I'm not sure if this is related but the last version that updates correctly
from 4.1.5 is r1816311 from Jim's archive
All newer versions return
dpkg: error processing archive openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite '/opt/openoffice4/program/gconfbe1.uno.so', which is
> What command line are you using? Are you installing all packages
> altogether? I mean, I would expect that all files in /opt/openoffice4/
> are overwritten by files from the newer packages, and this is just
> normal; but in your case it looks like there is a mismatch between the
> old "owner"
> > We had a discussion about special small update versions for Windows,
> > some time ago.
>
> We had experimented with patches some years ago, but never released them
> officially.
That would be a great evolution for AOO (LO has finally added that feature in
version 6). In fact saving peop
Hi Matthias
>
> > > That would be a great evolution for AOO (LO has finally added
> that feature in version 6).
> >
> > > AFAIK that feature didn't make it into 6.0:
> https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/ode_automatic_updater/
>
>
I read this version would include it
Maybe that is a UCBrowser problem or a temporary slow access to Sourceforge
(the link in your report works perfectly at my end)
In any case you can always download directly from Apache's server
http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.5/binaries/ru/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.5_Win_x86_install_ru
> Technically seen:
> To unpack the installation files and to start the installation with MSI.
>
> Historically seen:
> I don't know! ;-)
>
The nsis installer extracts and runs the MSVC runtime libraries installer
before running the AOO installer. Since AOO is compiled with MSVC i
Hi Leandro
Sourceforge is currently having some problems.
You can download directly from the Apache server
http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.5/binaries/he/
Hope this helps,
Pedro
> On March 16, 2018 at 8:12 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>
> Dave Brondsema wrote:
> > On 3/15/18 6:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >> For example, https://t.co/sZTK7wwASJ and https://t.co/HV0HdhJLGR (listed
> >> there)
> >> are still broken. And others from that list are broken too. But I gues
> On March 19, 2018 at 8:32 PM Dave Brondsema wrote:
>
>
> On 3/16/18 4:37 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
> > But Comments on extensions are still broken and return
> >
> > "Your comment is waiting for moderator approval.
> >
> > Error message
&
> On March 25, 2018 at 12:32 PM Marcus wrote:
> I tend to agree but the wording is important. With "official support"
> this would look like as we have built and tested on this platform. As we
> haven't done this we should avoid this misunderstanding.
>
> Instead we can say in a different for
Hi Damjan, all
> In r1828081 I ported multiple libraries and external dependencies with
> unusual naming to gbuild. Windows definitely builds, but other systems,
> particularly Mac and OS2, might not. Please test.
>
Build 1828108 Linux x86-64 installed on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS without any
Hi Damjan
I'm running AOO420m1(Build:9800) - Rev. 1828644 from the Buildbot under Windows
7 x64 without any problems.
Hope this helps...
Regards,
Pedro
> On April 11, 2018 at 12:29 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> First I thought it was a patch I was developing, but even w
> Localization is, so to say, under my "ownership" (meaning: it's an area
> where I've volunteered to lead the effort); but I can't commit to
> getting it done by a certain deadline right now. Volunteers welcome, of
> course; even beginners.
I have previously volunteered to get the Portuguese
Hi all
I just updated Java 8 and got a notification saying
"You have successfully installed Java.
Important Information about Oracle Java SE Roadmap:
Changes are coming which will impact your access to future releases of
Java SE from Oracle. Corporate users will be impacted as soon as
January 201
gt; >Phil
> >
> >This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Pedro Lino
> >wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I just updated Java 8 and got a notification saying
> >>
> >> "You
> People reading something, jumping to conclusions, and freaking out. Move
> along, nothing to see here...
>
I don't think so. Maybe there is a good reason why another office suite moved
all the scripting to Python.
