Re: Googletest download failures

On 26 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote: > All our buildbots are currently failing trying to download > http://googletest.googlecode.com/files/gtest-1.7.0.zip > > Does anyone know if this is now the correct download location? > https://github.com/google/googletest/archive/master.zip > > I didn't have any

Googletest download failures

All our buildbots are currently failing trying to download http://googletest.googlecode.com/files/gtest-1.7.0.zip Does anyone know if this is now the correct download location? https://github.com/google/googletest/archive/master.zip I didn't have any problems about a week ago so I'm wondering if

Re: svn commit: r1757861 - /openoffice/trunk/main/configure.ac

On 08/26/2016 04:18 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > OK. I will investigate why this happened. Thanks. > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Don Lewis > wrote: > > ... and hamcrest wasn't removed from set_soenv.in : > >

Re: svn commit: r1757861 - /openoffice/trunk/main/configure.ac

OK. I will investigate why this happened. Thanks. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > ... and hamcrest wasn't removed from set_soenv.in: > > [snip] > configure: writing config.status > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating set_soenv >

Re: svn commit: r1757861 - /openoffice/trunk/main/configure.ac

... and hamcrest wasn't removed from set_soenv.in: [snip] configure: writing config.status configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating set_soenv config.status: creating Makefile Possible unintended interpolation of @HAMCREST_CORE_JAR in string at ./set_soenv line 1653. Global

Re: svn commit: r1757861 - /openoffice/trunk/main/configure.ac

On 26 Aug, ksch...@apache.org wrote: > Author: kschenk > Date: Fri Aug 26 14:49:44 2016 > New Revision: 1757861 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1757861=rev > Log: > Put configure.ac back to r1755455 before junit, hamcrest vesion checks. > Newere versions have not been reverted. > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

Don Lewis wrote: I forgot to mention that the PDF Import extension is somewhat problematic to distribute. It relies on poppler, which has a GPLv2 license. Yes, this was the reason for removing the extension from the OpenOffice installers back at the time. We do bundle GPL dictionaries

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

Don Lewis wrote: On 25 Aug, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Is there a real reason for it? ... otherwise we can simply drop the requirement saying "we won't explicitly test compatibility with Java < 1.7"; but in that case we must provide ways to obtain a compatible JRE for all the 4 supported platforms.

Re: Attention: Courtney

Don't worry about all the e-mails. It's a bit like walking into the middle of a conversation. I would prefer to establish direct communication, not through the list, so that we can work out the best way for you to help at this point in time. You should get two copies of this e-mail, one

Re: Attention: Courtney

I use @roadrunner.com its a time warner cable I believe. I wouldn't mind the emails so much if I was involved but I'm not contributing and not sure how to begin to. JZA wrote: > Is a mailing list, is the way it works, usually you can apply filters and > thread views

Re: Attention: Courtney

Hey Patricia! I'm sorry it took so long to reply. Your email got lost in the river of emails this subscription sends me everyday! I hate to say it but I think all of this is too advanced for me. I want to help but. I just still got lost trying to understand the emails everyone was sending.

RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

[BCC to PMC, FYI to L10N and QA.] The 4.2.1-patch1 release repository is now populated with the only localizations that we have: English (en-US) and German (de) for all platforms plus the additional Nederland (nl) for Windows. The localizations took until yesterday, 2016-08-25, to be

RE: Line Spacing Comparison and Issues with Docx

Sorry for the double email. Also, I can provide more detailed data, but its big and not emailable. From: Nate Bellowe [mailto:nath...@windward.net] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:06 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: David Thielen Subject: Line Spacing Comparison and

Re: Fwd: Re: Questions about buildbot internals

On 08/26/2016 04:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> Do you really mean 16.04 LTS? Is there a buildbot setup with this? I >> am NOT >> a Ubuntu person. > > Yes, I did mean 16.04 LTS. But I see that end of life for 14.04 > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases is April 2019, so 5

Re: Forums not working?

JZA wrote: Well the issue is actually on the forums.openoffice.org doing a google search to the direct site worked: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/ but typing the url will forward it to the project pages, like this: forums.openoffice.org -> http://www.openoffice.org/projects/forums/ So I

Re: Fwd: Re: Questions about buildbot internals

Kay Schenk wrote: Do you really mean 16.04 LTS? Is there a buildbot setup with this? I am NOT a Ubuntu person. Yes, I did mean 16.04 LTS. But I see that end of life for 14.04 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases is April 2019, so 5 years and not 3 as it was for earlier Ubuntu LTS versions. This

Re: Forums not working?

On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:21:56 -0500 JZA wrote: > Well the issue is actually on the forums.openoffice.org doing a google > search to the direct site worked: > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/ > but typing the url will forward it to the project pages, like this: >

Re: Forums not working?

Well the issue is actually on the forums.openoffice.org doing a google search to the direct site worked: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/ but typing the url will forward it to the project pages, like this: forums.openoffice.org -> http://www.openoffice.org/projects/forums/ So I guess is

Re: Forums not working?

JZA wrote: Wonder if there is something wrong wtih the forums? Everything works correctly for me at https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewforum.php?f=7 and no outage notifications were sent. I also see a recent message posted by you, so I assume this is fixed. Regards, Andrea.