Re: Automating Error-prone Manual Release-related Files By Using Centralized Release Artifact Metadata

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: > > Every time we release we need to generate quite a few files related to > > the release. > > > > Here's the list I know of: > > > > 1) The ASC/SHA/MD5 hashes and signature files, one for every released > file > > We're usi

Re: [FOSDEM-Devrooms] FOSDEM 2014 devroom proposal: Apache OpenOffice

On 2013-09-15 20:53:48 (+0200), Philip Paeps wrote: > On 2013-09-15 20:44:30 (+0200), Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > (sent on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC: http://s.apache.org/9hx ) > > > > * Devroom name: > > > > Apache OpenOffice > > ACK from devro...@fosdem.org. Your proposal arrived sa

Re: [download page] experience with updated download page

Am 10/02/2013 09:26 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 10/01/2013 09:55 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 10/01/2013 09:22 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 01.10.2013 20:52, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: [snip] But in another thread I mentioned that on my system (Windows 7 64bit English) in

Re: [RELEASE 4.0.1][Product Update Notification Service] updated XML feeds for the former versions to be notified about version 4.0.1

Am 10/02/2013 11:21 PM, schrieb FR web forum: So, there is no separate webpage needed. However, there is an additional webpage to tell the user how to use checksums: http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums.html Thanks but this page and followings are not localized. Difficult for french user

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Who needs whitelisting too? Your CWiki username please (and 24 hours of >>> patience!). >> I've enabled the following people > > And I've now whitelisted the following too: > > ~janiversen Jan Iversen > > ~vladaeg vlad

[HowTo] Video about how to go to the profile of Apache OpenOffice

Hi at all I created a Video about how to go to the Apache OpenOffice Profile on mac. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41vH7MVC6b0 Greetings Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional c

Re: [RELEASE 4.0.1][Product Update Notification Service] updated XML feeds for the former versions to be notified about version 4.0.1

>So, there is no separate webpage needed. However, there is an additional >webpage to tell the user how to use checksums: >http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums.html Thanks but this page and followings are not localized. Difficult for french users to understand the process. So I think that

Re: [Discuss-proposal]Admin mail box for NLs forum

On 2 October 2013 22:18, Ricardo Berlasso wrote: > New forum users with registration problems do not have an easy way to > communicate their problems to the board. In the past there was an email > address that sent an automated message to a particular forum thread on the > private forum area. Thi

[Discuss-proposal]Admin mail box for NLs forum

New forum users with registration problems do not have an easy way to communicate their problems to the board. In the past there was an email address that sent an automated message to a particular forum thread on the private forum area. This system is not working since the move to Apache. Until the

Re: Una nueva fuente de descargas de software - http://www.openoffice.org/es/

2013/10/2 anita : La Lista a la que escribiste es una lista en ingles. > Encontré su sitio web mientras buscaba software, y encontré su sitio web muy > interesante J Es un proyecto de software libre. Las descargas se hacen desde los mirrors de Sourceforge. > Note que están dando el enlace a

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

Am 10/02/2013 06:43 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ top posting ] Thank yo so much for this information. It will be a big help in our troubleshooting. In any case, I hope you were able to download Apache OpenOffice. The information below do not show a problem. The language and platform is recognize

Re: Una nueva fuente de descargas de software - http://www.openoffice.org/es/

Hola, La lista de correo a la que has escrito es en inglés. Puedes o bien repetir tu pregunta en inglés o utilizar la lista de correo en español: general...@openoffice.apache.org Saludos, Ricardo El 2 de octubre de 2013 18:30, anita escribió: > Hola, > > Encontré su sitio web mientras busca

Re: [RELEASE 4.0.1][Product Update Notification Service] updated XML feeds for the former versions to be notified about version 4.0.1

Am 10/02/2013 03:49 PM, schrieb FR web forum: Hello list, Before with v.4.0.0, we have a page dedicated to MD5 checksums. h**p://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/4.0.0_checksums.html Is it possible to set up another one for 4.0.1? While AOO 4.0.0 was the most recent version I've added th

Re: [download page] experience with updated download page

Am 10/01/2013 09:55 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 10/01/2013 09:22 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, On 01.10.2013 20:52, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: [snip] But in another thread I mentioned that on my system (Windows 7 64bit English) in Internet Explorer 8 the table on http://www.ope

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

Am 10/02/2013 01:15 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Andrea Pescetti wrote: Who needs whitelisting too? Your CWiki username please (and 24 hours of patience!). I've enabled the following people who edited the English Release Notes page and people who asked for access: ChriStef ~christef (this is C

