Currently our release performance says that we need 1 year for a release.
So far we have more issues with the release process then with the development
new feature process.
The whish to release 4.2.0 at end of this year is for our team super
challenging.
So I think we should take this challenge
Dave Fisher wrote:
BTW - Damjan’s changes are javadoc related and absolutely needed on modern Macs
where getting JDK7 is not easy. We cannot be so conservative that we are afraid
of upgrades.
Yes we can. And not only we can, but we should (a personal opinion of
course).
It must be clear
> On Oct 28, 2017, at 9:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> Unless the changes are also in 4.1.4 or are super-urgent, I do not think
>> they belong in 4.1.5. 4.1.5, which we hope will never be released, is
>> for fixes to 4.1.4 that are too urgent
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Unless the changes are also in 4.1.4 or are super-urgent, I do not think
they belong in 4.1.5. 4.1.5, which we hope will never be released, is
for fixes to 4.1.4 that are too urgent to wait for 4.2.
Confirmed. 4.2 should get all the focus. Nothing gets in AOO415 (which
Unless the changes are also in 4.1.4 or are super-urgent, I do not think
they belong in 4.1.5. 4.1.5, which we hope will never be released, is
for fixes to 4.1.4 that are too urgent to wait for 4.2.
On 10/27/2017 7:17 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Damjan,
A friend is sending me a JDK7.
But I
Am 28.10.2017 um 04:17 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> A friend is sending me a JDK7.
>
> But I agree.
>
> I think that these changes should be backported to 4.1.5. The redland and
> raptor updates should be backported too.
>
> RMs Jim / Matthias - what do you think?
Don't ask me, I only
Hi Damjan,
A friend is sending me a JDK7.
But I agree.
I think that these changes should be backported to 4.1.5. The redland and
raptor updates should be backported too.
RMs Jim / Matthias - what do you think?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 7:07 PM, Damjan
Apply these commits to 4.1.x and you'll be able to build AOO with Java 8:
1697228
1697237
1697247
1697306
1697312
I don't know why they haven't been backported yet.
Damjan
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> It is no longer easy to
Hi Matthias,
It is no longer easy to get EOLed JDKs. You have to pay Oracle for support. You
have to pay Apple to get the old SDKs you need for Mac OpenOffice. I don’t mind
paying Apple as I have the goal of trying to sign the Application to avoid
Gatekeeper. I have the Xcode stuff and I’ve
Am 27.10.2017 um 21:19 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi -
>
> As an aside I am working on Mac builds for 4.1.4 and it looks like uno does
> not like JDK 8+, something to do with javadocs, but not sure as I am looking
> for JDK7 …
Do you need the SDK?
From our release notes (Known Issues):
For
Am 27.10.2017 um 20:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 27.10.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver continues to
advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where "Refresh
Tables" causes everything done to tables from
Hi -
As an aside I am working on Mac builds for 4.1.4 and it looks like uno does not
like JDK 8+, something to do with javadocs, but not sure as I am looking for
JDK7 …
If I can get things working I will be willing to try builds for you on trunk or
a branch as you make changes.
Regards,
Dave
Am Freitag, den 27.10.2017, 11:18 +0200 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Hi
*wave*
>
> To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver
> continues to
> advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where
> "Refresh
> Tables" causes everything done to tables from then on to
Hi Damjan,
Am 27.10.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Hi
>
> To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver continues to
> advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where "Refresh
> Tables" causes everything done to tables from then on to fail (as Base
>
Hi
To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver continues to
advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where "Refresh
Tables" causes everything done to tables from then on to fail (as Base
keeps holding references to the old table/view/user/group containers, so
15 matches
Mail list logo