We are going to use their library with no modifications, so this is not the
case?
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alexei Fedotov
alexei.fedo...@gmail.comwrote:
This licensing incompatibility applies *only* when some Apache project
software becomes a derivative work of some GPLv3 software,
I disagree
AFAIK derived means you have changes something and include changed library
to your product.
According to the link below:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.en.html
In addition to clarifying the rules about licenses that are already
GPL-compatible, GPLv3 is also newly
Hello legal folks,
One of openmeetings contributors asks if we can use GPL v3 (no
optional clauses) library in our product. I think that so-called
compatibility with APL is only one way compatibility [1] and we still
cannot use GPL-ed products in our code. Could you please comment on
this?
[1]
Thanks, Christian.
Maxim, I'm sorry, we cannot have a dependency from GPL v3 library.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Christian Müller
christian.muel...@gmail.com wrote:
You
Hello Maxim,
too quickly going are we.
So what is the problem with chat when talking about admin modularity?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
Hello Alexei,
First of all it is unclear to me WHY should we separate admin.
It will be impossible to have open websocket if user will close/open pages
this is why we agreed to use single page ajax interface
After switching to 2 applications mode the things will getting even worst.
On Thu, Apr
The compatibility is one way. Apache code can go into GPL licensed works,
but not the other way around.
This is possible because our licence is permissive and adds no additional
requirements to the GPL. Going the other way the reciprocal provisions of
the GPL mean that one can no longer
As explained in the legal list the compatibility is one way, Apache code in
GPL code. If we include GPL we invoke the reciprocal clauses and thus must
distribute as GPL.
In practice we often find projects are willing to dual license if we ask
nicely. It depends on why they chose GPL in the first
Thanks Ross,
I'll try to contact developers
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
As explained in the legal list the compatibility is one way, Apache code in
GPL code. If we include GPL we invoke the reciprocal clauses and thus must
distribute as
Having two apps to maintain sounds to me even more work then having one app.
I think we have enough work upfront with the HTML5 interface.
From my experience you normally try to integrate as much as possible into a
single app, not the other way round.
Compare for example other web-application
Please review my proposal
https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/rahul_bhola/1
regards
Rahul
Bits Pilani
India
Maxim:
I'm continuing my testing of AEC in OM 2.1.1 Revision: 1467936 Ubuntu 12.04.
Are there any system settings that affect AEC that I can change. You mentioned
a buffer length below.
Thanks
Joseph Karwat | 415-462-0263 | JellVideo | www.jellnet.com |
JELL NETWORKS, INC.
Enterprise
Maxim Solodovnik wrote on Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 15:03:55 +0700:
Hello Christian,
Sorry for double asking, but GPLv3 licence has special NOTE it is
compatible with APLv2, Is it possible the page you have mentioned applied
to GPLv2 and earlier?
s/APLv2/ALv2/
WebContent/swf10/screensharing/screenSharingDialog.lzx
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Nick Jolin njo...@jolinco.com wrote:
I would like to modify the auto-height of the screen share window to
something like 75% of screen height. When the window grows to 100%, it
makes it difficult to
14 matches
Mail list logo
