Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Thorsten Behrens wrote: Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, but any reference counter increase/decrease still needs to be atomic as long as they are not thread local? How can we replace them with plain integer operations? Hi Heiner, well, when shared only within _one_ UTF2

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Hi Michael, With UTF2 you mean Uno Threading Framework 2? I can see how it helps the performance if we reduce mutex locking (especially Solar-Mutex, of course) but naively I would assume that reference counter as programming concept are mostly independent from

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-06 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Platform Solutions Group Intel Corporation michael.leibowitz at intel.com +1 503 264 7621 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:39 AM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements Hi Michael

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-06 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With UTF2 you mean Uno Threading Framework 2? I can see how it helps the performance if we reduce mutex locking (especially Solar-Mutex, of course) but naively I would assume that reference counter as

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-06 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, but any reference counter increase/decrease still needs to be atomic as long as they are not thread local? How can we replace them with plain integer operations? Hi Heiner, well, when shared only within _one_ UTF2 thread-unsafe

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-04 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Christian, On Thursday, 2006-11-02 12:01:09 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Just take http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/performance_gain_of_factor_15 as an example. It surely increses performance significantly - but only for a small part of the documents out there... Actually a

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-03 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
-Original Message- From: Utomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:07 PM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: RE: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements Thanks for the suggestions. My original idea was. To make Ooo faster opening the Microsoft Office files. (but without

RE: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-03 Thread Leibowitz, Michael
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:39 AM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements Hi Michael, slightly off topic, but speaking of performance improvements: Didn't these numbers about

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-03 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
to measure how long opening a files is. ( I think judges will help decide it) What do you think ? Best Regards, Utomo -Original Message- From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:35 AM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [dev] Bounty

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
AM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements Please don't fullquote. Utomo wrote: [...] Performance should be quantified and explained by the submitter. In other words, the submitter should indicate how to test and demonstrate a speed improvement

RE: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-02 Thread Leibowitz, Michael
, Channel Platform Solutions Group Intel Corporation michael.leibowitz at intel.com +1 503 264 7621 -Original Message- From: Utomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:07 PM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: RE: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements Thanks

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-01 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Utomo wrote: I am waiting and open for suggestions. Is there somebody can help me to determine how is the performance improvements measured ? Utomo I have a few comments: Performance should be quantified and explained by the submitter. In other words, the submitter should indicate how to

RE: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-01 Thread Utomo
- From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:35 AM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements Utomo wrote: I am waiting and open for suggestions. Is there somebody can help me to determine how

RE: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-01 Thread Kirill S. Palagin
-Original Message- From: Utomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:07 AM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: RE: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements Thanks for the suggestions. My original idea was. To make Ooo faster opening the Microsoft Office

[dev] Bounty for performance improvements (was: Why I no longer do beta testing for OOo)

2006-10-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Utomo, *, On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:56:23PM +0700, Utomo wrote: Yes it will be difficult to measure. Or do you think better to start it first (the bounty) But we will post the detail method to measure it as well the sample files, in one month ? (I know it is not so good idea) I don't