Re: [dev] Re: XML Import Filter

2009-08-11 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
It would not be hard to do that. There might be lots of solutions. This is one of the examples: http://distribution.openoffice.org/source/browse/distribution/mirrors/repository/production/tools/Calc/ The key you might have been looking for would be: 1. Name the filter as you like and fill

Re: [dev] Re: XML Import Filter

2009-08-11 Thread Jakob Mandalka
But this I don't understand. At the moment I open my document this way document = application.getDocumentService().loadDocument(iFrame, location + \\ + file.getFullPath().toOSString(), DocumentDescriptor.DEFAULT); This will open a document. And now? How I spezifiy here now a Filter and and

[dev] Re: [project leads] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-11 Thread eric.bachard
Hi Florian, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi Eric, first of all, sorry for my late reply - quite many things are going on at the moment, and I didn't have the time to drop you a line earlier. I didn't have the time to read through all mails of this thread, so sorry if I missed something

Re: [dev] Re: OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-11 Thread eric.bachard
Hi Gabriel, Gabriel Gurley a écrit : Hi Eric, I apologize for the delay in replying as well. No problem : I'm myself overbusy, and I perfectly understand the delays :) I think Florian summed up my sentiments very well. I too very much support OOo4Kids and and think it could be extremely

Re: [dev] Re: [project leads] Re: [dev] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Hi Eric, all, first of all i would like to propose to move any further discussion on only one mailing list. Maybe dev@openoffice.org because the d...@education is not part of this thread. eric.bachard wrote: Hi Juergen, Juergen Schmidt a écrit : Martin Hollmichel wrote: I like and

[dev] Re: [project leads] Re: [dev] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-10 Thread eric b
Hi, Le 9 août 09 à 12:40, Andrea Pescetti a écrit : I support the idea of a version of OOo tailored for 7-12 years old students. And I say you thank you very much, for your support ! That said, I expected that the initial effort went more in the direction of including additional

[dev] Re: [project leads] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-10 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi Eric, first of all, sorry for my late reply - quite many things are going on at the moment, and I didn't have the time to drop you a line earlier. I didn't have the time to read through all mails of this thread, so sorry if I missed something important. :-) I already saw OOo4Kids and I

[dev] Re: OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-10 Thread Gabriel Gurley
Hi Eric, I apologize for the delay in replying as well. I think Florian summed up my sentiments very well. I too very much support OOo4Kids and and think it could be extremely useful for instructional purposes in the 7-12 age bracket. But I'm also afraid I'm in the same boat as Florian

[dev] Re: [l10n-dev] specs for Migration analysis module in 3.2

2009-08-10 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi Sophie, d...@openoffice.org brought that into the source code with cws paw06 . Please ask him for further info. Cheers, Ivo Sophie wrote: Hi all, (added d...@l10n in CC so the l10n teams are aware) For the next 3.2 version, we have a UI localization directory migrationanalysis which

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] specs for Migration analysis module in 3.2

2009-08-10 Thread Sgauti
Hi Ivo, Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: Hi Sophie, d...@openoffice.org brought that into the source code with cws paw06 . Please ask him for further info. Thank you. EIS doesn't provide any information too, so I'll ask him. Kind regards Sophie

[dev] Re: libxml2 dependency on zlib

2009-08-10 Thread Michael Stahl
Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 07/20/09 11:49, Stephan Bergmann wrote: So, if nobody requests continued support for zlib in libxml2, I will disable that feature in one of the next DEV300 builds. Removed as http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/sb113/rev/9f8e75ebe727. Dropping the

[dev] Re: Duplicated header contents in svx

2009-08-08 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Kohei Yoshida kyoshida at novell.com writes: The bad news is that this file is not the only file with duplicated content. In the same directory, I've found several other headers with the same duplication problem. AccessibleStaticTextBase.hxx and acorrcfg.hxx are also affected, quite

[dev] Re: [project leads] Re: [dev] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-08 Thread eric.bachard
Hi Martin, Sorry, was away all the day yesterday. Martin Hollmichel a écrit : eric.bachard wrote: [please continue the discussion on the dev@openoffice.org mailing list] The OpenOffice.org Education Project proposes to drive the following experimentation : - create a dedicated branch in the

