Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread rony
Hi Sigrid, thank you very much for your interesting and helpful answers! * the package (3.2.1) just has an update script, but not an install script which makes it very cumbersome to install the genuine OOo from all the individual packages in the DEB subdirectory (after

[dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread rony
Björn, On 16.08.2010 16:56, Björn Michaelsen wrote: Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:12:50 +0200 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at: Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100% compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with the genuine OOo ? At

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote: (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows my packages and breaks them at times, but what you experience could

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread rony
Hi René, On 17.08.2010 21:05, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote: (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows my