Am 31.10.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Marcus:
that is the case. Very likely you had an old version of a website file
in your browser cache with. When reloading the website all files get
updated.
So ist es. Danke!
Heiko
-
To unsub
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:14 PM, C&A Säger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please load the following screen shot:
> > http://www.mediafire.com/view/sqwigulqh8yfziu/JavaOptionsWin64.png
>
> The screenshot shows the Java options for a Win64 system with a 64-bit
> Java highlighted (C:\Program Files\...) while the
Damjan,
Thanks for the great summary of the situation, below. I have a few supporting
comments there.
> -Original Message-
> From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2015 09:22
> To: Apache OO
> Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Usability of Non-Optional Java
On 31/10/2015 PATHANGI JANARDHANAN JATINSHRAVAN wrote:
Attached is a patch that fixes a compilation error I faced while
building Open Office on Mac OS X 10.10.
Hi, thanks for starting your journey into the OpenOffice code!
Patches are not distributed when you post to the mailing list: our
mai
On 10/31/2015 03:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2015 10:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> see issue: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126612
>>> There's an update feed from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2 ready to go whenever
>>> we're ready for this.
>>
>> Thanks! I think
Unclear what you mean by your question. Did you download the danish version?
http://www.openoffice.org/da/download/index.html
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 29. okt. 2015 kl. 17.05 skrev joergenhon...@gmail.com:
>
> Dansk sprog i programmet hvordan
Just to note some things related to a Win64 port:
- In order to support win64 builds we would have to add a win64 bridge which we
currently don’t have. The process is similar to porting to a new architecture:
mail archives should have a message from Tor Lillquist who did the LibreOffice
port an
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Just to note some things related to a Win64 port:
>
> - In order to support win64 builds we would have to add a win64 bridge
> which we currently don’t have. The process is similar to porting to a new
> architecture: mail archives should have
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
>
> Damjan,
>
> Thanks for the great summary of the situation, below. I have a few
> supporting comments there.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2015 09:22