[dev] Re: [tools-perf] Re: [dev] Benchmarking multiple versions of OOo

2008-04-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:40 -0600, Andrew Z wrote: > > What I really want is something like Michael's > > http://live.gnome.org/iogrind but that just says "your app burned up > > 110,000 bogoios and 90,000,000 bogocpus" and every time you run it it > > says "110,000 bogoios and 90,000,000 bogocups

[dev] benchmarking multiple versions of OOo

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Ziem
Hello, I benchmarked OpenOffice.org 1.1.5 through 3.0.0 m3 to identify trends, and I'm quasi-privately offering the benchmark system and the results to you, the experts, before I publish anything. **Method 1. I simulate a cold start (this marks the beginning of a "pass"). 2. I use Python

Re: [dev] Benchmarking multiple versions of OOo

2008-04-07 Thread Andrew Z
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:10:25 +0100, "Caolan McNamara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:39 -0600, Andrew Z wrote: > > > **Thoughts > > 1. The cold start simulator is not perfect. The first pass of the > > first iteration is generally the slower than the first iteration >

Re: [dev] Benchmarking multiple versions of OOo

2008-04-07 Thread Caolan McNamara
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:39 -0600, Andrew Z wrote: > **Thoughts > 1. The cold start simulator is not perfect. The first pass of the > first iteration is generally the slower than the first iteration > of the second pass. The difference varies from -0.93s to +5.92s. I ran some tests at

[dev] Benchmarking multiple versions of OOo

2008-04-07 Thread Andrew Z
Hello, I benchmarked OpenOffice.org 1.1.5 through 3.0.0 m3 to identify trends, and I'm quasi-privately offering the benchmark system and the results to you, the experts, before I publish what I plan as the first article in a performance series. **Method 1. I simulate a cold start (this marks the