Re: [dev] Asian CJK Group Announced!

2006-07-19 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Stanley and all, Congrantulations! Thanks. > This group will allow these three projects to share experiences on > common L10N and I18N issues We often face gsl issues such as font rendering, vertical writing, use of grid, pdf export etc. I hope the Group help share our experience and improv

Re: [dev] Asian CJK Group Announced!

2006-07-19 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Jianhua and all, On 7/18/06, jiao jianhua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good luck. Thanks. Developer's help are essential to improve CJK functionality, usability and accessibility. Please feel free adding your idea to improve them at: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/CJK_Group Regards,

[dev] OOoMacroScanner

2006-07-19 Thread Christoph Lutz
Hi, I wrote a java program that scanns a batch of documents for contained macros and creates summaries about them. Perhaps this might be interesting for one of you http://www.wolutz.de/wiki/index.php/OOoMacroScanner_%28En%29 regards, Christoph Lutz -

Re: [dev] Set default posSize for new created Windows

2006-07-19 Thread Tom Schindl
You could add this Snippet to our collection: http://codesnippets.services.openoffice.org/ Tom Christoph Lutz schrieb: > Hi Carsten, > > On 7/14/06, Carsten Driesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You can see that the configuration set "Factories" contains nodes for >> every appplication module,

[dev] Re: paragraph number

2006-07-19 Thread Gloops
Hello, I have read somewhere that version 2.0.3 does that easily. ___ On 18th of July 2006 02:40, Mohammad Alhammouri wrote : Hello there, is there a similar function to the page number function xPageCursor.getPage(), that finds the paragra

Re: [dev] Seeking for guide

2006-07-19 Thread Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany
Mathias Bauer wrote: Xu, Shenshen wrote: Hello Everybody, Could anybody tell me what is the meaning of the return value of IMPL_LINK, I found some of the codes return 0L and few of the codes return 1L, I wonder what the difference is ? The meaning is that returning "0" means that the link wa

Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules

2006-07-19 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germa ny
Hi Stephan, > forgive me if I missed this in >>the thread: About which order of magnitued do we talk here? 10 places? >>1? > > 10^2--10^3 would be my guess Hmm, that's quite a lot ... Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems

Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules

2006-07-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Stephan, In the case of sal_Bool, it might be true that false is a better default value than true (no pun intended), but that need not be the case always, so you would have to analyze each place in the code where you add "= false", which is

Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules

2006-07-19 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germa ny
Hi Stephan, > In the case of sal_Bool, it might be true that false is a better default > value than true (no pun intended), but that need not be the case always, > so you would have to analyze each place in the code where you add "= > false", which is tedious due to the large number of places i

[dev] Mac Os X - X11 ?

2006-07-19 Thread Jens R. Knutsen
Hvor kan jeg få tak i tillegget X11 for å kunne bruke OpenOffice på min maskin med operativsysten Mac OS X, versjon 10.4.7? Mvh Jens R. Knutsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tlf 76952281 - mobnr; 905 03 178

Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules

2006-07-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Stephan, So, it seems that we have used the wrong operator here. Therefor I tend to agree to Frank, that we may want to fix this. The choice of operator is indeed unfortunate. However, I do not agree that - T b; + T b = T(); is in g

Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules

2006-07-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Stephan Bergmann wrote: Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Hi, please correct me, if I am wrong. I understand this as a 'C' inherited C++ oddity (no constructors for integral values), which leads to a warning if the first operation on the integr