> Facts: there are OpenJDK builds for Windows, Linux, Mac and even Linux
Hi Matthias, all
> It installs and works fine for me on Windows 10 (64-bit) and on Windows
> 7 (32-bit) but I would like to have some feedback from others. Please
> download and test it! [1]
>
Installed full pt version plus en_US language pack under Windows 7 x64.
It is working perfec
Hi Matthias
> Do you have Windows 32-bit available?
>
Only Windows XP 32-bit
> Things to test:
> Can you search for updates (AOO or Extension manager) without getting en
> error?
>
Both work perfectly (I downgraded one extension to check)
> Also the dialog under "Tools - Options..
comes in anothere package now this message appears.
>
> Regards
>
> Mechtilde
>
> Am 11.02.2018 um 23:05 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>
> > > On 11/02/2018 Pedro Lino wrote:
> >
> > > > > dpkg: error processing archive
&g
> On May 7, 2018 at 5:57 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.05.2018 um 20:04 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>
> > > Should I open an entry in the tracker?
> >
> > > Yes, please.
>
> This happ
Hi Matthias, all
> Next Windows build now with MozillaBuild 3.2:
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>
Installed full pt version plus en_US language pack under Windows 7 x64
Used it for real work all day. Approved ;)
Regards,
Pedro
I had replied earlier but directly to the OP.
Something is very wrong on the Apache server
ping ooo-updates.apache.org
PING ooo-updates.apache.org (40.79.78.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- ooo-updates.apache.org ping statistics ---
108 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1069
s transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2034ms
>
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
>
> Am 12.05.2018 um 08:28 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>
> > > I had replied earlier but directly to the OP.
> >
> > >
> &g
> On June 11, 2018 at 11:13 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> Am 11.06.2018 um 23:40 schrieb Marcus:
>
> > > Am 08.06.2018 um 19:01 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >
> > > > > The first bug report from a user:
> > > https://bz.a
Hi Andrea
> Our MWiki needs to be moved to a new server since Infra is replacing old
> hardware. It took some work and some help from Infra, but a test
> instance is now available on a new server at
>
> https://wikitest.openoffice.org
>
> Please test it as follows:
> - if you don't have an acc
> On July 15, 2018 at 10:09 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> MWiki accounts are created on request (to this list) and they are not
> the same as CWiki accounts. The current migration only concerns MWiki;
> CWiki is already on the new servers.
Can you please create an MWiki account associated to t
Hi Keith
> On July 16, 2018 at 3:43 PM "Keith N. McKenna" mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net > wrote:
>
> Due you have a preference for your user name or is pedlino (your cwiki
> username) OK
>
pedlino is fine. Thanks!
Regards,
Pedro
> On July 16, 2018 at 6:50 PM "Keith N. McKenna" mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net > wrote:
>
>
> Account has been created and a temporary password has been mailed under
> separate cover. It should be changed to one of your choice at first
> login by going to preferences and clicking
> On July 22, 2018 at 10:49 PM Kay Schenk wrote:
> As someone who is annoyed almost daily with font issues, the difference
> between 10pt and 11pt is quite a bit. :)
+1
Please do make that change!
Anyone else having problems with Calc's Sheet name text size under Linux on a
high DPI screen?
Hi all
The startcenter.desktop file says "The office productivity suite compatible to
the open and standardized ODF document format. Supported by Apache OpenOffice."
Shouldn't this be "The office productivity suite compatible *with* the open and
standardized ODF document format. Supported by th
Hi Matthias
> Yes, that wording always irritated me...
>
> On Windows the tooltips says:
> The office productivity suite compatible to the open and standardized
> ODF document format. Supported by The Apache Software Foundation.
>
I will then switch "compatible to" to "compatible
Hi Matthias
> Remember, the change would have to be localized for all available
> languages... ;-)
>
Yes, in theory. But there are still references to Sun and Oracle so that rule
has not been followed strictly ;)
In any case the important part is to do our best with the resources available
Hi Matthias
> I know of some references to Oracle/SUN. But if there is one in a
> released language, it must be corrected!