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

Andrea Pescetti wrote: Andrea Pescetti wrote: Who needs whitelisting too? Your CWiki username please (and 24 hours of patience!). I've enabled the following people And I've now whitelisted the following too: ~janiversen Jan Iversen ~vladaeg vladimir stevanovic ~smansour Samer Mansour Agai

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

On 2 October 2013 19:07, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > > Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > >> Who needs whitelisting too? Your CWiki username please (and 24 hours of > >> patience!). > >> > > > > I've enabled the following people who edited the Engli

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> Who needs whitelisting too? Your CWiki username please (and 24 hours of >> patience!). >> > > I've enabled the following people who edited the English Release Notes > page and people who asked for access: > ChriS

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

[ top posting ] Thank yo so much for this information. It will be a big help in our troubleshooting. In any case, I hope you were able to download Apache OpenOffice. On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Ludek Rosendorf wrote: > Hi, > > Just testes it again and the problem is still there. That is w

Una nueva fuente de descargas de software - http://www.openoffice.org/es/

Hola, Encontré su sitio web mientras buscaba software, y encontré su sitio web muy interesante J Note que están dando el enlace a http://www.openoffice.org/es/ de la página http://www.portalprogramas.com/ Yo formo parte de un pr

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

I also use the CWiki to document marketing activities. Username is smansour -Samer On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Vladislav Stevanovic < stevanovicvladis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > About permission for translating and editing cwiki on Serbia, I am > interesting for that too. > > Regards,

Re: Some annoying building issues on Win7 (AOO 4.0.0)

Hi, On 02.10.2013 17:29, Yuri Myasoedov wrote: 02.10.2013, 19:22, "Oliver-Rainer Wittmann" : Ok. I will give it a try to do it via the source tarball. May be I am able to reproduce the problems you are facing. I always used "svn checkout" in a cygwin shell. Thanks. I have just one request --

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Building comphelper

Hi Raymond, On 02.10.2013 17:26, Steele, Raymond wrote: I have hit a stop work on the Solaris 10 port for now. We are in the process of moving over to Solaris 11. I will probably need to port OpenOffice to Solaris 11 soon. Thanks for the update! With the newer build environment there things

Re: Some annoying building issues on Win7 (AOO 4.0.0)

Hi, On 02.10.2013 17:16, Yuri Myasoedov wrote: 02.10.2013, 19:09, "Oliver-Rainer Wittmann" : Hi, On 01.10.2013 11:20, Yuri Myasoedov wrote: Hi! I've found some annoying issues while building AOO (4.0.0) on Win7 (32-bit). 1. Some modules are built with wrong permissions. I have to f

Re: Some annoying building issues on Win7 (AOO 4.0.0)

02.10.2013, 19:22, "Oliver-Rainer Wittmann" : > Ok. > I will give it a try to do it via the source tarball. May be I am able > to reproduce the problems you are facing. > > I always used "svn checkout" in a cygwin shell. Thanks. I have just one request -- when you will be trying, please remove su

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Building comphelper

Herbert, I have hit a stop work on the Solaris 10 port for now. We are in the process of moving over to Solaris 11. I will probably need to port OpenOffice to Solaris 11 soon. -Original Message- From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 11:58 AM To:

Re: Some annoying building issues on Win7 (AOO 4.0.0)

Hi, On 02.10.2013 17:16, Yuri Myasoedov wrote: 02.10.2013, 19:09, "Oliver-Rainer Wittmann" : Hi, On 01.10.2013 11:20, Yuri Myasoedov wrote: Hi! I've found some annoying issues while building AOO (4.0.0) on Win7 (32-bit). 1. Some modules are built with wrong permissions. I have to f

Re: Some annoying building issues on Win7 (AOO 4.0.0)

02.10.2013, 19:09, "Oliver-Rainer Wittmann" : > Hi, > > On 01.10.2013 11:20, Yuri Myasoedov wrote: > >>  Hi! >> >>  I've found some annoying issues while building AOO (4.0.0) on Win7 >>  (32-bit). >> >>  1. Some modules are built with wrong permissions. I have to fix it >>  manually with chmod. Som

Re: Some annoying building issues on Win7 (AOO 4.0.0)

Hi, On 01.10.2013 11:20, Yuri Myasoedov wrote: Hi! I've found some annoying issues while building AOO (4.0.0) on Win7 (32-bit). 1. Some modules are built with wrong permissions. I have to fix it manually with chmod. Some directories doesn't have x bit for execution, some files don't have any p

Re: [RELEASE 4.0.1][Product Update Notification Service] updated XML feeds for the former versions to be notified about version 4.0.1

Hi, update notification of AOO 4.0.1 for OOo 3.2, OOo 3.2.1, OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.1 and AOO 4.0.0 instances is active. Please report, if you observe any misfunction - Thanks in advance. Best regards, Oliver. On 20.09.2013 14:03, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, forgive me for writing in En

Re: AOO 4 unusable under Linux64?