Re: [dev] Re: Error building on cygwin: Missing nsIAbLDAPAttributeMap.h

2009-08-08 Thread T. J. Frazier
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: T. J. Frazier tjfrazier at cfl.rr.com writes: My thought is to put the table itself at the top ... Yeah, maybe that would be better. Originally, I intended not having that stuff on the top because a big table might scare away newcomers. Go ahead, Ill have a look

Re: [dev] Re: Duplicated header contents in svx

2009-08-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Björn, *, On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Bjoern Michaelsenbjoern.michael...@sun.com wrote: Kohei Yoshida kyoshida at novell.com writes: The bad news is that this file is not the only file with duplicated content.  In the same directory, I've found several other headers with the same

[dev] Re: Duplicated header contents in svx

2009-08-08 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Christian Lohmaier cloph at openoffice.org writes: No, not true. it was added with os128 Oh, ups - Im too dump to use opengroks history differ. True, but of course for the correct cws. Ok, I will have a look next week (as os is on vacation). I will try to have a look too at the cws commits to

[dev] Re: [project leads] Re: [dev] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-08 Thread eric.bachard
Hi Juergen, Juergen Schmidt a écrit : Martin Hollmichel wrote: I like and support this idea, me too and i support the idea as well. Thank you very much for your support too ! I was a big fan of StarOffice4Kids project Same for me : Long time ago, I even asked for see the sources, but

Re: [dev] Re: OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-08 Thread eric.bachard
Hi Horst, Horst Salzwedel a écrit : Hi Eric + all, congratulations for the great idea of doing an OOo version for education. Like MS Office, OOo has functionality aimed for offices and does not consider the requirements for education and learning. That's the generic feedback indeed.

[dev] Re: [project leads] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-07 Thread Alexandro Colorado
I think this is an important move and I support this motion. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:38 AM, eric.bacharderic.bach...@free.fr wrote: [please continue the discussion on the dev@openoffice.org mailing list] Hi all, Proposal : The OpenOffice.org Education Project proposes to drive the

[dev] Re: [marketing] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-07 Thread MÁTÉ Gergely
eric.bachard írta: Hi all, Proposal : The OpenOffice.org Education Project proposes to drive the following experimentation : - create a dedicated branch in the OOo source code repository (means hosted by OOo Project) for a 7-12 years software, derivated from OpenOffice.org, and made and

[dev] Re: [marketing] Re: [dev] Proposal : OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-07 Thread Ian
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 12:12 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: - create a dedicated branch in the OOo source code repository (means hosted by OOo Project) for a 7-12 years software, derivated from OpenOffice.org, and made and maintained by OpenOffice.org project. I like and support this

[dev] Re: OOo4Kids as official part of OpenOffice.org Project

2009-08-07 Thread Horst Salzwedel
Hi Eric + all, congratulations for the great idea of doing an OOo version for education. Like MS Office, OOo has functionality aimed for offices and does not consider the requirements for education and learning. Learning is forming models in our heads and playing and manipulating them.

[dev] Re: Error building on cygwin: Missing nsIAbLDAPAttributeMap.h

2009-08-06 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
T. J. Frazier tjfrazier at cfl.rr.com writes: My thought is to put the table itself at the top (with a brief introduction), and let all the explanations follow, with no other external links. From our point of view, it makes maintenance easier and more reliable. For the users, the table is

Re: [dev] Re: What is a SLOT and What is a WHICH?

2009-08-06 Thread Zhu Lihua
Hi, Thank you, Joost, Niklas and Bjoern. It's still abit abstract for me. I know SlotIDs are constants defined in .hrc files, e.g., sc.hrc. What about WhichIDs? Could you please give me a simple example to illustrate the relationship between module, item, whichId and SlotId? From Niklas'

[dev] Re: What is a SLOT and What is a WHICH?

