Keith McKenna as CWiki admin

This one has been in queue for a long time, sorry Keith... As discussed on the doc list last month, new volunteers often ask for a MWiki account and a CWiki account at the same time. Keith already has privileges to create MWiki accounts, but not to create CWiki accounts. I propose that we give

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

Forgive my slipping a discussion on the vote thread with my +101. I have thought about things and I am going to cast the following vote: [X] delete the page. Why? It does not help the overall OpenOffice community to be making a strong argument over this issue at this point in time. it doe

RE: Updating the wiki theme.

+1 Nice idea and great attention to progressive staging. - Dennis -Original Message- From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 14:41 To: dev Subject: Updating the wiki theme. I would like to update the w

Re: New Contributor Looking for Help Locating Bugs

On 19/02/2015 Patrick Lynn wrote: My team and I are students at the College of Charleston are working on bug fixes for AOO. We have identified these three bugs as things that may be within our skill set: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=58604 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=549

Re: website security certificate

Hi - We had a reason that we enabled https in the first place. I don't recall it now, but there was a reason. It may have had to do with update servers. Regards, Dave On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: >>

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:28 PM, jan i wrote: > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > >> I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim >> maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page >> ad lib. I haven't checked on the n

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On 02/19/2015 11:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > The page in question is here: > > http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html > > Voting choices are: > > [ ] Leave the page as it is. > > [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the > tone does not fit or ASF rules were

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> Thread for discussion >> >> >> Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation >> earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:

Re: OOo4Kids & OOoLight Status

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/02/15 22:26, jan i wrote: > Do we (AOO) have to solve that, or is it the project (being downstream to > AOO) ? > To me it sounds like a downstream adaptation. If the point is to remove _existing_ functionality, then it is a downstream adaption

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use brok

Updating the wiki theme.

I would like to update the wiki theme to the one that we use on the homepage. ATM the wiki theme uses the very old OpenOffice.org, we are going 4-5 years in Apache and still have the same look and feel. I would like to get a new theme on the wiki for current style. First step should be to 'create'

Re: website security certificate

Andrea Pescetti wrote on 19/02/15 23:14: > On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: >> OK, next try. Still an error message? > > Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL > https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer > HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use brok

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, jan i wrote: > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > > On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: > > > >> OK, next try. Still an error message? > >> > > > > Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL > > https://www.openoffice.org ; as a

Re: website security certificate

On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: > >> OK, next try. Still an error message? >> > > Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL > https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer > HTTPS, we make it available,

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim > maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page > ad lib. I haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet. If > that stays,

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

OK, it seems your offer good lost as the topic got more intensive today. At least this applies to me. So, sorry from myside. When the forecast of the vote still remains then you can still do the rework of the webpage. At least this work should be not for nothing. Marcus Am 02/19/2015 10:38

Re: website security certificate

On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken extensions or paranoid security settings the

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Thread for discussion > > > Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation > earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this: > > http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje > Unfortu

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

Rob Weir wrote: Thread for discussion Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this: http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje [Andrea] The page provides relevant information in a bad way. It is by keeping

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 09:48 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Marcus wrote: I've changed all links for the grey box from HTTP to HTTPS. Let's see if this will help to solve the problem. The correct solution is to use src="/path/to/image", not forcing the prot

Re: Assigning an issue to myself

Alexandro Colorado wrote: you can simply comment on the bug, and provide patches. Once you do a few times your role will be bumped and more features would be enhanced. Actually it's enough to send a mail to the QA list http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html and ask for "QA Team" privil

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

Rob Weir wrote: > The page in question is here: > > http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html > > Voting choices are: > > [ ] Leave the page as it is. > > [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the > tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken. > > [ ] Delete t

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

[X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken. Marcus Am 02/19/2015 08:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: The page in question is here: http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html Voting choices are: [ ] Leave the page as it is

Re: [MWiki] Account creation

Olivier Bricaud wrote: > Hello all, > > I am a technical writer based in San Diego, CA and I'd be very > interested in participating in writing documentation for OpenOffice. I > am, however, unsure on how to get starter. Any pointers would be > appreciated. > > Could you please create a persona

Re: Assigning an issue to myself

Hi Erik, Erik Engstrom schrieb: Developers, I'd like to start working on fixing a bug from Bugzilla, but I don't know how to assign one to myself. The issue has a line Assigned To: The default entry is AOO issues mailing list (edit) (take) Click on "take" to assign the issue to you

