On 04/11/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
I compared the list of languages supported with full installers in OOo
3.3.0 with what we have in AOO 4.0.1. The following languages are
missing in AOO 4.0.1
Not bad. At the time we were releasing languages that were 80% complete
while we now require 100% complet
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> And here is a draft of the landing page we'd send users to who have an
>> older version of OOo if there is not an AOO version in their language:
>> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol-nl.ht
Am 11/02/2013 06:11 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Nov 1, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 11/01/2013 08:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus (OOo) ha scritto:
Up to today I don't know of a single case were this led to a
misunderstanding.
Yes, but up to now we haven't sent it to som
On Nov 1, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 11/01/2013 08:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> Marcus (OOo) ha scritto:
>>> Up to today I don't know of a single case were this led to a
>>> misunderstanding.
>>
>> Yes, but up to now we haven't sent it to some dozen millions non-English
>>
Am 11/01/2013 08:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus (OOo) ha scritto:
Up to today I don't know of a single case were this led to a
misunderstanding.
Yes, but up to now we haven't sent it to some dozen millions non-English
speaking users through update notices... Note that this is not the p
Hi,
On 01.11.2013 08:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus (OOo) ha scritto:
Up to today I don't know of a single case were this led to a
misunderstanding.
Yes, but up to now we haven't sent it to some dozen millions non-English
speaking users through update notices... Note that this is not the p
Marcus (OOo) ha scritto:
Up to today I don't know of a single case were this led to a
misunderstanding.
Yes, but up to now we haven't sent it to some dozen millions non-English
speaking users through update notices... Note that this is not the page
describing the End-of-life; it is the landin
Am 10/31/2013 11:35 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 29/10/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
And here is a draft of the landing page we'd send users to who have an
older version of OOo if there is not an AOO version in their language:
http://www.openoffice.o
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> And here is a draft of the landing page we'd send users to who have an
>> older version of OOo if there is not an AOO version in their language:
>> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol-nl.ht
On 29/10/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
And here is a draft of the landing page we'd send users to who have an
older version of OOo if there is not an AOO version in their language:
http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol-nl.html
This will be very useful to attract volunteers. A few questions/
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > I'd like to move forward now with this proposal from July.
> >
> > I've updated the EOL page here to say that OOo 3.3.0 and earlier are
> > no longer supported. That page also explains what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Rob Weir
> wrote:
>> I'd like to move forward now with this proposal from July.
>>
>> I've updated the EOL page here to say that OOo 3.3.0 and earlier
>> are no longer supported. That page also exp
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I'd like to move forward now with this proposal from July.
>
> I've updated the EOL page here to say that OOo 3.3.0 and earlier are
> no longer supported. That page also explains what this means.
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/development/release
I'd like to move forward now with this proposal from July.
I've updated the EOL page here to say that OOo 3.3.0 and earlier are
no longer supported. That page also explains what this means.
http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol.html
I'll start to do the other 3 items now. I'll coo
2013/7/19 Rob Weir
> We currently have this link from the download page,from 2009,
> announcing end-of-life for OpenOffice.org 2.x:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol.html
>
> I'd like to update that page to also state that 3.x version prior to
> 3.4.x are also end-of-life. W
Am 07/19/2013 02:20 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
We currently have this link from the download page,from 2009,
announcing end-of-life for OpenOffice.org 2.x:
http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol.html
I'd like to update that page to also state that 3.x version prior to
3.4.x are also end-
On 7/19/13 2:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> We currently have this link from the download page,from 2009,
> announcing end-of-life for OpenOffice.org 2.x:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol.html
>
> I'd like to update that page to also state that 3.x version prior to
> 3.4.x are als
+1
rgds
jan i
On Jul 19, 2013 2:53 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
> +1
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 5:20 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > We currently have this link from the download page,from 2009,
> > announcing end-of-life for OpenOffice.org 2.x:
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol.html
+1
On Jul 19, 2013, at 5:20 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> We currently have this link from the download page,from 2009,
> announcing end-of-life for OpenOffice.org 2.x:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol.html
>
> I'd like to update that page to also state that 3.x version prior to
>
We currently have this link from the download page,from 2009,
announcing end-of-life for OpenOffice.org 2.x:
http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/eol.html
I'd like to update that page to also state that 3.x version prior to
3.4.x are also end-of-life. Why? We're unlikely to issue any
20 matches
Mail list logo
