+1
Best regards, Oliver.
On 22.09.2013 10:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the RC3 release candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1. This will be an important update release for
Apache OpenOffice 4.0 to fix some serious regressions and to introduce
some new la
The defunct Peformance project on OpenOffice used to handle good testing
for cold start performance under different OS. I wonder with the new
version of AOO coming up, how does it match to the previous versions. Link
here:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Performance/Achievements_Windows_Startup#Gen
Where did you download the software from?
Apache OpenOffice can only be download from SourceForge software center.
On 9/23/13, Bill Ziegler wrote:
> My virus software picks up a virus when trying to download your latest
> software. One is "s0GzNmS6.exe.part",the other one is "4x6z9SSj.exe.part".
My virus software picks up a virus when trying to download your latest
software. One is "s0GzNmS6.exe.part",the other one is "4x6z9SSj.exe.part".
They could also be ad ware,but still makes them impossible to download them
on my computer.
Thank you !
Bill
We can do this with a custom 404 as well, and no JS needed.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> JS was to automatically send you back (or send you to the homepage like the
> example). Using:
> history.back()
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
JS was to automatically send you back (or send you to the homepage like the
example). Using:
history.back()
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> > I notice a lot of dead links gives a horrible default error. Can we
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the RC3 release candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1. This will be an important update release for
Apache OpenOffice 4.0 to fix some serious regressions and to introduce
some new languages (Basque, Khmer, Lithuaian, Polish, Ser
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I notice a lot of dead links gives a horrible default error. Can we put a
> more "design friendly" error handler for missing or outdated links. Also
> add some Javascript to redirect back to homepage (or back page).
>
>
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the RC3 release candidate as
> Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1. This will be an important update release for
> Apache OpenOffice 4.0 to fix some serious regressions and to introduce
> some new languag
Michal Hriň wrote:
I found some issues that can be closed (verified? status).
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92297
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=62453
How can I do this ?
Set them as RESOLVED-FIXED (if appropriate), then you have the
possibility to set them as VE
when i was going to test the example(RNG) which you provided in
calc/Add-in/Simple Calc Add-In in Apache open office wiki I got the error
"cannot find -luno_cppuhelpergcc3
x" while exucuting make file. Can you give a solution for this problem?
I notice a lot of dead links gives a horrible default error. Can we put a
more "design friendly" error handler for missing or outdated links. Also
add some Javascript to redirect back to homepage (or back page).
function delayer(){
Hi,
I found some issues that can be closed (verified? status).
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92297
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=62453
How can I do this ?
Regards,
Michal Hriň
-
To unsubscrib
Hello - good day,
the extension "Last Session Multi" did not work on OO 4.0 for me.
Is this a common issue or is it a problem on my side.
I can install this Extension, but I have no access to it.
In OO 3.4 two buttons "Save session" and "load Session" were installed, but
not in 4.0; I can´t s
Please have a look at
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122035that bug deals
with this specific issue.
rgds
jan I.
On 23 September 2013 18:54, janI wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher wrote:
>
>> Hello bugreporter
>>
>> Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte
On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hello bugreporter
>
> Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com:
>
> That's awesome Andrea, many thanks.
>>
>> Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which devs do not
>> work on AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and
Hello bugreporter
Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com:
That's awesome Andrea, many thanks.
Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which devs do not work on AOO and are
still assigned to bugs, and remove them from the bugs "Assigned To:"
field?
This is a good ide
Thanks a lot Herbert for your detail information and confirmation, then we
will only do BVT level test on RC3 and leverage test results on RC2.
Regards,
Yu Zhen
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> Hi Yuzhen,
>
> On 22.09.2013 10:47, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
>
>> For RC3, could you
That's awesome Andrea, many thanks.
Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which devs do not work on
AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and remove them from the bugs "Assigned To:"
field?
I was thinking of something like this:
#1 get all emailaddresses from the devs which are assign
Hi Yuzhen,
On 22.09.2013 10:47, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
For RC3, could you please share a little bit more on the impact to the
functions of the AOO, from testing perspective? QE have been doing RC build
acceptance test on RC1 and RC2 from last week, we'd like to know then
evaluate what level test we n
Hi Yuzhen,
On 22.09.2013 10:47, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
For RC3, could you please share a little bit more on the impact to the
functions of the AOO, from testing perspective? QE have been doing RC build
acceptance test on RC1 and RC2 from last week, we'd like to know then
evaluate what level test we n
21 matches
Mail list logo
