Am 01.09.2016 um 00:59 schrieb Simon Phipps:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30
>>> To:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Independent Entity to Develop and
> -Original Message-
> From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO
>
> On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > One can always create an
On 08/31/2016 09:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> One can always create an independent entity. It hasn't happened. By now,
> the odds are clearly that it will not. I suspect that folks who would pursue
> that avenue do not see a meaningful opportunity.
>
> My considered opinion is that
On 8/31/2016 10:25 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message- From: Patricia Shanahan
[mailto:p...@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:57 To:
dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Putting Windows First ( was
RE: null)
[ ... ] [orcmid]
I would like to suggest a way of
Hi Patricia;
I, for one, appreciate the idea: 80% of the users are Windows people and
the project should be focusing on improving the experience on that platform.
OTOH, most of the active developers work on UNIX variant (and I suspect
FreeBSD is the majority lately). I conceptually
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:38 PM, toki wrote:
> On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > The question I am left with is this: If a cousin development provides
> what you want, why are you not satisfied with that?
>
> There are functions and capabilities in AOo
On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> The question I am left with is this: If a cousin development provides what
> you want, why are you not satisfied with that?
There are functions and capabilities in AOo that are not in LibO or EO.
There are functions and capabilities in EO that
On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> One can always create an independent entity. It hasn't happened. By now,
> the odds are clearly that it will not.
The Document Foundation is an independent entity, building upon the OOo
3.x code base.
> My considered opinion is that the
On 8/31/2016 10:25 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:57
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Putting Windows First ( was RE: null)
[ ... ]
[orcmid]
I would like to suggest a way of
One can always create an independent entity. It hasn't happened. By now, the
odds are clearly that it will not. I suspect that folks who would pursue that
avenue do not see a meaningful opportunity.
My considered opinion is that the greatest barrier is lack of a meaningful
> -Original Message-
> From: Απόστολος Συρόπουλος [mailto:asyropoulos...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:36
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: ΑΠ: Merge with LibreOffice?
>
>
> >> Greetings, dear AOO community.
> >>
> >> Please note first that this message is
[BCC to AOO dev list]
Please remove dev@openoffice.apache.org from these messages. The discussion
seems to have little to do with Apache OpenOffice and there appears to be
nothing that the project can contribute with respect to this issue.
If that is not the case, please open a bugzilla
13 matches
Mail list logo