2009-08-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Zhu Lihua zhulihua at redoffice.com writes: Hi all, I read the following code in OOo source code(itempool.hxx): #define SFX_WHICH_MAX 4999 static intIsWhich(USHORT nId) { return nId nId = SFX_WHICH_MAX; } static intIsSlot(USHORT nId) {

[dev] Re: Error building on cygwin: Missing nsIAbLDAPAttributeMap.h

2009-08-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Stephan Bergmann Stephan.Bergmann at Sun.COM writes: (Put Björn on cc, who might like to clarify in the guide which zips to download for which source revision.) Done: Put the link for current milestones in the Building Guide, and added the older links on the page about building older

Re: [dev] Re: Error building on cygwin: Missing nsIAbLDAPAttributeMap.h

2009-08-05 Thread T. J. Frazier
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Stephan Bergmann Stephan.Bergmann at Sun.COM writes: (Put Björn on cc, who might like to clarify in the guide which zips to download for which source revision.) Done: Put the link for current milestones in the Building Guide, and added the older links on the page about

[dev] Re: Error building on cygwin: Missing nsIAbLDAPAttributeMap.h

2009-08-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
T. J. Frazier tjfrazier at cfl.rr.com writes: Did you miss the second link, down in the adding required files to the build tree section? Yes. Fixed now. I'd have fixed this myself, but do we want a better solution, with the link in only one place? I would prefer a link in one place too, but

[dev] Re: Error building on cygwin: Missing nsIAbLDAPAttributeMap.h

2009-08-05 Thread T. J. Frazier
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: T. J. Frazier tjfrazier at cfl.rr.com writes: I'd have fixed this myself, but do we want a better solution, with the link in only one place? I would prefer a link in one place too, but the links are sensible in both locations, I think (I would like to have the needed

[dev] Re: OpenGrok - now it's possible to sort results by path

2009-08-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi again, On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Christian Lohmaiercl...@openoffice.org wrote: (cc d...@ooo, but please f'up2 d...@tools.openoffice.org only) now it is possible to let opengrok sort the search results by path in addition to the relevancy and last modified date sortings. ..well, not

[dev] Re: Contributing

2009-08-04 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Jeff Beauman jebeauman at charter.net writes: I've been writing mid-range code since 1983. For the past two years I've taken classes in C++, SQL, Game Programming, Assembler, and Visual Basic. In fact, I got my AAS this spring. I'm not sure how much help I can be to OO but I'm willing to

Re: [dev] Re: Building CWS odff06 with debug

2009-07-28 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi all, Michael Stahl schrieb: Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Regina, On Sunday, 2009-07-26 21:15:15 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: dbgoutsw.cxx c:/odff06debug/solver/300/wntmsci12.pro/bin/makedepend @C:/cygwin/tmp/mkosWuQI ../../../wntmsci12.pro/misc/s_drviewsa.dpcc

[dev] Re: Building CWS odff06 with debug

2009-07-28 Thread Michael Stahl
Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, I have added SW_DLLPUBLIC in dbgoutsw.hxx. Then I have build it with --enable-dbgutil and left out --enable-debug as Eike told me. That build finished. I installed it and started it. Next step I did (analog to Eike's mail) cd sw build killobj build

Re: [dev] Re: Building CWS odff06 with debug

2009-07-28 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Michael, Michael Stahl schrieb: i've just asked Oliver, and he said it's probably a bug, and you should file an issue (assign it to od). http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103860 kind regards Regina - To

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Please read: DSCMs, Mercurial Pilot and Performance

2009-07-27 Thread Guido Ostkamp
Hi Heiner, Developers, please: if you make big changes like this, use svn move or it's equivalent to move the files, regardless if it's in SVN or later in a DSCM. We don't want to have hundred's of megabytes dead weights in a repository which every one needs to copy/clone many times.A I

[dev] Re: Building CWS odff06 with debug

2009-07-27 Thread Michael Stahl
Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Regina, On Sunday, 2009-07-26 21:15:15 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: dbgoutsw.cxx c:/odff06debug/solver/300/wntmsci12.pro/bin/makedepend @C:/cygwin/tmp/mkosWuQI ../../../wntmsci12.pro/misc/s_drviewsa.dpcc c:/odff06debug/sw/source/core/doc/dbgoutsw.cxx(998) : error

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-25 Thread T. J. Frazier
Hi, Per, Per Eriksson wrote: Hi all, Thanks a lot for working on this. You've done a tremendously good job with the instructions. Bjoern, thanks a lot for all the hard work. Is it possible to get the Anno 2009 style on the TOC header as in the DevGuide? ;-) Actually, Clayton did all the

