Re: Extension website: older URL give wrong CSS

Curious, seems to be fixed by unknow people. Sorry for the noise. - Mail original - De: "Dennis E. Hamilton" À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Dimanche 7 Février 2016 22:26:33 Objet: RE: Extension website: older URL give wrong CSS FR web forum, I see the

Re: Extension website: older URL give wrong CSS

Hi all, I'm not working for SourceForge anymore, as such I might not be able to address that myself, but I'll give it a try and let you know. Roberto 2016-02-08 10:14 GMT+01:00 FR web forum : > Hmm, I come back to this problem. > Some pictures seems to be missed with the

Re: netbeans-integration Japanese language update

On 02/04/2016 01:23 PM, Yu Tang wrote: Hi All, I just created the issue #126823 for netbeans-integration Japanese language update. https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126823 I don't have committer karma, so please commit the patch. Use my name and email in the commit message if it's

RE: [PROPOSAL][DEVTOOLS] Stage Java BootstrapConnector to Maven Repository

> -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 03:56 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][DEVTOOLS] Stage Java BootstrapConnector to Maven > Repository > > On 02/04/2016 03:48 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: [ ...

RE: [DISCUSS][POLICY?] Lost Features When Saving to ODF

Patricia, I share your disdain for rubber-stamp feature-loss warnings. It arouses FUD and does not help users, especially concerning their expectations for support of Microsoft formats. This is apparently a tit-for-tat activity between Microsoft Office and the OpenOffice.org family. The

RE: [PROPOSAL][DEVTOOLS] Stage Java BootstrapConnector to Maven Repository

I forgot to be explicit. By releasing, I mean in accordance with and . This can't be done single-handed, although all the preparation of release candidates could be (in simple cases). It's really up to Carl to

Clang static analyzer sweep

Hi; For those of you that enjoy , or are learning about, coding and thought you might have been on the wrong list : I recently ran Clang's static analyzer on Apache OpenOffice, which detected 2633 possible bugs: http://people.apache.org/~pfg/aoo-scan/ Enjoy! Pedro.

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

Original Message From: Kay Schenk Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:17:32 -0800 > also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal > March 1. Kay, any chance of of a link this info? Dave - To

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

On 02/08/2016 12:17 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi; > > For those of you that enjoy , or are learning about, coding and thought > you might have been on the wrong list : > > I recently ran Clang's static analyzer on Apache OpenOffice, which > detected 2633 possible bugs: > >

Re: [PROPOSAL][DEVTOOLS] Stage Java BootstrapConnector to Maven Repository

On 02/08/2016 03:03 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: I forgot to be explicit. By releasing, I mean in accordance with and . This can't be done single-handed, although all the preparation of release candidates could be

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

Dave wrote: Original Message From: Kay Schenk also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal March 1. Kay, any chance of of a link this info? This is not completely correct. It was sent to the infrastructure list (I don't think there is an archive I can

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

Hi Kay; Glad you liked it. Since you are asking, I ran the static analyzer using FreeBSD's clang devel port (with some minor adjustment). It was very easy to set up but it makes the regular build take - almost twice - longer. Of course there is no guarantee that bugs are real. I am aware

Re: [DISCUSS][POLICY?] Lost Features When Saving to ODF

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Patricia, > > I share your disdain for rubber-stamp feature-loss warnings. It > arouses FUD and does not help users, especially concerning their > expectations for support of Microsoft formats. > Dennis; Let us remember that those warnings have been in OpenOffice