@leal.eng.br / http://www.leal.eng.br/mnemetica/
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:50 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Some IRC chat resulted in some neat ideas on ways to dramatically improve
how easy it is to consume and learn about OpenEJB
Some IRC chat resulted in some neat ideas on ways to dramatically improve how
easy it is to consume and learn about OpenEJB.
# Examples
One thing that hit home is that we have now 46 examples in trunk!!! Amazing.
However the benefit of that is dramatically reduced as most of them are only
On May 25, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
ops, I'm looking into it.
:) Not bad for such a huge number of patches!
I'm really going to have to get into git.
-David
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
Hi Hao!
On May 25, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Hao Lieu wrote:
hello,
just got on board and looking to eventually contribute to the project,
curious...
what's the expected progression from newbie to active contributor?
what's a typical timeline?
what do newbies typically do on an apache project
Gmail does that. It drives me nuts.
I used a different mail provider prior to this year and it always gave me the
mail when it was truly delivered to the list.
-David
On May 25, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Hao Lieu wrote:
guess this means if you're the sender, you won't be a recipient of the
email.
Another one would be to get a successful build so snapshots are published:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-branch32
-David
On May 26, 2011, at 1:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
OK Romain, looks like a good issue to start committing :-)
Also +1 with Mohammad.
JLouis
2011/5/26
that would take digest emails and break them apart into normal mbox
format.
-David
2011/5/26 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Gmail does that. It drives me nuts.
I used a different mail provider prior to this year and it always gave me
the mail when it was truly delivered
travel. I wont be able to
contribute during the day. If someone could take care of this build, it
would be much appreciated.
I'm still really jealous you got to Roma, Firenze and Cinque Terre!
-David
PS: will fix bugs for fumetti di Paperinik
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:15 PM, David Blevins
to the point where we can add some examples and really get it it locked
in.
I would be more than happy to give as much OpenEJB insight as needed. List,
IRC, and few skype sessions would be fine as well.
-David
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:37 AM, David Blevins-2 [via OpenEJB]
ml-node+3548547
Ok, closing vote :)
12 +1 votes and no other votes:
Andrew Gumbrecht
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Haihong Xu
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Singh Malhi
Kevan Lee Miller
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Thiago Veronezi
Welcome aboard, Shawn!!!
-David
Ok, closing this vote too :)
12 +1 votes and no other votes:
Andrew Gumbrecht
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Haihong Xu
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Singh Malhi
Kevan Lee Miller
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Thiago Veronezi
Welcome aboard, Romain
Shawn, you're all hooked up! Try a commit :)
On May 25, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Welcome Shawn
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:18 PM, David Blevins
david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, closing vote :)
12 +1 votes and no other votes:
Andrew Gumbrecht
Daniel Stefan Haischt
:59 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Welcome Romain
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:37 PM, David Blevins
david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, closing this vote too :)
12 +1 votes and no other votes:
Andrew Gumbrecht
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Haihong Xu
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Those data types used to be strings. That's probably why it worked before.
I wouldn't lose any sleep if we changed them back to String from QName if it
made things easier now. Can always revisit it later.
-David
On May 24, 2011, at 7:39 AM, Ivan wrote:
I just committed some changes to
On May 22, 2011, at 11:40 PM, dsh wrote:
Do we want to have a voting thread for Yegor as well? Didn't spot any yet...
I think we need to be more active in helping him out.
-David
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:55 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Discussion seems to have
Begin forwarded message:
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Date: May 23, 2011 2:49:11 PM PDT
To: us...@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: java.lang.LinkageError
On May 13, 2011, at 3:17 AM, joe wrote:
The attached stacktrace is produced everytime the client invokes
totally agree with
DBlevins.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 17, 2011, at 11:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
We're probably way overdue for assessing our future committer situation.
