On 4 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel
Hmm I was not answering you. Should have picked Damian mal.
The suggestion to use .net is to translate to c#. Or I misread. Sorry.
Am 4. Oktober 2017 20:50:06 MESZ schrieb Marcus :
>Am 04.10.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Peter kovacs:
>
>are you answering my mail or was this just a
On 10/4/2017 4:43 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 10/4/2017 3:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42
On 4 Oct, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 10/4/2017 3:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 9/30/2017 8:42
Despite it's way too late, I wish to add my +1 (binding), since it works
nicely on my AirBook now!
2017-10-04 22:11 GMT+02:00 Roberto Galoppini :
>
>
> 2017-10-04 0:40 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
>
>> On 30/09/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> I
2017-10-04 0:40 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
> On 30/09/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I am calling a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4
>> as GA!!
>>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I did several tests, including:
> - downloading and verifying the .bz2 sources (checksums,
On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> That might explain
Am 04.10.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Peter kovacs:
are you answering my mail or was this just a random reply?
I'm wondering as I don't see anything new in your mail.
How relevant is Win 32 bit in future?
0,0 %
Shouldn't we offer a Win 64bit in long run?
Of course.
Why move to C#? I do not
+1
I just want to say, this makes me very happy. I regret that I haven't
had enough free time to make any real contribution myself, but massive
props to everybody who made this happen! AOO lives on! :-)
I still have some ideas for Calc I want to work on, so maybe I'll
finally be able to carve
On 10/4/2017 12:47 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> That
Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> That might explain why I have never seen a working
On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
That might explain why I have never seen a working WikiPublisher in the
last releases.
(Since at least
After waiting giving us a bit more than the required and
normal 72 hours, we have plenty more than the required 3
+1 (binding) votes.
As such, I call the Vote CLOSED with the RESULT that the
Vote Passes!! 4.1.4-RC4 will be released as GA !
Thanks to all who helped in every and all ways in
Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> That might explain why I have never seen a working WikiPublisher in the
>>> last releases.
>>> (Since at least 4.1.2 we build with that option on Windows)
>>>
>>> The
On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> That might explain why I have never seen a working WikiPublisher in the
>> last releases.
>> (Since at least 4.1.2 we build with that option on Windows)
>>
>> The question is: Do we need to build with that option if no
On 10/4/2017 3:03 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
...
I've just tried this on another Mac, with the very same operating system,
and it works.
I need to wait until later today to retry on the other machine, let's say
in 6 hours from now.
...
Given this, and the other reports of it working on Macs,
Works for me. FWIW, I tested on 3 other Macs, none of which were the
build server.
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Roberto Galoppini
> wrote:
>
> I've re-downloaded again, it does not work. Does anyone else have tried
> that? I'm really the only one facing problem
Il 04 Ott 2017 00:49, "Andrea Pescetti" ha scritto:
On 03/10/2017 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2017-10-03 19:47 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher:
>
>> What do you have in /Users//Library/Application
>> Support/OpenOffice/4/user?
>>
> Nothing, I've simulated a fresh new start.
>
I see
How relevant is Win 32 bit in future?
Shouldn't we offer a Win 64bit in long run?
Why move to C#? I do not see the benefit.
I would rather opt for a clean modern C++ library design with hourglass APIs.
With that we can support all languages people want to use in an extention.
And we reduce
19 matches
Mail list logo