> You do have a Pootle account? ;-)
>
Isn't it the Pootle files that are not synced with the release?
Isn't it better to edit the .desktop file and just upload the
Hi Keith
Looks good ;)
Attached is the same in true vector hacked with the original Apache Powered by
from
https://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/poweredBy/
joined with Matthias Seidel fixed AOO logo
Regards,
Pedro
-
Hi Marcus
> the graphic looks great. When it contains also the new Apache feather,
> then it's perfect.
The Apache feather is not part of the AOO logo so there is no requirement to
include it
https://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/poweredBy/Template.PNG
as you can see from the jpg logos o
Hi Matthias
> But if you export it to bitmap the inner area is transparent. I think the
> logo should have white background.
>
It was deliberate. but I agree that in most cases it will work better with a
white background.
Done ;)
My hack (I am not an artist) is based on existing Apache art
Hi Keith, all
> Here is a link to a proposed "Powered By" Logo. All comments or offers
> to improve it are welcome.
> http://www.evernote.com/l/AY4y_8tHWYNGMpPJF1P2Glikiyhp58NZZ8o/
>
Attached are a slightly improved version of pb_OpenOffice and a version 2 using
the "black with stars"
Hi Dave, all
> The Apache Powered By Ring is a standard. Please do not alter the style.
>
???
> One thought that I had is our Powered by Apache OpenOffice could just put
> the Gulls circle logo in the middle of the Ring
>
Something like the attached image?
Regards,
Pedro
-
Hi David, all
>
> > >
> >
> > > > > The Apache Powered By Ring is a standard. Please do not
> > alter the style.
> > >
> > > > >
> > ???
> >
> > > I meant that we should be using the Star version from the
> > Foundation Powered By so that everyt
Hi all
I don't know what is the appropriate procedure but would like to request a vote
for the adoption of a corrected Apache OpenOffice logo vector file.
Most of you are aware that the current logo was created by Chris Rottensteiner .
Unfortunately all of the logos in vector format archived in
Maybe comment inline each glyph.
I would prefer not to modify the file at this point. In any case this email and
explanation are public.
Regards
Pedro
> > On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > I don't know what is the
Hi all
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 32-bit but when I click on
http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html
I am offered the Linux 32bit RPM.
Can someone verify/fix this?
Regards,
Pedro
> You are using Chrome?
>
>
No. I'm using the included browser Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32 bit)
> Can you post your User Agent?
> https://www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/user-agent/
>
> Firefox on my system (Ubuntu 16.94) has:
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101
> Firefox/61.0
>
> It identifies with "Ubuntu", so our website can guess the packag
> On September 1, 2018 at 10:15 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I am now using Opera 55 on Xubuntu 18.04.01 54 bit. Out of interest I
> accessed the download site and it wanted to download Linux 64-bit (x86-64)
> (RPM), whereas it should have been Linux 64-bit (x84-64) (DEB)
>
> My User Agent de
Hi Marcus
> On September 2, 2018 at 9:06 AM Marcus wrote:
> when you have problems with the download please have a look here:
> https://www.openoffice.org/download/analyze.html
That is an useful tool (maybe the link to it should be "Report download
problems" instead of "Report broken link")
A
Hi Matthias, all
> On September 2, 2018 at 9:36 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
> >> My suggestion would rather be to "fix" the existing graphic by only
> >> converting the TM to paths.
> >
>
> > > +1 for fixing the original one, instead of c
> On September 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> > > Maybe something changed in Debian/Ubuntu?
> >
> > > No, but is your version from the repos? It seems to be an ESR
> > (plain
> Mozilla, no Ubuntu in the User Agent).
>
Hi Rory, all
> On September 2, 2018 at 12:25 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > On a similar Xubuntu 18.04.01 64 bit machine, using Firefox I am
> > offered OO Linux 64-bit (x86-64) (DEB)
> >
> > On that machine User Agent details are
> > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_6
Actually that was not correct.