[dev] Re: build into installation

2009-07-24 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Terrence Miller terrencem at sbcglobal.net writes: I just completed my first build (8 hours on a Toshiba laptop) ( configure args and packages added documented in attached script). I followed the directions from the wiki page and added: export LOCALINSTALLDIR=/home/tcm/dest/second_try

Re: [dev] Re: Build Comments

2009-07-23 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Ok, I will remove the references from to gpc from the Building Guide for current releases. However, the directory external/gpc needs to be removed and configure needs to get rid of related options. Is there a bug for this already or do I need to open a new one?

[dev] Re: Build Comments

2009-07-22 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Thorsten Behrens thb at openoffice.org writes: all distros I know of are using the non-gpc clipper since ages, I'm not aware of any regressions there. Also, if my memory does not fail me, Hamburg switched to non-gpc for 3.0, at least I don't find any traces of WITH_GPC in solenv anymore. Ok,

Re: [dev]Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-22 Thread T. J. Frazier
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: T. J. Frazier tjfrazier at cfl.rr.com writes: Okay, guys, TOC template time,... Please go ahead, I am not really that skilled with wiki stuff. From what I read on transclusion when you mentioned it, it seems to be the right tool for the job. done -- /tj/

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving from Mozilla to SeaMonkey

2009-07-22 Thread Maho NAKATA
From: eric b eric.bach...@free.fr Subject: [dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving from Mozilla to SeaMonkey Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:59:13 +0200 More precisely, this cws is born from a task proposed and managed by the Education Project. Pierre Pasteau, student at Epitech Paris, worked hard to achieve

[dev] Re: [qa-dev] Proposal : Recheck of verified issues isn't mandatory anymore

2009-07-21 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi, the proposal was approved yesterday in the Release Status Meeting. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ReleaseStatus_Minutes#2009-07-20 After the meeting I started the queries and closed 916 fixed/verified issues. - 12 issues without a target ('-') - 15 issues with target 'DevTools'

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Bjoern, On Monday, 2009-07-20 12:33:48 +, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: I would further suggest to strip the Development hierarchy and make Building_Guide the top level hierarchy, so that would be http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_Guide How about putting it in the

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-21 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi, Eike Rathke skrev: Hi Bjoern, On Monday, 2009-07-20 12:33:48 +, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: I would further suggest to strip the Development hierarchy and make Building_Guide the top level hierarchy, so that would be http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_Guide

[dev] Re: Build Comments

2009-07-21 Thread Michael Stahl
Terrence Miller wrote: If OOo wants to be able to reproduce builds, we will need to have a local snapshot of any package listed as a build requirement. The idea is that QA person should be be able to take a blank machine, a Linux install CD, and a CD containning a milestone and after

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Per Eriksson pereriksson at openoffice.org writes: I agree that striping OpenOffice.org and moving to documentation is a good idea. Bjoern feel free to do it. done. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org

Re: [dev]Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-21 Thread T. J. Frazier
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Per Eriksson pereriksson at openoffice.org writes: I agree that striping OpenOffice.org and moving to documentation is a good idea. Bjoern feel free to do it. done. Okay, guys, TOC template time, or transclusion time, to get rid of all that redirect trash at the top

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
T. J. Frazier tjfrazier at cfl.rr.com writes: done. Okay, guys, TOC template time, or transclusion time, to get rid of all that redirect trash at the top of every referenced page. Ugh, true. The TOC has to be changed on every BG page. Is anybody else volunteering, or shall I do

Re: [dev] Re: oopm: current project status

2009-07-20 Thread Elizabeth Matthis
Hi Carsten, I think it is great that you are trying to move the OOPM project ahead. Just to get teh whole picture, I read the wiki page on which it says: . Right now the work on the requirements specification for a prototype has started (issue 57601

[dev] Re: Build Comments

2009-07-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Terrence Miller terrencem at sbcglobal.net writes: I am about half way through my first build Hi Terrence, thank you for taking the time to report back. and have already run into things which could lead to unstable Linux builds: My experience has convinced me that any source information

[dev] Re: Build Comments

2009-07-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Terrence Miller terrencem at sbcglobal.net writes: In current scheme you end up running configure once for each missing package (since it stops on first error). Sometimes the error message is useful but not always. I understand the problem, but unfortunately maintaining an up-to-date complete

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-19 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Per Eriksson pereriksson at openoffice.org writes: Christian had a good point regarding simple instructions previously. As you mentioned, the instructions are similar. There are big possibilities that we want to add platform-specific notes, comments, references to other documentation (e.g.

