sebawagner commented on issue #100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/issues/100#issuecomment-941890485
This information is already available. You can browse the list of KStreams
now in the Admin>Connections.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
sebawagner closed issue #100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/issues/100
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
sebawagner closed issue #163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/issues/163
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
sebawagner commented on issue #163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/issues/163#issuecomment-941890217
I am not sure, but I think this is a question. And yes, you can record and
share your video at the same time.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
lizige closed issue #143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/issues/143
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
lizige opened a new issue #163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/issues/163
Can video recording and video sharing are not the same person
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
OFFTOPIC: I don't really like webpack-and-friends, it's output is often
unpredictable and hard to debug.
Additionally I have difficulties to set it up to do what I need
This is why I'm trying to find something that "just works" and produces no
damage :)
Your offtopic sounds more like a rant :)
>
> Also I don't really like all these JS frameworks
> I believe the content should be controlled on server
=> There is no framework change, your understanding of PWA and saving to
home screen I think is based on a misunderstanding. Or you mixing it with
other topics around the other email thread
Let me try out to see how many changes are required. And then we can see. I
think your understanding of PWA is a misunderstanding. It's nothing else
than an alternative way of a browser. So you can control a few more aspects
more explicitly.
It is not rewriting the JS or HTML files. Or changing
Why is it a rewrite?
All you do is add a manifest file. In order to make saving to the Home
Screen easier.
What other change do you expect?
Thx
Sebastian
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 4:32 AM, Ali Alhaidary
wrote:
> I second @Max
>
> Ali
>
> On 10/12/21 5:30 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > Hello
I second @Max
Ali
On 10/12/21 5:30 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Hello Seb,
I'm not happy with converting to PWA
This will mean to convert OM to JS+REST i.e. rewrite it completely one more
time
I doubt I can do another rewrite
Also I don't really like all these JS frameworks
I believe the
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 03:41, seba.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
> >
> > The project is responsible for the 3rd party components/libraries it uses
> > I try to check the license of JS components (but not their trees)
>
> Re license checking, we could explore using:
>
Hello Seb,
I'm not happy with converting to PWA
This will mean to convert OM to JS+REST i.e. rewrite it completely one more
time
I doubt I can do another rewrite
Also I don't really like all these JS frameworks
I believe the content should be controlled on server
But this is an open source
13 matches
Mail list logo