Mozilla provides the tar.bz2 when it detects Linux...
Ah, well...
> On September 2, 2018 at 12:41 PM Pedro Lino wrote:
> Curiously, the previous link offers me the right DEBS so we (AOO) we need to
> find out how Mozilla does it... Anyone with an RPM bas
Hi Rory, all
> On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> It may be useful to know that the terminal command
> inxi -S
>
> will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to do so of
> which I am not aware.
inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release
Hi Jon
> I've bought the professional version of Andropen Office Professional
> under account jonathan.simpso...@gmail.com, great app.
> In the latest update have you updated the bottom bar to include access to
> various Andropen Office options? I can't recall it being there previously.
Hi Matthias, all
> I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Base
> and Math.
>
> Opinions?
>
According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3
"On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". Tha
Hi Hagar
> On September 15, 2018 at 11:18 AM Hagar Delest wrote:
> There was an error during the installation
> (Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US_2018-09-12_16_19_52_1840718.tar.gz)
> Package in error: openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install)
> belonging to openoffi
Hi Matthias, all
> On September 15, 2018 at 10:21 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
> Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-)
> And *please* give feedback!
>
Please do include this in version 4.1.6 for Linux!
For those who
Hi Matthias, all
>
> > >
> > > Maybe someone can also test it on KDE and on pure Debian?
>
The new icons are looking perfect under Debian Stretch (9.5) x86 using build
AOO420m1(Build:9800) - Rev. 1841506
2018-09-20_22:11:13-Rev.1841519
BTW please someone fix the rev numbers
Hi Matthias
> On September 24, 2018 at 7:53 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 24.09.2018 um 20:49 schrieb Peter kovacs:
>
> > > Maybe the One with .net 4 dies still Work?
> >
> > >
> > > https://www.microsoft.co
Hi Matthias, all
> On October 13, 2018 at 8:06 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> But maybe we should start with 16.04? That is supported until 2021.
> I think I managed to build, but ran out of disk space in my VM...
>
I'm running Ubuntu 16.04.5 LT
Hi Andrea
Thank you for the fast answer!
> Sure it is. With 60GB you can build all languages. For a test build
> (English only) you won't need more than 10GB.
Yes, i would prefer to start with a simple test case.
> > How long will it take to build AOO on a Intel® Core™ i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz
Hi all
I have come across the first two problems:
1) E: Package 'openjdk-7-jdk' has no installation candidate
I installed openjdk-8 instead
2) The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgstreamer-ocaml : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3
Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2bui
Hi Gavin
> What build instructions have you been following so far?
>
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_12.04
but checking the 14.04 changes if needed
>
> > > Is someone going to be online today on IRC or available
> for d
Hi Matthias
> On October 14, 2018 at 11:34 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
> I think I managed it with these instructions. But ignored most of the
> warnings, as they are fixed already (either in Ubuntu or in AOO branch).
>
Ok. So any instructions on how
> JDK 8 is OK as long as you use --disable-odk in configure.
> Hopefully we can get a patch into 4.1.6 that will allow us to build ODK
> with Java 8
>
Excellent! Thank you for confirming.
-disable-odk is included in the Step-by-step guide so that is what I will be
using
Regards,
Pe
Hi Keith
> Thanks for taking on this experiment. I have created a 16.04 stub in the
> step by step building guide. I am more than willing to help with adding
> information to the guide.
>
Thanks!
I'm waiting on Peter Kovac's feedback to move forward.
If anyone else has some pointers
Hi Marcus, all
> On October 16, 2018 at 11:16 PM Marcus wrote:
> > 1) For versions until 4.1.5 (our current one) links for MD5 hash values
> > are still offered but no longer for newer versions.
