Hi,
We should but does anyone dev under win in the community?
- Romain
Le 28 déc. 2011 08:05, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com a écrit :
I think we should provide bundles of TomEE for win32 and win64. Those
should come pre-bundled with the files allowing to install it as a
service
:)
2011/12/28 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Hi,
We should but does anyone dev under win in the community?
- Romain
Le 28 déc. 2011 08:05, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com a écrit :
I think we should provide bundles of TomEE for win32 and win64. Those
should come pre
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Romain Manni-Bucau closed TOMEE-57.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Romain Manni-Bucau
done. Thanks for the contribution!
Examples documentation
--
From: Daniel Siwiec (Updated) (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date: 2011/12/26
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (TOMEE-57) Examples documentation improvement
To: daniel.siw...@gmail.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
) :(
- Romain
-- Forwarded message --
From: rmannibu...@apache.org
Date: 2011/12/4
Subject: svn commit: r1210265 - in /openejb/trunk/openejb:
arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/
arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-embedded/src/main
-td3879038.html
Can you please apply it ?
-Vishwa
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/tomee-webapp-tp4096196p4103578.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Nov 22, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
*
*
Since we cjhanged our website i think we should change our webapp too.
Obviously i think the look should be close.
However i would like to change the way it is done. Today it was jsp but i
think it can be clearer to use
Same here.
i added some stuff, (still on code google), but if somebody knows JSF2 some
help will be appreciated ;).
in particular on the way to share values between pages, i'm not sure what
is the good way to do.
- Romain
2011/11/22 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Nov 22, 2011, at
:
trying to cleanup a bit arquillian stuff to avoid bad deployment and issue
dur to not updated jar
Modified:
openejb/trunk/openejb/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/FileUtils.java
openejb/trunk/openejb/arquillian-tomee/arquillian
-tomee/arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/FileUtils.java
openejb/trunk/openejb/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/TomEEContainer.java
openejb/trunk/openejb/arquillian-tomee/arquillian
- in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee: ./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/
arquillian-tomee-remote/
arquillian-tomee-remote/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/remote/
arquillian-to...
À : comm...@openejb.apache.org
Author
is not enough?
- Romain
-- Message transféré --
De : jgallim...@apache.org
Date : 27 oct. 2011 01:08
Objet : svn commit: r1189526 - in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee:
./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common
: r1189526 - in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee:
./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/
arquillian-tomee-remote/
arquillian-tomee-remote/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/remote/
arquillian-to...
À : comm
) work with other
containers, so my view is that they should work with TomEE just by adding
the profiles for our adapters to the pom.xml and the settings to
arquillian.xml.
Do you any objection if we use the EJB/CDI enricher code I put in the remote
adapter the other day in both adapters?
I'm
view is that they should work with TomEE just by adding
the profiles for our adapters to the pom.xml and the settings to
arquillian.xml.
Do you any objection if we use the EJB/CDI enricher code I put in the
remote
adapter the other day in both adapters?
I'm presenting at JAX on Tuesday
i'm making it working in embedded mode now, just some minute to let me
commited
PS: i really would like to avoid to contribute our own enricher if it is not
something directly linked to openejb
- Romain
2011/10/28 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:27
your remote test case works
do i let you the surprise of the solution i used?
- Romain
2011/10/28 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
i'm making it working in embedded mode now, just some minute to let me
commited
PS: i really would like to avoid to contribute our own enricher if it
I haven't had a chance to check it out yet, but I definitely appreciate your
efforts - many thanks! Not quite sure what do i let you the surprise of the
solution i used? means, but I'll definitely check out your solution and
make sure I understand it :-).
Thanks
Jon
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:09
i just tried a kind of joke (sorry ;)) and i was asking if you wanted
suspense or not
- Romain
2011/10/28 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
I haven't had a chance to check it out yet, but I definitely appreciate
your
efforts - many thanks! Not quite sure what do i let you the
Hehe.. I'll go for the surprise :) - I'll give it a go as soon as I can.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
i just tried a kind of joke (sorry ;)) and i was asking if you wanted
suspense or not
- Romain
2011/10/28 Jonathan Gallimore
Objet : svn commit: r1189526 - in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee: ./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/
arquillian-tomee-remote/
arquillian-tomee-remote/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/remote/
arquillian-to...
À : comm...@openejb.apache.org
commit: r1189526 - in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee: ./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/
arquillian-tomee-remote/
arquillian-tomee-remote/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/remote/
arquillian-to...
À : comm...@openejb.apache.org
Author
is not enough?
- Romain
-- Message transféré --
De : jgallim...@apache.org
Date : 27 oct. 2011 01:08
Objet : svn commit: r1189526 - in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee: ./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common/
arquillian-tomee
...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Why beanmanager stuff is not enough?
- Romain
-- Message transféré --
De : jgallim...@apache.org
Date : 27 oct. 2011 01:08
Objet : svn commit: r1189526 - in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee: ./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb
Hi,
Why beanmanager stuff is not enough?
- Romain
-- Message transféré --
De : jgallim...@apache.org
Date : 27 oct. 2011 01:08
Objet : svn commit: r1189526 - in /openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee: ./
arquillian-tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/common
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:18 PM, jgallim...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jgallimore
Date: Sun Oct 9 21:18:38 2011
New Revision: 1180717
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180717view=rev
Log:
TOMEE-4 added Selenium test to Moviefun example
...
Modified:
openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:47 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Mon Oct 10 13:47:49 2011
New Revision: 1180962
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180962view=rev
Log:
upgrading hsqldb to version 2.2.4
...
Modified:
sure
- Romain
2011/10/13 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:47 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Mon Oct 10 13:47:49 2011
New Revision: 1180962
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180962view=rev
Log:
upgrading hsqldb to version
Sorry, committing that was a mistake. I'll change it back. For info, I did
that because the schema on oracle's site was unavailable. The effect was
that TomEE would take 70 seconds to deploy this app, and it would then fail
as soon as any persistence method was called. I havent dug too deep
(jndi tree in particular)
Modified:
openejb/trunk/openejb/assembly/tomee/tomee-embedded/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/embedded/Container.java
Modified:
openejb/trunk/openejb/assembly/tomee/tomee-embedded/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/embedded/Container.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org
/viewvc?rev=1182610view=rev
Log:
return AppContext from embedded container to be able to get information
fro mthe context (jndi tree in particular)
Modified:
openejb/trunk/openejb/assembly/tomee/tomee-embedded/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/embedded/Container.java
Modified
was
that TomEE would take 70 seconds to deploy this app, and it would then fail
as soon as any persistence method was called. I havent dug too deep, but it
looks like OpenJPA relies on the xsd being available.
Jon
On Oct 13, 2011 7:18 PM, Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9
Reverted in revision 1183085.
Jon
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, committing that was a mistake. I'll change it back. For info, I did
that because the schema on oracle's site was unavailable. The effect was
that TomEE would take
:(
- Romain
2011/10/13 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
Sorry, committing that was a mistake. I'll change it back. For info, I
did
that because the schema on oracle's site was unavailable. The effect was
that TomEE would take 70 seconds to deploy this app, and it would then
fail
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:07 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Sun Oct 9 02:07:20 2011
New Revision: 1180517
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180517view=rev
Log:
OPENEJB-1697: TomEE related renaming
nameOpenEJB :: Assembly :: Tomcat/name
nameOpenEJB
+1 for tomee instead of tomcat
Le 9 oct. 2011 14:02, Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:07 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Sun Oct 9 02:07:20 2011
New Revision: 1180517
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180517view=rev
Log
As Romain mentioned earlier, we should check for WEB-INF, because
thats the directory which is guaranteed to be present in a web
application.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep openejb-core is not linked to tomcat but is linked to jee and webapps.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
As Romain mentioned earlier, we should check for WEB-INF, because
thats the directory which is guaranteed to be present in a web
application.
Is it? Even though I believe WEB-INF is a better bet, it's not
required as
Aha.. I did not know that - thanks!. One of the possible checks could
be detection of jsp files. We could scan the CATALINA_BASE/web.xml and
find the suffix mapping for org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet. For
example, if the suffix is mapped to *.jsp and if we find a foo.jsp,
then we know it is
Oops!, I mean't $CATALINA_BASE/conf/web.xml
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Aha.. I did not know that - thanks!. One of the possible checks could
be detection of jsp files. We could scan the CATALINA_BASE/web.xml and
find the suffix mapping for
Done ;) and web-fragment too
- Romain
Le 9 oct. 2011 18:10, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com a écrit :
As Romain mentioned earlier, we should check for WEB-INF, because
thats the directory which is guaranteed to be present in a web
application.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Romain
i thought web-inf was not optionnal...
http://download.oracle.com/javaee/6/tutorial/doc/bnadx.html it seems web.xml
is optionnal (of course) but not WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes even if
they are empty...
i can't access to jcp website now (i got timeouts) :(
- Romain
2011/10/9 Karan Malhi
of fallback test can be sufficient: if web-inf
exist
return webmodule, no?
I'm looking into it - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1695
While we're at it, how is your development environment set up? Do you
use IDEA, NetBeans, Eclipse? How do you debug tomee? I need some
guidance
...and maybe an jee example project too
Le 8 oct. 2011 21:37, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit :
I wanted to talk about it earlier with the svn refactoting, do we create a
tomee project?
