Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

2016-02-09 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Dave wrote: > >> Original Message >> From: Kay Schenk >> >>> also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal >>> March 1. >>> >> Kay, any chance of of a link this info? >> > > This is not completely corre

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

2016-02-08 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Kay; Glad you liked it. Since you are asking, I ran the static analyzer using FreeBSD's clang devel port (with some minor adjustment). It was very easy to set up but it makes the regular build take - almost twice - longer. Of course there is no guarantee that bugs are real. I am aware people

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

2016-02-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Dave wrote: Original Message From: Kay Schenk also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal March 1. Kay, any chance of of a link this info? This is not completely correct. It was sent to the infrastructure list (I don't think there is an archive I can l

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

2016-02-08 Thread Dave
Original Message From: Kay Schenk Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:17:32 -0800 > also a ps. I think people.apache.org is still slated for removal > March 1. Kay, any chance of of a link this info? Dave - To unsubsc

Re: Clang static analyzer sweep

2016-02-08 Thread Kay Schenk
On 02/08/2016 12:17 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi; > > For those of you that enjoy , or are learning about, coding and thought > you might have been on the wrong list : > > I recently ran Clang's static analyzer on Apache OpenOffice, which > detected 2633 possible bugs: > > http://people.apach

Clang static analyzer sweep

2016-02-08 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; For those of you that enjoy , or are learning about, coding and thought you might have been on the wrong list : I recently ran Clang's static analyzer on Apache OpenOffice, which detected 2633 possible bugs: http://people.apache.org/~pfg/aoo-scan/ Enjoy! Pedro. --