> >
> > 2) When Linux is choosen as platform, a new link "RPM vs. DEB = What to
> > choose?" is of
Hi Marcus, all
> On October 17, 2018 at 8:13 PM Marcus wrote:
> OK, a suggestion:
>
> Let's do the 4.1.6 release and look closely for such comments. When
> there are many comments that DEB would be the better default then we
> should change it.
Sounds like a good plan! Thanks!
Regards
Pedro
Hi Jim
Can you please upload pt (European Portuguese)?
Thanks
Pedro
> On October 19, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> Builds for macOS and Linux 64bit (CentOS5) can be found at:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>
> 32bit CentOS will either be over the weekend or Mon
Hi Matthias, all
> On October 20, 2018 at 10:46 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
> But has anyone else "Copyright © 2017" in the About Box?
> Builds from our buildbots and my own Windows builds have "Copyright ©
> 2018" and I am wondering about the dif
Hi Matthias
> On October 20, 2018 at 11:26 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
>
> > > I can confirm that it is running as expected under Ubuntu 16.04
> x64 (Thanks Jim!)
> >
> > >
> > > The About box does have a quite different text compare
> But even if I wanted, I can not change the copyright year...
> That's what I am wondering about. ;-)
>
Ok. I (wrongly) assumed it was all editable :)
> BTW: Can you confirm 2017 as copyright year in Jim's Linux builds?
>
>
Yes, Jim's build is showing 2017.
Regards,
Pedro
Hi all
> On October 22, 2018 at 5:38 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.10.18 um 18:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
> > > The thing is, IMO, that these ARE community builds, and, as such,
> should be noted as such on the About Page... But I'm fi
Hi Andrea, all
This is clearly a server side error (and an intermitent one)
I rolled back to 4.1.4 (which was correctly reporting an update available last
week) but today all versions I tested (4.1.6, 4.1.5 and 4.1.4) all report
"Checking for an update failed."
This is not a 4.1.6 problem.
Reg
Hi Peter, all
> The release Manager has to much load at the moment. I have initiated the
> vote just now.
Just to make sure we are all on the same page: 4.1.6-RC1 refers to Rev. 1844227
available from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.6-RC1/
right?
Regards,
Pedro
-
> On October 31, 2018 at 10:13 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
> But it is revision 1844436, isn't it?
>
Correct!
AOO416m1(Build:9790) - Rev. 1844436
2018-10-23 07:03 - Linux x86_64
Regards,
Pedro
Hi all
I really would like to build from source (at least under Linux)!
But first I found a problem checking the src file integrity.
I'm using Double Commander's option Verify Checksum and all sha256 work
correctly.
However for the sha512, the content of the file is
SHA512(./apache-openoffi
Hi Patricia
I'm taking this opportunity to write to you directly (I hope this is not a
problem)
Do you have experience building in Linux?
I have found this obstacle but no one on the dev mailing list answered (which
worries me since I have been trying to contribute to this project...)
Any ide
Hi Jim, all
> On November 1, 2018 at 1:09 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> ...
> > libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version
> > (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2).
> > libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed.
> > libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version
> > (0.1
Hi Marcus
> Please can you check it with the board-tools of Ubuntu? I think you also
> should have sha256sum and sha512sum as commands.
It does work for the src file with sha512sum so Double Commander is less
versatile. But wouldn't it make sense to keep the two SHA files similar (i.e.
*?
Ac
Hi Marcus
> it doesn't matter if you have the base, good or bad or ... package. But
> the version number must be the same for all.
>
> Correct:
> libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10-0
>
> Problem:
> libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0
> libgstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0-0
Hi Matthias, all
> On November 2, 2018 at 12:33 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
> I have just corrected the script to have identical output for SHA256 and
> SHA512.
>
Thank you! It works correctly with any program!
>
> > > AFAIK the data is c
--
The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests.
