+1
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
On 12/12/2012 01:48 AM, janI wrote:
-1, sorry but this thread is spiraling out to a theoretical discussion, so
I allow myself to focus it back:
My original proposal was (in shortform, see mail 1): "propopal: keep the
create user as it is today, in the new version".
I have received no -1, one
On 12/12/12 10:48 AM, janI wrote:
> -1, sorry but this thread is spiraling out to a theoretical discussion, so
> I allow myself to focus it back:
I don't agree here but I am fine with the way how you plan to move forward.
So please continue the upgrade first, keep user registration manual for
now
-1, sorry but this thread is spiraling out to a theoretical discussion, so
I allow myself to focus it back:
My original proposal was (in shortform, see mail 1): "propopal: keep the
create user as it is today, in the new version".
I have received no -1, one +1 and 2 concerns:
one (from imacat, ma
On 12/10/2012 09:39 AM, janI wrote:
On 10 December 2012 17:51, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 12/10/12 5:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI wrote:
we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users
are
very low and since the "normal" spam measure
I've verified for the new account: Testaccount. The manual
registration a new wiki user works fine:
* Email with a random password has been sent. I received it normal.
* When I first login as Testaccount with this password, Wiki offers me
change the password and shows me the form for it.
* The pass
Some users think they need an account just to read, but that might not be
the case with these users.
Helen: you have the procedure in your head, could you not simulate a new
user, and verify it works ?
I have no problem with the old automated procedure, as long as sysop
understand the risk of a n
Hello Jan, all.
10.12.2012 22:33, janI пишет:
The most efficient measure is a manual creation, and if I count correctly
we talk about less than 10 new users in a month.
I think the manual registration for new wiki users is not good.
We have created 12 new user accounts since 24 November. The
On 10 December 2012 17:51, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/10/12 5:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI wrote:
> >> we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users
> are
> >> very low and since the "normal" spam measures have received a -1, I
> p
It was:
- 4 days cooling off period (simple config switch)
This is quite normal, time can be adjusted, but to combat spam, it should
be at least 3 days.
- sysop approval of new accounts, before they can edit (this is NO mail,
but "inside" mwiki)
I am against this one myself, because it requires s
On 12/10/12 5:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI wrote:
>> we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users are
>> very low and since the "normal" spam measures have received a -1, I propose
>> the following for the new Wiki.
>>
>
> What was the
On 12/10/12 5:33 PM, janI wrote:
> to me it is a long term solution
+1 when taking into account that we have 10 or less requests per month
Juergen
>
> alternatives are:
>
> 1) open up, and get spam
> 2) use some of the spam measures, like e.g. cool off period = 4 days.
>
> The most effici
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI wrote:
> we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users are
> very low and since the "normal" spam measures have received a -1, I propose
> the following for the new Wiki.
>
What was the "normal" measure that got a -1?
Are there no C
to me it is a long term solution
alternatives are:
1) open up, and get spam
2) use some of the spam measures, like e.g. cool off period = 4 days.
The most efficient measure is a manual creation, and if I count correctly
we talk about less than 10 new users in a month.
Please feel free to su
On 2012/12/10 22:52, janI said:
> we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users are
> very low and since the "normal" spam measures have received a -1, I propose
> the following for the new Wiki.
>
> The "new user" page is changed, to send an e-mail to
> dev@openoffice.ap
we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users are
very low and since the "normal" spam measures have received a -1, I propose
the following for the new Wiki.
The "new user" page is changed, to send an e-mail to
dev@openoffice.apache.org (as done manual today), and one of
16 matches
Mail list logo
