Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Not linked against - it's different. As an example, many Writer code
will fail if the desktop service or some others have been destroyed
already. Where's the guarantee that the desktop will still exist when
the Writer dll gets unloaded? When will it be unloaded
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
> Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mathias, Caolan,
>>>
>>> IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
>>> library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). T
Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Mathias, Caolan,
IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). This would
also avoid the problems we are every once a while facin
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
> Hi Mathias, Caolan,
>
> IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
> library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). This would
> also avoid the problems we are every once a while facing regarding
> shutdown ...
Hi Mathias, Caolan,
IMHO right approach for _all_ library (de-)initialization is to use the
library c'tors / d'tors (AKA _init / _exit, DLLMAIN etc.). This would
also avoid the problems we are every once a while facing regarding
shutdown ...
Kay
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Caolán McNamara
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 23:41 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> Caolán McNamara wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> >> But the "Exit" method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
>> >> do so. The only known problem this create
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 23:41 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> >> But the "Exit" method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
> >> do so. The only known problem this creates is that it prevents the
> >>
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> But the "Exit" method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
>> do so. The only known problem this creates is that it prevents the
>> detection of memory leaks caused by the objects that now never get
>
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:11 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> But the "Exit" method now is never called and IMHO it isn't necessary to
> do so. The only known problem this creates is that it prevents the
> detection of memory leaks caused by the objects that now never get
> deleted.
Possibly still th
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> So all those ScDLL::Exit, and SmDLL::Exit etc. Where/When are they
> supposed to be called ? Did they ever get called sometime in the past ?
IIRC they have been called in former times where a part of each
"applications" code was statically linked into the "ofa"-dll. This
So all those ScDLL::Exit, and SmDLL::Exit etc. Where/When are they
supposed to be called ? Did they ever get called sometime in the past ?
C.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
11 matches
Mail list logo