On 07/10/14 00:54, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 10/4/2014 1:57 AM, jan i wrote:
Thanks jürgen for the work you have done.
making a mac bot a priority seems to be easier said than done. We have had
a ticket open with infra for more than 2 years, and despite many pokes from
arist and myself, there
On 07/10/14 08:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 07/10/14 00:54, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 10/4/2014 1:57 AM, jan i wrote:
Thanks jürgen for the work you have done.
making a mac bot a priority seems to be easier said than done. We have had
a ticket open with infra for more than 2 years, and despite
On 05/10/14 19:06, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:21 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 4 October 2014 22:08, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/10/2014 jan i wrote:
Thanks jürgen for the work you have done.
Sure, thanks Juergen for being a great, reliable and
On 10/06/2014 12:33 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 05/10/14 19:06, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:21 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 4 October 2014 22:08, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/10/2014 jan i wrote:
Thanks jürgen for the work you have done.
On 10/4/2014 1:57 AM, jan i wrote:
Thanks jürgen for the work you have done.
making a mac bot a priority seems to be easier said than done. We have had
a ticket open with infra for more than 2 years, and despite many pokes from
arist and myself, there are still no date when we can have one
On 4 October 2014 22:08, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/10/2014 jan i wrote:
Thanks jürgen for the work you have done.
Sure, thanks Juergen for being a great, reliable and patient release
manager during these years.
In other words, I strongly believe we have to depend
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:21 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 4 October 2014 22:08, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/10/2014 jan i wrote:
Thanks jürgen for the work you have done.
Sure, thanks Juergen for being a great, reliable and patient release
manager during
: a new release is not going to happen before we have fixed
the release process. Part of this fix can be very challenging, like
bringing all building activities to Apache hardware. But we shouldn't
expect that what a release manager needs NOW is valid for the NEXT release.
A release manager does
a Mac build bot. But this discussion
should take place in a separate thread.
For now I would like to invite all of you to think about the release
manager role and if is something for you. I will not be available as
release manager for the next release.
Juergen
the role itself for AOO,
a project with more complicated release requirements than most others
at Apache.
If someone was considering stepping in as the Release Manager for the
next release, what should they be looking at? Is there a wiki page or
other documentation that defines the process?
Also
the Release Manager, but you defined the role itself for AOO,
a project with more complicated release requirements than most others
at Apache.
If someone was considering stepping in as the Release Manager for the
next release, what should they be looking at? Is there a wiki page or
other
as far as I'm
concerned! Thank you, Juergen.
If someone was considering stepping in as the Release Manager for the
next release, what should they be looking at? Is there a wiki page or
other documentation that defines the process?
not yet but we should collect the different pieces in one
efforts in this area. Not only
were you the Release Manager, but you defined the role itself for AOO,
a project with more complicated release requirements than most others
at Apache.
If someone was considering stepping in as the Release Manager for the
next release, what should they be looking
13 matches
Mail list logo