[x ] yes / +1
I have tested
Windows Release
[ x] binary
Installed the Full Portuguese (pt) installer plus
Hi Matthias
> On November 6, 2018 at 2:35 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 02.11.18 um 11:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>
> > > Hi Matthias, all
> >
> > > >
>
Hi Peter, all
Thank you for sharing this report.
I'm happy to read that there is collaboration between the two projects (at
least on a local scale)
This should be the rule, not the exception...
ODF adoption is indeed very important, especially now that Microsoft is making
their file format not
Hi Peter, all
I have successfully compiled (under 16.04 x64) and tested the patched 4.1.6
build under 18.04 x64 and 16.04 x64 and I can confirm that the crash no longer
occurs. The user can click in the Master tab and use the master slides.
Best,
Pedro
> On November 8, 2018 at 9:18 PM Peter K
> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch
> that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive complexity (build
> requirements). The Serf upgrade was meant to supplement WebDAV fixes in
> 4.1.2.
>
> So you mi
Hi all
Any news on fixing the "Checking for an update failed." problem?
Regards,
Pedro
Hi Andrea, all
> On November 16, 2018 at 12:10 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> If someone can provide a predictable way to reproduce the issue
> consistently, solving it will likely be trivial.
I receive the error message daily on any computer I use,regardless of location,
AOO version or OS (Windo
> On November 16, 2018 at 11:54 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Can you provide output of the following commands?
>
> $ host ooo-updates.apache.org
ooo-updates.apache.org has address 40.79.78.1
ooo-updates.apache.org has address 95.216.24.32
ooo-updates.apache.org has IPv6 address 2a01:4f9:2a:185f:
> On November 16, 2018 at 4:02 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> In particular, the last output above shows that you can successfully
> download the update feed to your computer. You can replace "416" in the
> URL with the OpenOffice version you are actually running if you wish to
> be 100% sure.
Hi Andrea, Branko, all
> On November 16, 2018 at 8:25 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Just restart OpenOffice after each edit and check if now the update
> server can be found. Then you should go back to the original version of
> the file to avoid that further testing is influenced by the change.
Hi Andrea, all
I don't know if this is relevant but ping to 40.79.78.1 does not work. I can
only send/receive packets to/from 95.216.24.32
Regards,
Pedro
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For addit
> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to
> the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you
> can open URLs directly from within the application.
I use that feature daily to edit
wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > Am 17.11.18 um 11:26 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti
> >>> wrote:
> >>> Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to
> >>> the O
> On November 17, 2018 at 5:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to
> reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification.
>
> $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html
> (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora)
>
> Note t
> On November 18, 2018 at 12:00 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example:
>
> curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/
The output is below
* Trying 95.216.24.32...
* Connected to www.openoffice.org (95.216.24.32) port 443 (#0)
* found 148 c
> On November 18, 2018 at 2:48 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example:
> > curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/
>
> Thanks, if the issue is with SSL this indeed helps in finding more
> details. Still, curl will always work also on aff
Hi Brane, all
> On November 19, 2018 at 12:52 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> > Does the Apache web server still support TLS version 1.0? The old
> > version of OpenSSL that we bundle with the Windows and Linux versions
> > doesn't support anything newer than that.
>
>
> It looks like you found the
> On November 19, 2018 at 5:17 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Does the current explanation actually explain why the first command
> succeeds on Fedora? (of course, this also reflects in GUI, where the
> check for updates only succeeds on Fedora).
Not at all. If the problem was simply on the TLS
Hola
Si, existe una versión en Español.
En
https://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html
deberá detectar automáticamente tu idioma.
Si no, lo puedes bajar directamente desde
http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.6/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_install_es.exe
Saludos cordia
Hi Andrea, all
> On November 19, 2018 at 5:17 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > Can this change be reversed or an exception opened for AOO?
>
> Sure, we have multiple options available. Including moving this server
> to a smaller (or even dedicated) virtual machine. Note that, even if we
> miss a
501 - 600 of 627 matches
Mail list logo
