Re: Java 32

On 10/12/14 08:22, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 + > Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> >> >> On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: > Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

On 8 December 2014 at 23:27, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > > > On 07 Dec2014, at 17:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > > Reminder: one week left for submitting talks proposal for FOSDEM. > Deadline is Sunday 14 December. All details below and at > https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/call_for_talks_op

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

jan i wrote: Any news about the "open editors room", will it be saturday or sunday ? It's on Saturday, as specified in https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/call_for_talks_open_document Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

> On 10 Dec2014, at 08:07, jan i wrote: > > On 8 December 2014 at 23:27, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> >>> On 07 Dec2014, at 17:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> >>> Reminder: one week left for submitting talks proposal for FOSDEM. >> Deadline is Sunday 14 December. All details below and at >

Re: [DEV, WEBDAV] About issue i125194 and file lock under Webdav

Hi Dennis, On 12/04/2014 05:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: It would be good to reconcile whatever that AOO code is attempting to do and the WebDAV locking model, specified now in RFC4918, . (There is a locking-related Errata item as well.) RFC4918 is t

RE: Java 32

"JRE is Defective" is an awful and unhelpful message in any language. There is no programmatic basis for claiming that as a fact, and the software certainly does not have a way of determining it. The requested remedy is pretty opaque to ordinary users too. I suggest that this be modified someh

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: There are other issues, too, like licensing, metrics, and general community governance. Note that FOSDEM talks have a requirement to be technical. We had to reject a interesting submission about community metrics in the past since FOSDEM is not the place for it. I

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > We had to reject a interesting submission about community metrics in the > past since FOSDEM is not the place for it. > Conveniently, Biturgia is running an EU edition of its FLOSS Metrics event adjacent to FOSDEM: http://flosscommunitym

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

> On 10 Dec2014, at 15:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> There are other issues, too, like licensing, metrics, and general community >> governance. > > Note that FOSDEM talks have a requirement to be technical. We had to reject a > interesting submission about commun

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

> On 10 Dec2014, at 15:05, Simon Phipps wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > >> We had to reject a interesting submission about community metrics in the >> past since FOSDEM is not the place for it. >> > > Conveniently, Biturgia is running an EU edition o

Re: CentOS build box.

On 12/09/2014 08:31 AM, jan i wrote: > Hi > > FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO) > took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by the > infra Contractors. > > Time to find somebody, that will install the AOO specific buildbot parts. >

Re: Java 32

On 12/10/2014 08:52 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > "JRE is Defective" is an awful and unhelpful message in any > language. > > There is no programmatic basis for claiming that as a fact, and the > software certainly does not have a way of determining it. The > requested remedy is pretty opaque

Re: Java 32

Am 12/10/2014 08:22 AM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 + Rory O'Farrell wrote: On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus wrote: Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: If we are working to

Re: Java 32

Am 12/10/2014 11:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 12/10/2014 08:52 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: "JRE is Defective" is an awful and unhelpful message in any language. There is no programmatic basis for claiming that as a fact, and the software certainly does not have a way of determining it. The

Re: CentOS build box.

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote: > On 12/09/2014 08:31 AM, jan i wrote: > > Hi > > > > FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO) > > took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by > the > > infra Contractors. > > > > Time to

Reporting broken download link

Apache OpenOffice Downloads - Analyze errors of stable release English: Apache OpenOffice None of the drop downs are working. IE8.0 Windows7 The Free and Open Productivity Suite Help us Help the World * Product * Download * Support * Blog

[DEVTOOLS][EXT] Update to Netbeans plugin

Hi All, I ran into an issue when trying to create an UNO client application with the Netbeans plugin. External library jars were not added to dist/lib or the jar manifest during build. This problem appeared to be related to this issue [1]. I have added the following to UNOClientAppProject

Re: Reporting broken download link

​The dropdowns heavily relies on Javascript, if there is a plugin like NoScript preventing from running it. I suggest to go to the sourceforge site. http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Doug Beasley wrote: > English: Asturianu (ast) Čeština (cs)

RE: Java 32

Great, Marcus and Kay! Yes, "Java Runtime (JRE) is needed for some operations. See ." The page is a great start. 1. It needs to say "Versions Of Apache OpenOffice do not include a JRE." (The case for OpenOffice.org 3.4 doesn't matter.)

Re: Java 32

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:04:37 -0800 "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote: > Great, Marcus and Kay! > > Yes, "Java Runtime (JRE) is needed for some operations. See ." > > The page is a great > start. > > 1. It needs to say "Versions Of Apache OpenOf