We have some great people doing excellent work and some
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
Seems we broke the example/schedule-methods part of the build. I setup a spare
machine to cycle back through the trunk revisions and try that test out
(https://gist.github.com/982141).
r1101442.log:Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
9.888 sec
On May 18, 2011, at 11:14 AM, dsh wrote:
Aloha,
the SVN repo for the buildbot related stuff should be:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/bb-2008/slave4
I'm not sure what that one does. Here's the one that I've been working with:
The Logger class is maybe 10 years old. There maybe better ways to do stuff
now, but here's what it does...
On May 18, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
1, What's the benefit to use a customized logger factory with assigned
category ?
The i18n support is behind the logger API. Might
Going to be doing some big work on CDI+EJB integration.
First thing I think I'll probably do is move the CDI tck setup to another
package in container/, get those to run embedded and see if I can't get some
passes as quickly as possible.
Will post more later.
-David
We're probably way overdue for assessing our future committer situation. We
have some great people doing excellent work and some of them are probably
overdue or due for commit.
Shawn, you've incredibly active and are no doubt way overdue for commit.
Thanks to Ivan for helping Shawn out so
On May 10, 2011, at 7:01 AM, Bakalsky, Krum wrote:
Hi guys,
Considering the OpenEJB/Tomcat integration subproject, I was wondering
whether there have been some explorations for running this stack on top of
OSGi ? I mean RFC66 specification for web container integration (with, for
On May 2, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hello guys,
back after a week off (holidays).
I would like to know if we can plan the release for the 3.2.0?
This is a fork of the 3.1.x + JPA 2.0 and Bean Validation support.
As already discussed, the JPA 2 feature is one of the
to add more details on the failed
tck case.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:33 PM, David Blevins
david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks, Shawn for the notes and patch on OPENEJB-1531. If you could post
to any of the tck lists one or more of the affected tests, that would be
excellent.
David
Thanks, Shawn for the notes and patch on OPENEJB-1531. If you could post to
any of the tck lists one or more of the affected tests, that would be excellent.
David Jencks, if you could be persuaded to remember which TCK tests were
affected by OPENEJB-1328 and what lead to that fix, that would
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone shed some light on this ?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
# Specifies the time an invokation should wait for an instance
# of the pool to become available.
#
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
I met a NPE in
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.EjbJarBuilder.build(EjbJarInfo,
ListInjection) {
...
Container container = (Container) props.get(ejbInfo.containerId); //
containerId is null here
...
That's awesome!
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
the attached file didn't work, i put it here:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/file/n3466096/tomee-composite.png
--
View this message in context:
Hi Shawn!
Thanks for pointing this out. I committed something that should screen out
those invalid classes.
-David
On Apr 20, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Hi devs,
Any ideas on this issue ?
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool! I'm going to move all of our cdi setup code into a different module
since we can't run it in trunk anyway -- maven doesn't allow both junit and
testng in the same module.
Then maybe we can work on getting the bean validation tck setup.
-David
On Apr 20, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Jean-Louis
I use this in bash sometimes to quickly test something:
#!/bin/bash
for n in container/openejb-core assembly/openejb-tomcat/openejb-tomcat-webapp
assembly/openejb-tomcat/openejb-tomcat-bundle/tomee7; do
(cd $n mvn clean install $skip)
done
On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I use this in bash sometimes to quickly test something:
#!/bin/bash
for n in container/openejb-core assembly/openejb-tomcat/openejb-tomcat-webapp
assembly/openejb-tomcat/openejb-tomcat-bundle/tomee7; do
(cd $n mvn clean install $skip
Not complete and not release related. Just a list of things that came up at
one point or another as things that need doing or could be done.
Bean Validation
- Simple Integration (no descriptors)
- TCK Setup
- Descriptor Processing
CDI
- Scan for @Resource
- Recursive search for CDI beans
Thanks, Ivan.
I did for a brief moment take a look at them. I noticed one of the changes was
to always have a non-null List for parameters in MethodInfo (or a similar
Info).