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 09:09 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippswrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan iwrote: On Thursday, Februar

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Marcus wrote: > I've changed all links for the grey box from HTTP to HTTPS. Let's see if > this will help to solve the problem. The correct solution is to use src="/path/to/image", not forcing the protocol on the url. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La

RE: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page ad lib. I haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet. If that stays, it needs to ripple through the translations too. If I have to ca

Re: website security certificate

Marcus wrote: > Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> Marcus wrote: >>> Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote: >> >> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. H

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

PROPOSAL: Remove the page link from the sidebar, so that the controversial page is no longer reachable from other pages on the site. Do this in all languages having the page. We can then continue this discussion about the page itself, whether it is to be recast in some manner, whether the disc

[VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

Thread for discussion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki

I think you are not seeing anything about Unicode because ODF is fully Unicode and so is Apache OpenOffice and it is taken for granted. It came with being based on XML. I think you are asking something not about use of Unicode but perhaps having fonts the support the characters you are interes

[Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

The page in question is here: http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html Voting choices are: [ ] Leave the page as it is. [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken. [ ] Delete the entire page. The vote will last for

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > The page in question is here: > > http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html > > Voting choices are: > > [ ] Leave the page as it is. > > [X ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the > tone does not fit or ASF rules

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

Am 02/19/2015 08:38 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Marcus wrote: I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry. As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too aggressive

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Marcus wrote: > I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use as > every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry. > > > > As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too > aggressive or just the disclaimer is too unc

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

Am 02/19/2015 08:29 PM, schrieb jan i: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Marcus wrote: I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry. As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too aggressive or j

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:29 PM, jan i wrote: > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Marcus wrote: > >> I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use >> as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry. >> >> >> >> As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the conte

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Marcus wrote: > I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use > as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry. > > > > As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too > aggressive or just the disclaimer is too unc

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

I think we need to rewrite or remove the page. We can talk about the permissive AL. We can suggest that people do their own research and/or seek their own counsel. We could even offer a google link. If we have a vote then here is my +1 to make a change as we should not be offering this type of

Re: [MWiki] Account creation

Please read up the documentation module on our site http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-doc.html On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Olivier Bricaud wrote: > Hello all, > > I am a technical writer based in San Diego, CA and I'd be very interested > in participating in writing documentati

[MWiki] Account creation

Hello all,  I am a technical writer based in San Diego, CA and I'd be very interested in participating in writing documentation for OpenOffice. I am, however, unsure on how to get starter. Any pointers would be appreciated.  Could you please create a personal account for me (username: obricaud

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton< dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry. As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too aggressive or just the disclaimer is too unclear, I've moved the disclaimer to the top, made it red

Re: website security certificate

Marcus wrote: > Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: >> On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton< >>> dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > "The connectio

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, jan i wrote: > On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i wrote: >> > On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps >> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

1 Andrea -Original Message- From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) [mailto:r...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 06:15 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair On 18.02.2015 20:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 08/02/2015 Andrea

RE: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

+1 on change or removal It is perhaps more useful to follow the thread view of the conversation that resumed today on the legal-discuss mailing list, . Some suggestions have been voiced there too. Anyone can also f

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki

Am 02/19/2015 06:28 PM, schrieb Steve Henes: As hard as it is to find a place on the website showing the improvements in the newest version of Open Office, at least this should be easy: - go to the download webpage [1] - click on the link "Release Notes" inside the green box For older releases

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton< dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: "The connection to this web site is not fully secure

Re: New Contributor Looking for Help Locating Bugs

You can use our code browser that will let you identify code rather quickly. Please take a look here: http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/ Hope this helps, please provide more specific questions regarding the specific problem. On 2/19/15, Patrick Lynn wrote: > My team and I are students a

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, jan i wrote: > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > wrote: > > > jan i wrote: > > > On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i > > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki

This technica information is usually on our wiki, however what you are asking is a bit too specific. I think you should provide a sample document with large set of unicode to be able to test it. AOO uses the IBM developed ICU4C (International Component for Unicode), more information here: https://w

Re: website security certificate

On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > jan i wrote: > > On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i > > wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton < > >> dennis.hamil...@acm.org > > >>> wrote: >

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, jan i wrote: > On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i wrote: >> > On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps >> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015