- Romain
Le 8 oct. 2011 21:32, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit
On Mar 25, 2011, at 7:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Since we're no longer really referring to the integration as OpenEJB-Tomcat,
I'm going to try to do some renaming in the assembly/ directory. Basically
disfavoring openejb-tomcat and favoring tomee instead.
Heads up! :)
Never got
Still setting it up, but here it is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE
-David
On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I wanted to talk about it earlier with the svn refactoting, do we create a
tomee project?
- Romain
Le 8 oct. 2011 21:32, David Blevins
Looking forward to the renaming
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:31 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 27, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hello David,
I like the TomEE name! :)
I am wondering how the things are going regarding TCK for WebProfile?
Are you guys
Added some minor textual changes to dashboard's index.jsp
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1697 here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1697
-Vishwa
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Some-more-TomEE-related-renaming-tp3406880p3886077
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:31 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we should even start a JIRA project for TomEE?
It has it's own version number and probably easier for people to understand.
I'm so glad you've mentioned it! That's the solution I've been
awaiting as I didn't
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm your fix needs context.xml so you could have added an empty web.xml too.
I still think testing web-inf is more relevant no?
You're right, but it wasn't me who created context.xml file - it's
netbeans and I don't
Yep openejb-core is not linked to tomcat but is linked to jee and webapps.
The best could be to scan webXXX annotations but i still think it is
useless.
I'll have a try tmr.
- Romain
Le 8 oct. 2011 23:20, Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Romain
what about a sketched cat face 'smoking' the OpenEJB chilly?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: tomee
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau (Commented) (JIRA)
j...@apache.org wrote:
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OPENEJB-1694:
-
please check your dependencies, i just tried and it works perfectly.
i tried with google CODI examples.
i propose to remove jars from its webapp (i'm pretty sure it is the problem
since i had the same downloading an example).
tomcat and openejb shouldn't be touched.
- Romain
2011/10/6 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau (Commented) (JIRA)
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
i propose to remove jars from its webapp (i'm pretty sure it is the problem
since i had the same downloading an example).
tomcat and openejb shouldn't be touched.
Ah, thanks Romain for your patience to elaborate
on OPENEJB-1694:
This solution would remove the JEE6 Stack from TomEE? The examples from
(http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/myfaces-codi-examples/) are
using CODI for Transaction Management. My prefered solution is a JEE6 Stack
this is a common issue, i wrote a small utility about it:
http://code.google.com/p/rmannibucau/source/browse/util/lib-helper/src/main/java/fr/rmannibucau/libhelper/Main.java
- Romain
2011/10/6 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
i played a bit with tomcat logo:
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee.svg
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee-certified.svg
here the png version (FF chrome doesn't support shades :():
http
2011/10/6 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
i played a bit with tomcat logo:
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee.svg
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee-certified.svg
here the png version (FF
Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
i played a bit with tomcat logo:
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee.svg
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee-certified.svg
here the png version (FF chrome doesn't support shades :():
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee.png
Our home page includes another page dedicated to TomEE. Reorganised
the TomEE page, but changes not showing up. Have to run to catch a
train, but if anybody could look into it, that would be great. I am
missing something really simple here, so even if you can tell me how
to make it happen, I
On Oct 5, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Our home page includes another page dedicated to TomEE. Reorganised
the TomEE page, but changes not showing up.
Just need to select our spaces and click rebuild spaces
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/admin/autoexport/configuration.action
Thanks!.
Okay, home page updated. Add/remove/change as you see fit. Would be
cool to somehow show the number of visits on the home page as well as
the downloads page. Any suggestions on how to have that on the pages?
Did we configure our twitter to show TomEE tweets on the home page? We
need to do
i played a bit with tomcat logo:
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee.svg
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee-certified.svg
here the png version (FF chrome doesn't support shades :():
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/tomee.png
- Romain
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-webprofile.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache
/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-webprofile.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache
/openejb/openejb/4.0.0-beta-1/openejb-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1
-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-webprofile.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb
/apache/openejb/openejb/4.0.0-beta-1/openejb-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1
/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-webprofile.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache
-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-webprofile.tar.gz
org
-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1
/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-023/
Src:
org/apache/openejb/openejb/4.0.0-beta-1/openejb-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1
-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-023/
Src:
org/apache/openejb/openejb/4.0.0-beta-1/openejb-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb
Updated the tomee-embedded module which has an embeddable version of TomEE.
With a couple tweaks we're now using the same embedded code that Tomcat uses in
its internal tests and things are pretty fast.
Running in my IDE I've seen speeds as low as 1.8s, but normally around 2.5 or
2.8s
Here's what I've seen so far:
LICENSE: looks like the W3C license is missing. OpenEJB source includes W3C
licensed schemas, but the W3C license is missing from the LICENSE file.