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-19 Thread T. J. Frazier
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Per Eriksson pereriksson at openoffice.org writes: Christian had a good point regarding simple instructions previously. As you mentioned, the instructions are similar. There are big possibilities that we want to add platform-specific notes, comments, references to

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-18 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi, Just as a side note, look what Mozilla has done. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Build_Documentation They have had this for some time, and I belive we can extract ideas from it. I'm glad that we are moving in the same direction. Per

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-18 Thread Oliver Specht
Tor Lillqvist schrieb: I don't know if there is a guide. I figured it out myself, it isn't really that hard. - build the parts of OOo you are interested in debugging with debug=true, and copy the resulting DLLs into their place in the OOo installation - start OOo from Explorer, just as when

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-18 Thread Marcin Miłkowski
Oliver Specht pisze: Tor Lillqvist schrieb: I don't know if there is a guide. I figured it out myself, it isn't really that hard. - build the parts of OOo you are interested in debugging with debug=true, and copy the resulting DLLs into their place in the OOo installation - start OOo from

[dev] Re: oopm: current project status

2009-07-18 Thread Carsten Klein
Now, since I got no reply from the OOPM project lead, I wonder where I would have to apply for actually getting a developer's role on that project? Is there someone here, who is so kind as to point me into the right direction, since the online help on the OOo project pages are not actually

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-18 Thread Carsten Klein
Per Eriksson schrieb: Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen skrev: I did quite some cleanup in Building on Linux. However, I noted that there are large parts in it that are platform-independant. I am suggesting to add a section Building before the Building on ... sections and consolidating all

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Tor Lillqvist
2. Is OOo completely buildable on Visual Studio 2008 or do we still need this note? It sounds as if you might be confusing Visual Studio the IDE with Visual Studio the product (which includes a C and C++ compiler and an IDE, and various other stuff, depending on edition) here. OOo is not

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi, William S Fulton skrev: I built early dev versions of 3.0 with Visual Studio 2008 (paid for version), but it did not build with Visual Studio 2008 Express (free version) for the reasons stated above. I suspect the situation is still the same as the problem is with missing compiler/sdk

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Per Eriksson pereriksson at openoffice.org writes: Here is how far I've come so far. Several pages' content have now been moved to these 7 pages: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Development/OpenOffice.org_Building_Guide Hi Per, I did quite some cleanup in Building on Linux.

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Takashi Ono
Hi Per, In message Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community, Per Eriksson wrote... 1. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Windows#MinGW It says MinGW is not supported, but there are a number of referenced issues which have been integrated. What is the current

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi, Takashi Ono skrev: Although MinGW build is completed with a couple of milestones, as a developper for mingw port, I think the following description is appropriate for the time being. MinGW is not recommended for building OpenOffice.org at the moment. The build with MinGW is still

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen skrev: I did quite some cleanup in Building on Linux. However, I noted that there are large parts in it that are platform-independant. I am suggesting to add a section Building before the Building on ... sections and consolidating all platform-independant stuff

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Tor, Tor Lillqvist schrieb: 2. Is OOo completely buildable on Visual Studio 2008 or do we still need this note? It sounds as if you might be confusing Visual Studio the IDE with Visual Studio the product (which includes a C and C++ compiler and an IDE, and various other stuff, depending on

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-17 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I like to learn more about debugging OOo with the VS IDE. Can you point me to a guide or provide a guide in the Wiki? I don't know if there is a guide. I figured it out myself, it isn't really that hard. - build the parts of OOo you are interested in debugging with debug=true, and copy the

[dev] Re: [documentation-dev] Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Per, IMO this is a great and valuable job. A very big + from my side :-) Cor Per Eriksson wrote (15-7-2009 11:09) Hello, I am cross-posting this to dev and documentation, but think that best would be if discussions run on dev, as many of the details probably will be discussed there.

