On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>
>> Original Message
>> From: Kay Schenk
>>
>>> also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal
>>> March 1.
>>>
>> Kay, any chance of of a link this info?
>>
>
> This is not completely corre
Hi Kay;
Glad you liked it.
Since you are asking, I ran the static analyzer using FreeBSD's clang
devel port (with some minor adjustment). It was very easy to set
up but it makes the regular build take - almost twice - longer.
Of course there is no guarantee that bugs are real.
I am aware people
Dave wrote:
Original Message
From: Kay Schenk
also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal
March 1.
Kay, any chance of of a link this info?
This is not completely correct. It was sent to the infrastructure list
(I don't think there is an archive I can l
Original Message
From: Kay Schenk
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:17:32 -0800
> also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal
> March 1.
Kay, any chance of of a link this info?
Dave
-
To unsubsc
On 02/08/2016 12:17 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi;
>
> For those of you that enjoy , or are learning about, coding and thought
> you might have been on the wrong list :
>
> I recently ran Clang's static analyzer on Apache OpenOffice, which
> detected 2633 possible bugs:
>
> http://people.apach
Hi;
For those of you that enjoy , or are learning about, coding and thought
you might have been on the wrong list :
I recently ran Clang's static analyzer on Apache OpenOffice, which
detected 2633 possible bugs:
http://people.apache.org/~pfg/aoo-scan/
Enjoy!
Pedro.
--