Hi,
I would like to fix this bug.
Can someone assign it to me?
I think I should modify this in the module SC, correct?
Thanks,
Regards,
Maarten
Maarten Kesselaers wrote:
I would like to fix this bug.
Can someone assign it to me?
With pleasure! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121722 is
all yours now.
I think I should modify this in the module SC, correct?
Regina wrote in the issue that this is implemented
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Maarten Kesselaers wrote:
Hi,
I would like to fix this bug.
Can someone assign it to me?
I think I should modify this in the module SC, correct?
OpenGrok is your friend:
http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/search?q=IMCSCHproject=aoo-trunk
This is using the patch that I had created last week which gets us
past the hsqldb java7 compile errors:
Entering /mnt/lfs/sources/ubuntu/local_dev300/vcl/prj
cd .. make -s -r -j1
make: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcache.h', needed by
Cheers,
Pedro.
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com
A: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc:
Inviato: Venerdì 15 Febbraio 2013 13:49
Oggetto: oracle java7 build bug
T his is using the patch that I had created last week which gets us
past the hsqldb java7 compile errors
Hi at all
Long time ago, at the old OpenOffice.org project we have had a 24 hour
Bughunting meeting. And it was bloody fun.
Well, it's not the best situation if it's not annonced befor, but I
simply would like to give it a try. So jump into our qa irc channel:
Network: freenode.net
On 2/8/13 5:15 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi at all
Long time ago, at the old OpenOffice.org project we have had a 24 hour
Bughunting meeting. And it was bloody fun.
Well, it's not the best situation if it's not annonced befor, but I
simply would like to give it a try. So jump into our qa
I too like the ideabut lets plan it a bit more in advance, and announce
it via mailing list and blog.
GOOD INITATIVE !
rgds
Jan I.
On 8 February 2013 17:15, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi at all
Long time ago, at the old OpenOffice.org project we have had a 24 hour
Am 08.02.13 17:22, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 2/8/13 5:15 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi at all
Long time ago, at the old OpenOffice.org project we have had a 24 hour
Bughunting meeting. And it was bloody fun.
Well, it's not the best situation if it's not annonced befor, but I
simply would
It is related to currency formatting:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121573
Thanks!
-Rob
it.
It looks good to me.
additional issue:
It also include the fix to some other bug, the link to which i could not
find
because it has been removed from the bug-list now.
But the original repository doesnt reflect the change needed to fix it.
In the patch file lines 66-67 handles
Febbraio 2013 15:22
Oggetto: AOO build + bug fix
Hi dev community,
I've built my own AOO and now I'm working on the foolowing bug
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102212
In fact I've corrected it(which was a 2 minute work),
but I haven't worked with any version control before so
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 03:22:40PM -0500, Hrishit Patel wrote:
Hi dev community,
I've built my own AOO and now I'm working on the foolowing bug
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102212
In fact I've corrected it(which was a 2 minute work),
but I haven't worked with any
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
It's not enough to remove LO, at least in all previous fedora versions,
you have to blacklist lo in /etc/yum.conf with a line
exclude=libreoffice*
Sorry for nitpicking. But should this be automated as part of
Hi *,
If anyone knows if it's possible to use the formula name as defined in
ODF instead of the localized one, please comment on the bug.
If there is no solution, this bug deserves a pt-BR release with a fix.
Regards
- Forwarded message from bugzi...@apache.org -
Date: Thu, 24 Jan
, on the development mailing list, and let you
know.
I fix bug in the translation. Check.
Albino
. I'm not sure if this is possible, I
will
try to find someone in the know, on the development mailing list, and let
you
know.
I fix bug in the translation. Check.
Please see comment 5
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121664#c5
A native speaker should check that all
Hi
2013/1/24 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
Please see comment 5
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121664#c5
I read.
A native speaker should check that all formula names keep the same
translation as before; so far these two strings have been discovered by
the user,
2013/1/24 Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
It's not enough to remove LO, at least in all previous fedora versions,
you have to blacklist lo in /etc/yum.conf with a line
exclude=libreoffice*
Sorry for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/23/13 1:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:38:39PM -0200, Albino Biasutti Neto
wrote:
Hi
2013/1/22 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
I don't have a fedora18 to test right now, but installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/23/13 9:04 AM, Jrgen Schmidt wrote:
On 1/23/13 1:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:38:39PM -0200, Albino Biasutti Neto
wrote:
Hi
2013/1/22 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
I don't have a fedora18
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:49:15PM -0200, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote:
I am using Fedora 18 and AOO 3.4.1
Realizing that the AOO is crashing to do several things: word of
correction, close the page, open the AOO own.
