Ian Lynch wrote (9-6-2008 22:02)
I wish you the best of luck in getting a more democratic and
participative Community Council. If you look back over the archives for
the last 4 years you will see quite a few people who committed a lot of
time to the project giving up. Sadly the project simply lo
Hi Andre,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 15:25 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> The council in it's current structure seems very centralistic to me
> (it's almost built around the project leads).
Sure, it's a problem wrt. generating interest and participation.
> Anyway - it would need time to disc
Hello Charles,
I have already answered to Suren's question and I propose him to collaborate
with us.
Now I hope for his positive answer.
Regards,
Artavazd
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles-H. Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 3:33 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.
Thanks Sascha. That was it. :clap:
Cheers,
Anupam.
Sascha Jensen wrote:
>
> Hi,
> just guessing: You use the wrong variable to extract the
> ControlProperties. Your for-loop defines a virable j, but you are using i.
>
> Agnisys schrieb:
>> Hello all,
>> I'm trying to read a Writer (OO 2.4)
Hi,
just guessing: You use the wrong variable to extract the
ControlProperties. Your for-loop defines a virable j, but you are using i.
Agnisys schrieb:
Hello all,
I'm trying to read a Writer (OO 2.4) form in Java (IDE: Netbeans 6.1, java
1.6u6) on Windows 2003. I have two buttons in the for
Hello all,
I'm trying to read a Writer (OO 2.4) form in Java (IDE: Netbeans 6.1, java
1.6u6) on Windows 2003. I have two buttons in the form but the PropertySet
always gives me information for the first one that was added when the form
was created! Here is the relevant code snippet ...
:
hi!
for those of you who are building extensions in the OOo/SO environment,
the following link could be of interest:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_packing
beginning with DEV300_m18 the makefiles in
reportdesign/util
filter/source/pdfimport
sdext/source/minimizer
show the
OS : Windows 2003
Make : mingw32-make-3.81
Java : 1.6u6
OO : 2.4
Out of box, IDLC gives following error when compiling IDL files from the
example dir.
E.g:
E:> e:/tools/mingw32-make-3.81/bin/make
mkdir E:\\ids\\out\\OpenOffice.org_2\\WINexample.out\\misc\\ToDo
"E:\tools\openoffice\OpenO
Hi,
Le 9 juin 08 à 12:26, Bernd Eilers a écrit :
Suren Khachatryan wrote:
Hello OpenOffice,
Hi there!
I would like work on translating OpenOffice to my native language -
Armenian.
Do you know anyone working on it?
You can find the Armenian OpenOffice language community and
OpenOffic
Suren Khachatryan wrote:
Hello OpenOffice,
Hi there!
I would like work on translating OpenOffice to my native language - Armenian.
Do you know anyone working on it?
You can find the Armenian OpenOffice language community and
OpenOffice.org localized to your native language here:
http:
Maybe using "magic" was a poor choice to begin with. We could
extend the above wiki page to list exactly which GCC/libstdc++
combination is used in each case.
Is used while compiling and is used for the final instsets, right?
Two columns...
--
Pavel Janík
--
Pavel Janík wrote:
Hi,
It's not magic at all. It comes from the used compiler. Always been
so. And the compiler version is documented here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maintainers_and_release_engineers
Heiner, yes. This is the current status quo.
Pavel,
Kurt got the task to switch to gcc-4.2.3 before the final. In principe
this is easy but ... the major issue with that is to upgrade all our
build machines and still be able to do the old build.
With that gcc-4.2.3 will come a new libstdc++ ... problem solved :)
Heiner
PS: We might as
Hi,
It's not magic at all. It comes from the used compiler. Always been
so. And the compiler version is documented here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/
Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maintainers_and_release_engineers
Heiner, yes. This is the current status quo. And sb wants to cha
Hi,
On 9.6.2008, at 9:27, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I still fail to understand your reasons to oppose to the proposed
change when the status quo is apparently OK for you. Sun Hamburg
builds with GCC X and includes in install sets libstdc++.so version
Y. What changes over time (through the
Pavel Janík wrote:
Hi,
You misunderstand me; I guess I was not clear enough.
you was perfectly clear.
1 Sun Hamburg Linux builds include a libstdc++.so.6 that comes from
somewhere "by magic"; it is not checked into CVS. That is already how
it works for a long time, and probably will not
16 matches
Mail list logo
