What the ** is google’s OpenStreetMap program?
Fwd: @google #openstreetmap #osm WTF: google’s OpenStreetMap program
(sic) http://ping.fm/219EB (via http://ff.im/7ZIL7)
http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/09/monopoly-city-streets/
When Monopoly City Streets is working properly, it’s pretty
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
What the ** is google’s OpenStreetMap program?
Fwd: @google #openstreetmap #osm WTF: google’s OpenStreetMap program
(sic) http://ping.fm/219EB (via http://ff.im/7ZIL7)
http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/09/monopoly-city-streets/
When Monopoly
Hi
I have an app (BT747) that can upload tracks directly to OSM using the 0.6
API.
Uploaded tracks are supposed to be private initially. This worked fine for
sure about 25 days ago, but no longer since apparently 2 weeks.
I did not change my program and everything seems ok on that side (public
Hi
I have an app (BT747) that can upload tracks directly to OSM using the 0.6
API.
Uploaded tracks are supposed to be private initially. This worked fine for
sure about 25 days ago, but no longer since apparently 2 weeks.
I did not change my program and everything seems ok on that side (public
On 12/09/09 16:30, le_top wrote:
Uploaded tracks are supposed to be private initially. This worked fine for
sure about 25 days ago, but no longer since apparently 2 weeks.
I did not change my program and everything seems ok on that side (public is
set to 0) - I guess something changed on the
Hi
I just tested it again - the track is still public - I also deleted the
track so you can't see it in the list.
I went to the API documentation again too, but that seems to have changed
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6#Uploading_Traces)
since my last visit there in
On 12/09/09 17:01, le_top wrote:
I think it would be best to provide some backward compatibility for the
'public' parameter - the API version did not change so that would be
logical.
As I explained, there is backwards compatibility code. There is
obviously a problem with it, but it does
On 12/09/09 17:23, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 12/09/09 17:01, le_top wrote:
I think it would be best to provide some backward compatibility for the
'public' parameter - the API version did not change so that would be
logical.
As I explained, there is backwards compatibility code. There is
2009/9/12 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/09/monopoly-city-streets/
When Monopoly City Streets is working properly, it’s pretty nifty.
Players start with three million smackers in the bank. They can use
that cash to buy
Hi Tom
Following your update, I just tested and a newly updated track was indeed
private now - so there's your 'second opinion'.
Thanks.
I'll soon be testing my updated app too (using visibility).
Mario
Tom Hughes-2 wrote:
On 12/09/09 17:23, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 12/09/09 17:01, le_top
I've been hacking on the JOSM validator plugin for a while. One of the
repeating hard problems that comes up are doing the UnconnectedWays tests.
You need to do searches for every segment in a way to see if there are any
nearby nodes. This generally means that you do a number of searches on the
QuadBuckets also happen to implement CollectionNode. So, we can
just plug it in for Collection like in the DataSet class.
---
core-dave/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/data/osm/DataSet.java |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN
Dave Hansen writes:
So, I went and implemented it. I call it QuadBuckets, and it's basically an
unbalanced 4-way radix tree structure.
Well done, Dave!
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241
On Saturday 12 September 2009, Dave Hansen wrote:
I've been hacking on the JOSM validator plugin for a while. One of the
repeating hard problems that comes up are doing the UnconnectedWays tests.
You need to do searches for every segment in a way to see if there are any
nearby nodes. This
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 17:58 +0100, Robert Scott wrote:
On Saturday 12 September 2009, Dave Hansen wrote:
I've been hacking on the JOSM validator plugin for a while. One of the
repeating hard problems that comes up are doing the UnconnectedWays tests.
You need to do searches for every
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
If someone knows of any existing Java kd-tree implementations, I'd be
happy to look into it and see if it could be applied here. I love
nothing more than to throw my own code away. Seriously. ;)
Google turned this up for
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 17:25 +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
If someone knows of any existing Java kd-tree implementations, I'd be
happy to look into it and see if it could be applied here. I love
nothing more than to
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 17:25 +, Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
If someone knows of any existing Java kd-tree implementations, I'd be
happy to look into it
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 21:04 +0200, Petr Nejedlý wrote:
Dave Hansen napsal(a):
Ooh, I forgot about josm-ng. That one looks very usable. If mine
doesn't pan out, I'll certainly look at that one.
Well, the QTree in josm-ng is similar to yours in the way it distributes
the content,
Just recently, Node/Way/Relation require access to be via accessor
functions. That should help out quite a bit.
The one thing that we do need is for a list of PrimitiveChangeListeners or
something to call when primitives do change.
This is the very motivation Jiri and myself have been working
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Karl Guggisberg wrote:
Just recently, Node/Way/Relation require access to be via accessor
functions. That should help out quite a bit. The one thing that we do
need is for a list of PrimitiveChangeListeners or something to call
when primitives do change.
This is the
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 21:36 +0200, Karl Guggisberg wrote:
Just recently, Node/Way/Relation require access to be via accessor
functions. That should help out quite a bit.
The one thing that we do need is for a list of PrimitiveChangeListeners or
something to call when primitives do change.
22 matches
Mail list logo