That's just me or a bug to be fixed?
I don't have a fedora18 to test
On 01/22/2013 03:38 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote:
Hi
2013/1/22 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
I don't have a fedora18 to test right now, but installing OpenOffice in
fedora requires to blacklist LO. If you didn't so, then it might happen
that your installation is broken.
The
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:38:39PM -0200, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote:
Hi
2013/1/22 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
I don't have a fedora18 to test right now, but installing OpenOffice in
fedora requires to blacklist LO. If you didn't so, then it might happen
that your
Here is a message on the forum about the necessity to have a login to view the
list of the bug fixes:
http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=58749
Indeed, why is it mandatory to have an account to view the bug list?
This is not user-friendly.
Can the policy be changed?
Hagar
Oggetto: Bug list in release notes: why bugzilla account needed?
Here is a message on the forum about the necessity to have a login to
view the list of the bug fixes:
http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=58749
Indeed, why is it mandatory to have an account to view the bug list
Oggetto: Bug list in release notes: why bugzilla account needed?
Here is a message on the forum about the necessity to have a login to view the
list of the bug fixes:
http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=58749
Indeed, why is it mandatory to have an account to view the bug list
wget of an expensive query URL?
-Rob
cheers,
Pedro.
Da: janI j...@apache.org
A: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Inviato: Lunedì 14 Gennaio 2013 16:10
Oggetto: Re: Bug list in release notes: why bugzilla account needed
Le 14/01/2013 22:35, Dave Fisher a écrit :
OK.
On the wiki page change the bugzilla search to
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?namedcmd=Resolved341ReleaseBlocker
No login required.
This returns more than 500 hits.
Here is the link found by acknak on the forum:
On 01/14/2013 01:55 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le 14/01/2013 22:35, Dave Fisher a écrit :
OK.
On the wiki page change the bugzilla search to
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?namedcmd=Resolved341ReleaseBlocker
No login required.
This returns more than 500 hits.
Here is the link
we changed editor with the upgrade, so depending on when you did it last,
that could be the explanation.
rgds
Jan I.
On 7 January 2013 15:09, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Did anybody encounter same problem as I did? Copy following lines to a
wiki page, but when previewing the
My last report is ok[1] wrote at 12/23 but when I update new report today,
I found this problem. My question is how to make editor recognize the
Enter. If I press Enter in editor, it is OK, but if I copy text from
other editor(e.g. notepad), it become one line finally.
On 1/7/2013 11:18, janI wrote:
that sund like the CR/LF problem (unix/windows), the new editor might be
more sensitive.
I do not think there are anything I can tune on that part, but maybe TJ
knows more (I am not the best mwiki user, I just do the server maintenance).
Rgds
jan I.
The wiki
ok understand
thanks (y)
2012/12/21 Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org
Hi Galileo,
On 2012/12/20 9:44 PM, you wrote:
to execute command
soffice --headless --acept=socket,port=8100;urp;**
i get
fontconfig warning /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/**
fonts/truetype/fc_local.conf
line 13: having
PM, schrieb janI:
For general information, I have added a new bug 121536, regarding problems
with translations.
The content of the msg text in the source code is non translatable due to
ambiguity.
[xxx] means normally a variable will be inserted here
example: [Time] may NOT be translated
, the
communication with our l10n people what to translate and what not could
become really easy.
thanks for the idea.
:-)
Marcus
On 22 December 2012 12:31, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/21/2012 11:00 PM, schrieb janI:
For general information, I have added a new bug 121536
Hi Galileo,
On 2012/12/20 9:44 PM, you wrote:
to execute command
soffice --headless --acept=socket,port=8100;urp;
i get
fontconfig warning /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/fonts/truetype/fc_local.conf
line 13: having multiple family in alias ins't supported and may not
works as expected
This is
For general information, I have added a new bug 121536, regarding problems
with translations.
The content of the msg text in the source code is non translatable due to
ambiguity.
[xxx] means normally a variable will be inserted here
example: [Time] may NOT be translated but [l] (for load) should
to execute command
soffice --headless --acept=socket,port=8100;urp;
i get
fontconfig warning /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/fonts/truetype/fc_local.conf
line 13: having multiple family in alias ins't supported and may not
works as expected
the command run fine
--
*Galileo Teco Juarez*
*Web:*
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:34:24PM -0600, Lucas Burson wrote:
Do you know C++? Are you willing to dive into the source? I/we can give
a hand and point you where to look.
I do know C++ (and xslt, if it's anywhere) and I am willing to play
with source. The downside is that I've
Good to know. Did you already build OpenOffice? In which platform are
you developing?
Nope, I did not build it yet.
I did get the AOO4.0 M1 binary release and I've done a few manual
tests on TestLink; soon I'll checkout the svn automated tests to see
what that's like (looked really easy,
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:41:58AM -0600, Lucas Burson wrote:
Good to know. Did you already build OpenOffice? In which platform are
you developing?
Nope, I did not build it yet.
I did get the AOO4.0 M1 binary release and I've done a few manual
tests on TestLink; soon I'll
Yes, it is as a tag and there is a branch for 3.4*, but if you want to
start developing, the best it work directly with trunk (and use git-svn
instead of subversion, it is better for a project this size; I don't
recall if there is somewhere on the building guide a instruction to
check out
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:49:08PM -0600, Lucas Burson wrote:
Yes, it is as a tag and there is a branch for 3.4*, but if you want to
start developing, the best it work directly with trunk (and use git-svn
instead of subversion, it is better for a project this size; I don't
On 12/5/12 5:34 AM, Lucas Burson wrote:
Do you know C++? Are you willing to dive into the source? I/we can give
a hand and point you where to look.
I do know C++ (and xslt, if it's anywhere) and I am willing to play
with source. The downside is that I've never worked on a project of
this
additional edit
permissions in Bugzilla.
-Rob
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:52:32AM -0600, Lucas Burson wrote:
Hi,
I was doing some regression testing on Ubuntu and discovered a bug
which was already
On 12/4/12 8:52 AM, Lucas Burson wrote:
Hi,
I was doing some regression testing on Ubuntu and discovered a bug
which was already reported [1]. It's about 3 months old.
That got me wondering, is there some best practice (or something) to
update a previously found bug? In bugzilla, should I
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:52:32AM -0600, Lucas Burson wrote:
Hi,
I was doing some regression testing on Ubuntu and discovered a bug
which was already reported [1]. It's about 3 months old.
That got me wondering, is there some best practice (or something) to
update a previously
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:29:22PM -0600, Lucas Burson wrote:
Well, that got complicated. Thanks for finding that, Ariel. it'll help
me find out how this stuff is put together.
Do you know C++? Are you willing to dive into the source? I/we can give
a hand and point you where to look.
Do you know C++? Are you willing to dive into the source? I/we can give
a hand and point you where to look.
I do know C++ (and xslt, if it's anywhere) and I am willing to play
with source. The downside is that I've never worked on a project of
this size... so I started with picking up QA stuff.
Since downgrade still there, I'd suggest reject defect 121200.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I tested the regression defect *Bug
121200*https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121200on latest
build, performance downgrade still exist.
Pls
Hi
I tested the regression defect *Bug
121200*https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121200on latest
build, performance downgrade still exist.
Pls see http://people.apache.org/~liuzhe/testdashboard/#pvt_gui_Benchmark
But the status of bug121200 is fixed.
I suggest to re-analyze
I should have added that in Text Animation I checked Animate attached shape.
I have just tried it with a Wipe effect instead of Appear and the same
crash happened
Tony Hagon
Original Message
Subject:Bug in Impress: report
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:59:31 +
From
Hello
I wonder if you would please pass this bug report to whoever cares about
it
I use Impress 3.4.1 on XP SP3.
On a presentation today, I created a text box, font Jane Austen (a
script type font).
In custom animation I selected Appear, On click
Properties Text animation: As one object
Thanks for the bug report. I've added it to our Bugzilla issue tracker here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121410
If you create a BZ account you can watch this issue or enter
additional comments.
Regards,
-Rob
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Tony Hagon perso...@inter2000
at 12:55 AM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
Have you verify this bug? Has it been fixed already?
I do have Office 97. But what part needs to be verified? Is there a
document I need to load? Do you have the test document?
-Rob
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Rob Weir
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Damjan Jovanovic damjan@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:25 AM, lou ql louqin...@gmail.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
It's about the import/export of underling color, I have verified with MS
word 2003, but I don't
Hi,
On 22.11.2012 03:25, lou ql wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
It's about the import/export of underling color, I have verified with MS
word 2003, but I don't have MS word 97, could anybody help with this?
I looked for Microsoft Word 97 at my MSDN subscription.
Hi,
On 22.11.2012 14:55, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 22.11.2012 03:25, lou ql wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
It's about the import/export of underling color, I have verified
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
It's about the import/export of underling color, I have verified with MS
word 2003, but I don't have MS word 97, could anybody help with this?
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Lou QingLe
801 - 860 of 860 matches
Mail list logo