Build failure -- I had a build failure in CDI TomEE. Anyone else seeing that?
[INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: CDI TomEE
. apache-tomee already contain the attribution, just
needed in the a few more places...
Everything else looked good. Once the above/preceding problems are fixed, I'll
be +1.
Great job pulling this together, David!
--kevan
On Oct 1, 2011, at 2:17 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok, the new binaries are up
is missing CDDL, and W3C licenses.
I see that several NOTICE files (source NOTICE file, NOTICE in openejb-jee
jar) need an attribution in the NOTICE files to meet the CDDL requirements.
The binary distributions (e.g. apache-tomee already contain the attribution,
just needed in the a few more places
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 1:03 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Calling Apache TomEE a 4.0.0-beta-1 is a big mistake.
Should be Apache TomEE a 1.0.0-beta-1.
I agree.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere - http://blog.japila.pl
Warszawa JUG
.
I see that several NOTICE files (source NOTICE file, NOTICE in openejb-jee
jar) need an attribution in the NOTICE files to meet the CDDL requirements.
The binary distributions (e.g. apache-tomee already contain the
attribution, just needed in the a few more places...
Everything else
and CDDL license/noticed information to openejb-jee and
the source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-023/
Src:
org/apache/openejb/openejb/4.0.0-beta-1/openejb-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
Bin:
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1
/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-plus.zip
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1/apache-tomee-1.0.0-beta-1-webprofile.tar.gz
org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.0.0-beta-1
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
- fixed SNAPSHOT references in src
- Added missing CDDL license to the source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-019/
Src:
org
for the version change.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:03 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just remember a thought I had before going to bed last night
Calling Apache TomEE a 4.0.0-beta-1 is a big mistake.
Should be Apache TomEE a 1.0.0-beta-1.
I think we're probably working against
last night
Calling Apache TomEE a 4.0.0-beta-1 is a big mistake.
Should be Apache TomEE a 1.0.0-beta-1.
I think we're probably working against ourselves by not making it as new
and exciting as possible. Some people might be confused 4.0? why haven't
I
heard of this before, it must suck
Lets get this done!!.
Here is my +1
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:17 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
- fixed SNAPSHOT references in src
- Added missing CDDL license
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:17 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
- fixed SNAPSHOT references in src
- Added missing CDDL license to the source
to
release TomEE ASAP. David blevins will be talking at JavaOne and its a
great opportunity to atleast let the folks know about TomEE. Timing
wise , this is a superb opportunity for releasing a shiny brand new
TomEE.
2. Website: Replace the current home page of OpenEJB with something
like this: http
of the things we can do towards having a fantastic release:
1. Release soon. JavaOne is next week, and we defintely want to
release TomEE ASAP. David blevins will be talking at JavaOne and its a
great opportunity to atleast let the folks know about TomEE. Timing
wise , this is a superb
+1
Jon
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:52 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:17 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
at 8:17 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
- fixed SNAPSHOT references in src
- Added missing CDDL license to the source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org
of the things we can do towards having a fantastic release:
1. Release soon. JavaOne is next week, and we defintely want to
release TomEE ASAP. David blevins will be talking at JavaOne and its a
great opportunity to atleast let the folks know about TomEE. Timing
wise , this is a superb opportunity
Ok! I think it's voting time. I've rolled a few binaries and worked out every
little license detail and finally got something I think is probably the best
set of binaries we've rolled.
The tag and repo:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-1/
Forgot my +1!
-David
On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok! I think it's voting time. I've rolled a few binaries and worked out
every little license detail and finally got something I think is probably the
best set of binaries we've rolled.
The tag and repo:
Are you able to access the html file on people.apache.org at the moment?
Looks like I can't get a http connection to that machine either from home or
work at the moment. I'm really keen to check to check that out.
Thanks for rolling this, I'm going to try and get a bit of time to look at
it in
p.a.o is not working for me either at the time.
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you able to access the html file on people.apache.org at the moment?
Looks like I can't get a http connection to that machine either from
Is this the source release that we are voting on?
openejb-4.0.0-beta-1-source-release.zip in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-012/org/apache/openejb/openejb/4.0.0-beta-1/
--kevan
On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok! I think it's voting
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
I think all you need to do is use http://localhost:8080/openejb/ejb as the
provider URL (swap 8080 for your http port if its different):
Properties p = new Properties();
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-012/archives.html seems
to be working for me now. Nice report!
Jon
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:40 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
p.a.o is not working for me either at the time.
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM,
The reporting tool looks really great.
Would be nice to add a goal for it to rat maven plugin.
Anyway, looks great.
Everything also compiles on my laptop.
Will give it another try tonight.
Jean-Louis
2011/9/30 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
701 - 800 of 840 matches
Mail list logo