New Contributor Looking for Help Locating Bugs

My team and I are students at the College of Charleston are working on bug fixes for AOO. We have identified these three bugs as things that may be within our skill set: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=58604 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=54923 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bu

Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki

As hard as it is to find a place on the website showing the improvements in the newest version of Open Office, It is even harder to find a place to let you know that it appears like an attempt to avoid making useful information easy to find I know this is the wrong place to send this to - plea

Re: website security certificate

jan i wrote: > On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton < >> dennis.hamil...@acm.org> >>> wrote: >>> "The connection to this web site is not fully secure

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i wrote: > > On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps > wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado > >> wrote: > >> > > >>

Re: Assigning an issue to myself

Ok. Thanks for your quick response On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > you can simply comment on the bug, and provide patches. Once you do a few > times your role will be bumped and more features would be enhanced. > > If you did this already then please reffer to the pa

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i wrote: > On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado >> wrote: >> > >> >> Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a mo

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado > wrote: > > > >> Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more > >> agreeable content on it. > > > > > > That sounds

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more >> agreeable content on it. > > > That sounds smart to me, +1. > > I note that on legal-discuss Jim [called the

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, jan i wrote: >> > On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i wrote: >> >> > Hi. >> >> > >

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > ​Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more > agreeable content on it. That sounds smart to me, +1. I note that on legal-discuss Jim [called the page][1] "misrepresentation" - maybe he has comments on what the

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, jan i wrote: > > On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i wrote: > >> > Hi. > >> > > >> > We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, jan i wrote: > On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i wrote: >> > Hi. >> > >> > We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which >> > seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people. >

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i wrote: > > Hi. > > > > We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which > > seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people. > > > > There are of course people who do not like the pa

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

I saw no confusion in the article and I enjoyed it But it is odd that the page exists there of it is an unrelated opinion piece. That said, of it is indicating a reason the license fire AOO is desirable, that is different. On Feb 19, 2015 10:10 AM, jan i wrote: > > Hi. > > We have a page h

Re: New Contributor Looking for Directory Information

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Patrick Lynn wrote: > Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of Charleston who > is working on bug fixes for AOO this semester with my team. We have > familiarized ourselves with the bug system but I was wondering if their is > any information on

Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i wrote: > Hi. > > We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which > seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people. > > There are of course people who do not like the page because they would like > another license to have the headl

Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause unfruitful discussions.

Hi. We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people. There are of course people who do not like the page because they would like another license to have the headline, they are not my concern (as long as the page we produce

Re: New Contributor Looking for Directory Information

Please review our Dev documentation on the AOO wiki. For your specific question take a look at this: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Source_code_directories On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Patrick Lynn wrote: > Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of Charleston who > is wo

Re: Assigning an issue to myself

you can simply comment on the bug, and provide patches. Once you do a few times your role will be bumped and more features would be enhanced. If you did this already then please reffer to the patch and a mantainer/tester might take a look at it. Regards. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Erik Eng

New Contributor Looking for Directory Information

Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of Charleston who is working on bug fixes for AOO this semester with my team. We have familiarized ourselves with the bug system but I was wondering if their is any information on the folder layout of AOO. As it stands whenever we find a bug

Assigning an issue to myself

Developers, I'd like to start working on fixing a bug from Bugzilla, but I don't know how to assign one to myself. I have fixed a bug and submitted a patch file as an attachment to that issue, but I haven't heard any response. I read something in the documentation about clicking a button to assign

Re: website security certificate

I tried it on 2 different computers and both got the error. Brenda From: jan i Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:26 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org ; dennis.hamil...@acm.org Cc: blissfulh...@live.com Subject: Re: website security certificate On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamil

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 18.02.2015 20:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 08/02/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> I will send a resolution for the next Board Meeting >> (18 February) for replacing me with Jan Iversen. > > The Board has just approved the resolution, so Jan Iversen is the new > OpenOffice PMC Chair (or, to >

Re: website security certificate

On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton < > dennis.hamil...@acm.org> > > wrote: > > > > >"The connection to this web site is not fully secure > > >because it conta

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote: > > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton < dennis.hamil...@acm.org> > wrote: > > >"The connection to this web site is not fully secure > >because it contains unencrypted elements (such as > >images)." Perhaps the

Re: Bugzilla on mailing list

>Remark those that follow bugzilla-admin, will have noticed that Infra has >identified a problem with BZ sending mail. >I assume it will be solved quickly. Fixed for me Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice