bject: Spam (8.03):Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>> > I agree with this -- it's history for every derivative of OO.o, not just
&
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>> > I agree with this -- it's history for every derivative of OO.o, not just
>> > AOO.
>>
>> It is not exactly the syllabic nucleus of the Vulcan language, but it
>>
rg
> Subject: Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Marcus wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> IMHO this is an invaluable source of our history that we shouldn't
&g
rt Duerr
Subject: Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > I agree with this -- it's history for every derivative of OO.o, not just
> > AOO.
>
> It is not exactly the syllabic nucleus of the V
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > I agree with this -- it's history for every derivative of OO.o, not just
> > AOO.
>
> It is not exactly the syllabic nucleus of the Vulcan language, but it
> could be useful. If someone can offer a better long-term place
On 2015-03-03 00:21, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 2015-02-28 23:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
It could be
even more useful, of course, if hosted as an actual (read-only)
repository, to consult the history of the code base.
Isn't this
f send this.
Regards,
-Rob
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 12:29
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
>
>
>
>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 2015-02-28 23:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> It could be
>>> even more useful, of course, if hosted as an actual (read-only)
>>> repository, to consult the history of the code base.
>>
>>
>> Isn't this part of Herb
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
Oh, duh ...
@rob,
I can send you a 500GB USB drive or even a 1.5TB SATA drive. Not sure what
format you could put on it, assuming you run Linux. NTFS is preferable but
FAT32 might work on the USB drive. Sometimes there are filename
On 2015-02-28 23:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
It could be
even more useful, of course, if hosted as an actual (read-only)
repository, to consult the history of the code base.
Isn't this part of Herbert's big git repo with the whole code history
that it was possible to reconstruct
in an SVN).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 12:29
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
Is the source code in this SVN identified as LGPL, along w
-- replying in-line to --
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 09:08
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> [ ... ]
> I'm not
- Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 14:11
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
>
> -- replying inline to --
> From: Rob
ennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 14:11
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
-- replying inline to --
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Sat
-- replying inline to --
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:38
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Marcus wr
Rob Weir wrote:
It could be
even more useful, of course, if hosted as an actual (read-only)
repository, to consult the history of the code base.
Isn't this part of Herbert's big git repo with the whole code history
that it was possible to reconstruct?
http://markmail.org/message/wsb7hurdrnzo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
>>
>> IMHO this is an invaluable source of our history that we shouldn't loose.
>
>
> I agree with this -- it's history for every derivative of OO.o, not just
> AOO.
>
>
>> Please save it at a
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> IMHO this is an invaluable source of our history that we shouldn't loose.
I agree with this -- it's history for every derivative of OO.o, not just
AOO.
> Please save it at a location where it cannot be deleted by accident. So,
> the best woul
Am 02/28/2015 07:48 PM, schrieb Regina Henschel:
Hi Rob,
Rob Weir schrieb:
I was cleaning up my office at home and I found an old external
harddrive with some SVN dumps on them.
One, at around 150 GB, is a dump of the legacy
http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo
It looks like OOo used SVN be
Hi Rob,
Rob Weir schrieb:
I was cleaning up my office at home and I found an old external
harddrive with some SVN dumps on them.
One, at around 150 GB, is a dump of the legacy
http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo
It looks like OOo used SVN before Mercurial, and this has file history
from th
I was cleaning up my office at home and I found an old external
harddrive with some SVN dumps on them.
One, at around 150 GB, is a dump of the legacy
http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo
It looks like OOo used SVN before Mercurial, and this has file history
from the migration from CVS to SVN i
21 matches
Mail list logo
