On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.orgwrote:
As you can see in
http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/
On Apr 21, 2013 2:15 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
As you can see in
http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b.
Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very
specific restrictions. Having to build the code from source, especially with
modifications, is problematic.
- Dennis
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b.
Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very
specific restrictions. Having to build
[mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 08:11
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http
:11
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 08:11
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http://www.apache.org
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell and
libwpd?
This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases
since it was LGPL-only when OpenOffice 3.4.0 was released), but I expect
this to be the case if libwpd is
On 21 April 2013 22:49, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell
and libwpd?
This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases
since it was LGPL-only when
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that uses
libwpd?).
answer in
On 21 April 2013 23:55, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
something else to replace it
the
exception [;).
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 11:29
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote
Hi Jani,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss
something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that
uses libwpd?).
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jani,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss
something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
On 4/22/13 12:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
Hi Jani,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss
something.
If we do not have libwpd in our
15 matches
Mail list logo