I don't recall and this is something I should have written down if true, but I
think some code was relying on that
On Apr 10, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1516
When there's no timeout method but there's schedule info for methods in EJB
either from annotation or DD. The
org.apache.openejb.core.timer.TimerServiceWrapper.getTimerService() will
Looks like a bug.
-David
On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:14 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
ejb-example in 3.2.x branch is in version 1.0-SNAPSHOT but tomee look for
ejb-example 1.1-SNAPSHOT.
do i have this error?
- Romain
On Apr 8, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to test the 3.2.x with a simple jpa 2 application but i had some
issues. I took tomee tomcat 7 and the web.xml doesnt manage servlet v3 spec
:(.
In my application i used a singleton to init a database. I had a
Second annual Get-Together. No fees no conference and no sessions. Just an
excuse to get-together, code, and have a beer or two.
Hacking Monday - Thursday. Friday and the weekend is for non-technical fun.
Tech-time will likely be focusing on TomEE, Java EE 6 Web Profile and OSGi
hacking.
On Apr 4, 2011, at 9:48 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Tue Apr 5 04:48:20 2011
New Revision: 1088893
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088893view=rev
Log:
Looks like I accidentally blew away our very good logging.
Modified:
persistence
management
so i think i have to wait thiago work to do it on 3.2.x too. What's your
opinion about this change?
Romain
Le 3 avr. 2011 01:42, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
Seems like we might have to find a way to track which module a
PersistenceUnitInfo
works fine without thread state everything from there works fine -- i.e.
everything we pull out of the context and inject into the test case will
continue working after the bind(inject, testCase) process completes.
-David
2011/4/3 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Might have to attach
On Mar 6, 2011, at 3:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 6, 2011, at 12:52 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Hi,
What would people think of using the maven-bundle-plugin to assemble the
javaee-api jar instead of the shade plugin? I think the main difference
would be that the export packages
module is shared between modules so how can i link a validation
factory to a module in the entitymanager creation? Did i misunderstood the
spec?
- Romain
Le 2 avr. 2011 01:25, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
it was my
We're definitely heading in the right direction. We might need to tweak our
JSF support a bit. See tck@
Side note, check out the BackportUtil class. Probably can merge that
TomcatHelper right in.
-David
On Mar 31, 2011, at 4:19 PM, jgallim...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jgallimore
On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi all,
to implement bean validation, is it a good idea to do like it (i tried to
write something simple but understandable, say me if i failed ;)):
dev@openejb.apache.org1) create a builder ValidatorBuilder class
i) method
jar files, or uses
xbean-finder. What do you think?
Jon
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:00 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
We're definitely heading in the right direction. We might need to tweak
our JSF support a bit. See tck@
Side note, check out the BackportUtil class
as a String (would get us #4 at least).
#3 and #4 probably would require going all the way like we do for
persistence.xmls. Again, not sure if it is worth it and doesn't really need to
be done now.
The harder part is what to do in the Assembler anyway.
-David
2011/4/1 David Blevins david.blev
On Mar 30, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Rniamo wrote:
Hi all,
i would like to help Jean-Louis to implement bean validation in openejb but
i have some difficulties to understand how the jndi tree of openejb is
built.
What i saw:
1) JndiEncBuilder create a virtual binding (a map)
2) AutoConfig
On Mar 30, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi all,
I just thought I'd post to see whether any one had any views about our
PermGen space usage. I've noticed that when running TomEE from a recent
snapshot, when nothing but the basic openejb webapp is running, our PermGen
usage
I set it to 1.1.0, but go for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT if you want.
-David
On Mar 30, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Ivan wrote:
If no objection, I will upgrade the OWB to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, as I knew there
are still some TCK failures
2011/3/30 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I still
Getting some failures out of the assembly/openejb-jetty/openejb-jetty-common
module. Can't tell how long they've been failing. With the OWB changes it's
not possible to rollback too far and still get to that part of the build.
Took a quick stab at trying to fix them and seems I improved
- what do you think?
Guess we'll find out soon enough :)
-David
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:50 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Getting some failures out of the
assembly/openejb-jetty/openejb-jetty-common module. Can't tell how long
they've been failing. With the OWB changes
Wondering if maybe we should just have one zip (Tomcat 7) cleanly called:
apache-tomee-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
Which unzips to:
apache-tomee-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
We still have the drop in war, so people can easily do any version of Tomcat
they want. We won't actually be able to certify the Tomcat
, 2011 at 8:30 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Wondering if maybe we should just have one zip (Tomcat 7) cleanly called:
apache-tomee-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
Which unzips to:
apache-tomee-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
We still have the drop in war, so people can easily do any version
I've been meaning to say Thank You for those interceptor test (example)
several times now. I can't tell you how many times I've broken them. Not
uncommon to get through a whole build and one of them be the only failing test.
Shows how complete they are and how little we test things like
.
-David
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:44 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Since we're no longer really referring to the integration as OpenEJB-Tomcat,
I'm going to try to do some renaming in the assembly/ directory. Basically
disfavoring openejb-tomcat and favoring tomee
On Mar 25, 2011, at 7:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Since we're no longer really referring to the integration as OpenEJB-Tomcat,
I'm going to try to do some renaming in the assembly/ directory. Basically
disfavoring openejb-tomcat and favoring tomee instead.
Heads up! :)
Wait, just
(possibly up to 5 times per webapp).
A simple xml at least stands the chance to add a little unity to the scanning
for the app and can be used by any module. Say META-INF/scan.xml. Could even
be used to say don't scan me
-David
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:36 PM, David Blevins
david.blev
On Mar 25, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
I changed the version number of the 3.2.x branch to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT.
I did the same (not already commited) with 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT.
Don't we want 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT for our first Web Profile certified version?
3 digits is fine with me.
-David
Started to type this in the previous email and wow did it get too long
In general I'm still not sure what kind of properties we might want to use to
configure all this. Here's a sample of the xml I imagine:
An include based approach:
scanning
includes
FYI,
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/AnnotationFinder-2-0-td2716969.html
The big take on this side of the fence is the ability we'll have to do
filtering and the meta annotation support.
-David
Currently all our examples use the OpenEJB-specific InitialContext approach.
The main reason is that the Embedded API implementation is quite a bit
different and it isn't possible to switch from one to the other without changes.
One of the tricks to making them the same is that there is a spec
Excellent.
On Mar 21, 2011, at 5:21 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi all,
just to let you know I plan to update pom version of 3.2.x branch and also
of the trunk.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
as the examples
zip itself is versioned after the server and all the examples unzip into a
directory that is also versioned after the server.
Better to just keep the examples themselves as simple as possible.
-David
2011/3/21 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Excellent.
On Mar 21, 2011
On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
The first release to plan is the 3.2 based on Thiago's work to merge JPA 2
feature.
What could be a reasonable target? Mid-April?
We are getting bad feedback from users because the 3.2-SNAPSHOT is
We should probably remove one of them.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/jpa/unit/Persistence.java
added r446395 | dblevins | 2006-08-11 21:25:29 -0700 (Fri, 11 Aug 2006) | 2
lines
On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a couple of (probably silly) questions about our JSF support, I
wonder if someone can help me out?
- I notice we include myfaces-1.2 api and impl jars in our Tomcat
distribution - are we correct to do this? Shouldn't
On Mar 2, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Finally, i'm not in favour of merging JPA 2 changes in 3.1.x branch.
I would prefer to keep our 3.1.x branch Java EE 5 compatible.
So instead of merging JPA 2 to 3.1.x branch,
Same here. What if we just called that new codebase 3.2
I suspect most of us going to the April Get-Together won't be traveling for a
while afterwards.
