Shawn McDermott wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Shawn McDermott wrote:
[snip]
I have installed gcj and I am playing around with it. so far 1.9.100
does not run 'out of the box' with gcj.
That means that there is still something to do. :-)
But gcj is not the only way. There are other
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Shawn McDermott wrote:
[snip]
I have installed gcj and I am playing around with it. so far 1.9.100
does not run 'out of the box' with gcj.
That means that there is still something to do. :-)
But gcj is not the only way. There are other projects we could try, and
the
Sophie Gautier wrote:
As I havn't seen this link pointed yet here, may be you'll be interested
in this initiative called Apache Harmony
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200505.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's a bit more:
Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this link. It seems the RMS
wants to fork OpenOffice.org due to its reliance on JDK.
Thoughts,
Kevin
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
From: Bruce Byfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 8,
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Someone just informed me off-list that this email could be taken the
wrong way. I'd like to clarify that what I mean to say is let's not
dwell on this. Personally, I don't think that a fork would be
successful, but what I was trying to say is that we shouldn't make
vy.ho wrote:
Should they fork JBoss because it runs on none-free Java too?
If they want to spend their time forking JBoss, I'm not going to lose
any sleep over it. Let them be.
If they want a none-free Java, create one, not OOo. And don't steal Sun's
property. Create one, not asking Sun to
Daniel Carrera wrote:
If they want to spend their time forking JBoss, I'm not going to lose
any sleep over it. Let them be.
JBoss is just an example of their argument. Forking is fine with me too
on open source stuff. However, the reason behind it (because it runs
on Java) does not sound
vy.ho wrote:
JBoss is just an example of their argument. Forking is fine with me too
on open source stuff. However, the reason behind it (because it runs
on Java) does not sound right to me.
It doesn't sound right to me either. I think that energy would be better
spent on one of the free Java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
vy.ho wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
If they want to spend their time forking JBoss, I'm not going to lose
any sleep over it. Let them be.
JBoss is just an example of their argument. Forking is fine with me too
on open source stuff.
Rene Engelhard wrote:
This is another case. JBoss is a Java app. It would be better to make it
work with free JDKs (does it?, no idea) but it's still a Java servlet so
it's obvious it needs Java.
Whereas OpenOffice.org is a Office productivity suite which has some
important functionality written
10 matches
Mail list logo