Hi, On 30.09.2013 17:17, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 29.09.2013 07:30, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi all, Edwin Sharp and some other users found several bugs [1] under Linux64, in summary the conclusion seems to be that AOO currently is more or less unusable with Linux 64. Can some dev

Re: [RELEASE 4.0.1][Product Update Notification Service] updated XML feeds for the former versions to be notified about version 4.0.1

Hello list, Before with v.4.0.0, we have a page dedicated to MD5 checksums. h**p://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/4.0.0_checksums.html Is it possible to set up another one for 4.0.1? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

Hello, About permission for translating and editing cwiki on Serbia, I am interesting for that too. Regards, Stevanovic Vladislav - Wlada

Re: [RELEASE 4.0.1][Product Update Notification Service] updated XML feeds for the former versions to be notified about version 4.0.1

Hi, the next last status update ;-) I could notice that native language landing page for Portuguese (European) - namely http://www.openoffice.org/pt/ - is also available. Thus, I will integrate it. Best regards, Oliver. On 02.10.2013 14:06, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, last status upd

Re: Some annoying building issues on Win7 (AOO 4.0.0)

01.10.2013, 13:20, "Yuri Myasoedov" : > 1. Some modules are built with wrong permissions. I have to fix it manually > with chmod. Some directories doesn't have x bit for execution, some files > don't have any permission bits (i.e. 000). > 2. Many modules have source code that should include *comp

Re: [RELEASE 4.0.1][Product Update Notification Service] updated XML feeds for the former versions to be notified about version 4.0.1

Hi, last status update before going live in about 2-3 hours. Native language landing pages for update notification according to the given feedback will be: - Czech - Dutch - French - German - Italian - Japanese - Spanish - Slovak As I got not feedback for: - Chinese (simplified) - Chinese (tr

Re: Skills, Resources and Mentors

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> This projects depends on volunteer efforts. We have many routine >> tasks that need to be performed during a release cycle and even during >> ordinarily operation of our website and other p

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > ASF infra had to clean up the CWiki due to a lot of spam. Thus, ASF infra > put in place new default access rights. > In short: the right to edit CWiki pages needs to be granted > person-by-person. > OK. That explains it the

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

Andrea Pescetti wrote: Who needs whitelisting too? Your CWiki username please (and 24 hours of patience!). I've enabled the following people who edited the English Release Notes page and people who asked for access: ChriStef ~christef (this is Christos Stefanidis) Keith N. McKenna ~keith.mcke

latest opdate

Dear Ladies, Sirs ! Hopefully I can contribute to your work by reporting a few bugs in the latest (4.0.0) version Of Apache Open Office. 1. a document made in an earlier version had it's table of content completely messed up. It seemed to have switched to a different font (was Verdana);

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

On 02.10.2013 09:30, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: We have already everything to whitelist CWiki users for our CWiki space ooousers and ooodev. Members of ooo-admins group are able to whitelist. Unfortunately, yes. So I whitelisted orw and rgb-es. Who needs whitelisting

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

On 02.10.2013 09:30, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: We have already everything to whitelist CWiki users for our CWiki space ooousers and ooodev. Members of ooo-admins group are able to whitelist. Unfortunately, yes. So I whitelisted orw and rgb-es. Who needs whitelisting

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: We have already everything to whitelist CWiki users for our CWiki space ooousers and ooodev. Members of ooo-admins group are able to whitelist. Unfortunately, yes. So I whitelisted orw and rgb-es. Who needs whitelisting too? Your CWiki username please (and 24 hour

Re: [CWiki] new default access rights active

Hi, On 02.10.2013 08:19, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, ASF infra had to clean up the CWiki due to a lot of spam. Thus, ASF infra put in place new default access rights. In short: the right to edit CWiki pages needs to be granted person-by-person. I just talked to ASF infra on their IRC c