Would be excellent to see you in Tours though! :)
For those that haven't had the pleasure of meeting Mohammad in person, he's one
of the nicest people you'll ever meet. One big heart. A couple
On Mar 1, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Yegor Bugayenko wrote:
If someone will be the lead architect, I would be glad to contribute as a
developer.
That's excellent, thanks. I personally don't have time, but we have a lot of
committers. Hoping someone will step up.
-David
On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:07 PM, David Blevins wrote:
How hard would it be to create a version of 3.1.4 that supports JPA 2.0 and
would anyone be interested doing that?
This got turned into an a or b discussion and I really meant it as an a and
b.
Let me try and rephrase. Absolutely we need
:
On it! It is a long way though... just got home and I'm downloading 3.1.4,
and then I will start to investigate it... ;O)
Any help on what should be changed is welcome.
[]s,
Thiago.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:07 PM, David
Thanks, Shawn!
-David
On Feb 28, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Shawn Jiang (JIRA) wrote:
Compilation error due to OpenWebbeans api changes.
--
Key: OPENEJB-1437
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1437
How hard would it be to create a version of 3.1.4 that supports JPA 2.0 and
would anyone be interested doing that?
-David
On Feb 22, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm digging into JAX-WS Web Services area and been meaning to
contribute a little bit to openejb to further enhance its
understanding.
I took a look at the openejb-cxf module and noticed there was a
dependency on Apache CXF 2.2.10
)
at
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.deployment.EjbModuleBuilder.createModule(EjbModuleBuilder.java:311)
... 46 more
[1]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/openejb3@1071152
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:54 PM, David Blevins
david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
I had to temporarily gut our webapp
We may not need it if we prune out the things from the JNDI tree we don't want
OpenEJB to build.
We used to use it as a way to merge the OpenEJB built JNDI tree with the
Geronimo built one. The OpenEJB one was in front and the Geronimo one was in
back. So the OpenEJB tree had links to all
://www.hoteldeschateaux.fr/
We could probably get a discount booking together.
Week commence 18th April should be ok for me. April 21st is actually my
birthday so it would be good to go for a beer with you all to celebrate if
possible.
Wonderful!!
-David
On 16/02/2011 21:24, David Blevins wrote
modules in the past. From Geronimo side, DeploymentLoader only needs to load
EjbModule and WsModule, but to make the codes also work correctly in OpenEJB
itself, DeploymentLoader has to create a dummy WebModule for discovering
EjbModule in the web application.
2011/2/17 David Blevins
On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi all,
Yes, Da Vinci lived/died in Amboise.
There is a museum http://www.vinci-closluce.com/en/
http://www.vinci-closluce.com/en/ , where we can spend time if you are
interested.
The good news is that my house is very closed
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:14 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi David,
I'm very interested on that topic as I cannot find anyway to run tck on
geronimo :-(
I did a lot of changes some weeks ago on the DeploymentLoader
It was working fine on all examples, itests ... but Geronimo tck
On a side note, Thiago and Andy, you guys should file NDAs as well so that you
can at least see the TCK reports and know what the status is:
Just need to sign/fax or email (secretary@a.o) this NDA:
http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf
-David
On Feb 14, 2011, at 9:29 AM, David Blevins
On Aug 4, 2010, at 12:22 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Any committer can request Java EE 6 TCK access via singing faxing or emailing
(secretary@a.o) this NDA:
http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf
Posted some info on running the TCK to tck@openejb.a.o. See link above if you
are an Apache
On Feb 10, 2011, at 8:15 AM, tjsaker wrote:
Container managed persistence using JPA. This is just a tutorial exercise.
Excellent. FYI, the term Container-Managed Persistence (CMP) and its inverse
Bean-Managed Persistence (BMP) do not apply to JPA. Both pertain only to EJB
2.x style
On Feb 10, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hey Jean-Louis,
It would be great if you did make over to the UK. I'm happy to try and
organize a venue of some kind over here if people want to meet up here.
I'm still very much up for coming to Paris though - it sounded like there
601 - 700 of 1653 matches
Mail list logo
