Hi,
On 16.08.2010 21:16, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Nitin Mohan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is with reference to the earlier mail sent by me regarding the
>> questionnaire for our research. We are doing a research study on how
>> different projects handle bugs an
Hi René,
On 17.08.2010 21:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled
>> over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read
>>
> Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote:
> (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled
> over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read
Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows my packages and breaks them at times,
but what you experience coul
Björn,
On 16.08.2010 16:56, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:12:50 +0200
> schrieb "Rony G. Flatscher" :
>
>
>> Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100%
>> compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with the genuine OOo ?
>>
> At least openoffic
Hi Sigrid,
thank you very much for your interesting and helpful answers!
>>* the package (3.2.1) just has an "update" script, but not an
>> "install" script which makes it very cumbersome to install the
>> genuine OOo from all the individual packages in the DEB
>> subdirectory