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Christian Lohmaier cloph at openoffice.org writes: My problem is that everyone is eager to start new projects, new efforts instead of improviing what is there already. Cleaning up the docs _is_ improving what is already there. My problem is that if you really feel the need of simplifying the

[dev] Re: Interested in helping with development

2009-07-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Terrence Miller terrencem at sbcglobal.net writes: To avoid going crazy with nothing to do I would like to become involved with Open Office. Low level C++ issues such as exception handling is the area I know the most about. I have access to systems running Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux. Hi

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Per Eriksson pereriksson at openoffice.org writes: Thanks for all the kind words. I have created the guide here: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Development/OpenOffice.org_Building_Guide And these are the page created so far: OpenOffice.org_Building_Guide

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi, Bjoern Michaelsen skrev: great stuff, but can you make the source wiki pages from which the info in the Building Guide is collected #REDIRECT to the development guide? That would help weed out old and rotting duplicate content. I did that already with the Getting the source page (and also

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi, I am looking at the instructions for Windows and is having the following thoughts: 1. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Windows#MinGW It says MinGW is not supported, but there are a number of referenced issues which have been integrated. What is the current status of using MinGW?

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread Marcin Miłkowski
Per Eriksson pisze: 2. Is OOo completely buildable on Visual Studio 2008 or do we still need this note? Currently OOo isn't completely buildable with Visual Studio 2008 Express and Windows Server 2008 SDK due to missing ATL header / libs (these used to be shipped with the 2003 SDK, but the

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread Per Eriksson
Hi, Marcin Miłkowski skrev: Per Eriksson pisze: 2. Is OOo completely buildable on Visual Studio 2008 or do we still need this note? Currently OOo isn't completely buildable with Visual Studio 2008 Express and Windows Server 2008 SDK due to missing ATL header / libs (these used to be shipped

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-16 Thread William S Fulton
Per Eriksson wrote: 2. Is OOo completely buildable on Visual Studio 2008 or do we still need this note? Currently OOo isn't completely buildable with Visual Studio 2008 Express and Windows Server 2008 SDK due to missing ATL header / libs (these used to be shipped with the 2003 SDK, but the 2003

[dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-15 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Per Eriksson pereriksson at openoffice.org writes: If you think this is a good idea, I will start a new small effort for this in the wiki. I think it is a very good idea. When restructuring the information about building, we should take care to distill the happy path

Re: [dev] Re: Consolidating build instructions for the community

2009-07-15 Thread Per Eriksson
Hello Bjoern and Juergen, Bjoern Michaelsen skrev: I think it is a very good idea. When restructuring the information about building, we should take care to distill the happy path (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_path) from all the special cases (Tips and Tricks etc.) and get rid of obsolete

[dev] Re: OpenOffice conversion exception - Linux segmentation fault

2009-07-09 Thread Michael Stahl
hi Kermit, Kermit Qiu wrote: Hi, Now I use OpenOffice to convert document from pdf format into html format, and I try to cath all the exception as below: ... *try{* * ooStore-storeToURL( OUString::createFromAscii(strOOPathFile), storeProps ); }catch(...) // catch all the exception

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving from Mozilla to SeaMonkey

2009-07-02 Thread eric.bachard
Hi, Maho NAKATA a écrit : From: eric b eric.bach...@free.fr More precisely, this cws is born from a task proposed and managed by the Education Project. Pierre Pasteau, student at Epitech Paris, worked hard to achieve his part for OpenOffice.org, and Frank was the profesionnal helping us.

[dev] Re: Aktualisierte deutsche Wörterbücher - frami (2009-07-01)

2009-07-02 Thread Eberhard Roloff
Karl Zeiler wrote: Hallo, die deutschen Wörterbücher von Franz Michael Baumann (frami) sind aktualisert worden. Sie stehen ab sofort in allen drei deutschen Lokalisierungen zum Download bereit (Version: 2009-07-01): http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/dict-de_DE_frami

[dev] Re: DEV300_m51: building external dependencies seems to be broken

2009-07-01 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Wednesday 01 July 2009, 12:14, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: As you see, it fails when trying to build, after patching and configuring, trying to create a dir. ./unxlngi6/misc/build/BeanShell//mnt/build ./unxlngi6/misc/build/cppunit-1.8.0//mnt/build the /mnt/build appended at the end is

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving from Mozilla to SeaMonkey

2009-06-30 Thread Maho NAKATA
From: eric b eric.bach...@free.fr Subject: Re: [tools-dev] Moving from Mozilla to SeaMonkey Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:59:13 +0200 This cws is close to integration (Approved by QA), and it would be great to wait for the integration is done, and then create an additionnal FreeBSD cws afterwards.

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving from Mozilla to SeaMonkey

2009-06-27 Thread Maho NAKATA
Hi, From: Frank Schönheit frank.schoenh...@sun.com Subject: [tools-dev] Moving from Mozilla to SeaMonkey Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:12:29 +0200 If you maintain a buildbot, please also ensure to upgrade the pre-builts. I found seamonkey 1.1.4 tar ball here

[dev] Re: Developing a tool to recognise MS Office file types ( .doc, .xls, .mdb, .ppt )

2009-06-25 Thread Professional
The files should not be recognised based on the extension but contents of the file. On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Professional imagine2...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Sir/Madam, I am supposed to develop a tool which can identify the correct Microsoft Office File types (.doc, .xls,

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-24 Thread Mathias Bauer
Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:48 +0200, Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: Hi Eike, Eike Rathke wrote: I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? MBA had the idea

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-23 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:48 +0200, Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: Hi Eike, Eike Rathke wrote: I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? MBA had the idea to move also all resource

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-23 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Ivo, I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? MBA had the idea to move also all resource source files into a own module but we first need to discuss this a bit further

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-23 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:48 +0200, Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: Hi Eike, Eike Rathke wrote: I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? MBA had the idea to move also

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-23 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb: Hi Ivo, I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? MBA had the idea to move also all resource source files into a own module

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-23 Thread Mathias Bauer
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Ivo, I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? MBA had the idea to move also all resource source files into a own module

[dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi Eike, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Ivo, I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? Ivo and others are working on it to realize it in the near future ;-)

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: Ivo and others are working on it to realize it in the near future ;-) http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fl10nframework01 How is that helpful? #build the l10n tools cd transex3 build --all deliver cd xmlhelp build --all deliver cd

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
the DEV300 m51 milestones contains the cws l10ncleanup04 that moves all the translations that are spread over the office code to the new module l10n. Hey, wow, finally, well done! :-) Good news; not only for translators, but also for developers because now a recursive grep for some

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi Rene, the goal to to build and deliver language packs without any dependencies. This CWS is the first step. There are still some steps open. But as I heard by Ivo, when this CWs is ready you can you can build the localization without any obj's / libs / whatever. But the source code is still

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: the goal to to build and deliver language packs without any dependencies. This CWS is the first step. There are still some steps open. But as I heard by Ivo, when this CWs is ready you can you can build the localization without any obj's / libs / whatever. But the

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi Eike, Eike Rathke wrote: I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the far future? MBA had the idea to move also all resource source files into a own module but we first need to discuss this

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi Rene, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: the goal to to build and deliver language packs without any dependencies. This CWS is the first step. There are still some steps open. But as I heard by Ivo, when this CWs is ready you can you can build the localization without any

[dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-20 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Ivo, On Thursday, 2009-06-18 15:29:29 +0200, Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: the DEV300 m51 milestones contains the cws l10ncleanup04 that moves all the translations that are spread over the office code to the new module l10n. Hey, wow, finally, well done! :-) Good news; not only for translators,

Re: [dev] Re: [discuss] using OpenOpt (numerical optimization) from OpenOffice Calc

2009-05-27 Thread Mathias Bauer
Alexandro Colorado wrote: woukd be great but we need to upddate python within OOo. is an ongoing task. On 5/1/09, JKR j...@mail333.com wrote: Hello list, is it possible to connect Python-written numerical optimization framework OpenOpt (http://openopt.org) to OOo Calc? I guess especially

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >