Re: [OSM-dev] Blank Tiles at z23 and Deeper

2012-10-09 Thread jpk
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 00:21:25 -0400 > jpk <_...@jpk.is> wrote: >> In any case, I set up my tile server for >> this purpose. I changed the #define MAX_ZOOM to 30 in mod_tile's >> render_config.h, and set MAXZOOM in renderd.conf to 30.

[OSM-dev] Blank Tiles at z23 and Deeper

2012-10-09 Thread jpk
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:40 AM, pavithran wrote: > 19 and 20 itself were tricky for me , Wonder how you fared at levels > above them :) > > And yeah you need to redesign everything from scratch after 19 as the > colours,lines or textures are too big and look bad . > > Do you have a screenshot so t

[OSM-dev] Blank Tiles at z23 and Deeper

2012-10-09 Thread jpk
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:21 PM, jpk <_...@jpk.is> wrote: >> All tiles at z23 and greater are solid green-ish (#b5d0d0, to be >> exact). Poking through the mapnik style, I see this color is used as >> the background color for the Map el

[OSM-dev] how to debug rendering issue

2012-10-09 Thread Stephan Knauss
Hi, I have a strange rendering issue on my server. This highway is not rendered: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/177905977 The other oneway highway next to it is rendered: http://tile.osm-tools.org/osm_then/18/203537/124374.png On osm.org both ways are rendered: http://tile.openstreetm

Re: [OSM-dev] Blank Tiles at z23 and Deeper

2012-10-09 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:21 PM, jpk <_...@jpk.is> wrote: > All tiles at z23 and greater are solid green-ish (#b5d0d0, to be > exact). Poking through the mapnik style, I see this color is used as > the background color for the Map element (osm.xml, line 6). Changing > that color changes the color

Re: [OSM-dev] Will the real OpenStreetBugs stand up?

2012-10-09 Thread Kai Krueger
On 10/09/2012 02:31 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 09/10/12 21:24, Tom MacWright wrote: All those are independent third party sites created by individuals and are not directly related to core site. Aren't they using the same database somehow? No idea. What we were talking about in th

Re: [OSM-dev] Will the real OpenStreetBugs stand up?

2012-10-09 Thread Matt Amos
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Mikel Maron wrote: >> What part of "I will take an action to get something pushed out before the >> next meeting" did you fail to understand yesterday? > > This sounds promising, but I fail to understand it fully. Is there someone > else from the EWG meeting (not To

Re: [OSM-dev] Will the real OpenStreetBugs stand up?

2012-10-09 Thread Mikel Maron
> What part of "I will take an action to get something pushed out before the >next meeting" did you fail to understand yesterday? This sounds promising, but I fail to understand it fully. Is there someone else from the EWG meeting (not TomH, who I don't want to bother) who would like to fill us

Re: [OSM-dev] Will the real OpenStreetBugs stand up?

2012-10-09 Thread Tom Hughes
On 09/10/12 21:24, Tom MacWright wrote: All those are independent third party sites created by individuals and are not directly related to core site. Aren't they using the same database somehow? No idea. What we were talking about in the EWG meeting was adding a "bug" report

Re: [OSM-dev] Will the real OpenStreetBugs stand up?

2012-10-09 Thread Tom MacWright
> > All those are independent third party sites created by individuals and are > not directly related to core site. Aren't they using the same database somehow? > What we were talking about in the EWG meeting was adding a "bug" reporting > system to the main site that records things in the main

Re: [OSM-dev] Will the real OpenStreetBugs stand up?

2012-10-09 Thread Tom Hughes
On 09/10/12 21:01, Alex Barth wrote: I'm trying to understand the status of OpenStreetBugs and where development is happening. I think you are confusing two (or more) completely different things. I was trying to follow along at the EWG meeting yesterday. Parsing through the wiki [1] now I

[OSM-dev] Will the real OpenStreetBugs stand up?

2012-10-09 Thread Alex Barth
I'm trying to understand the status of OpenStreetBugs and where development is happening. I was trying to follow along at the EWG meeting yesterday. Parsing through the wiki [1] now I remain confused. Here are my questions: - Why are there two sites: osmbugs.org and http://openstreetbugs.schok

Re: [OSM-dev] OWL + OSM Activity Server

2012-10-09 Thread Matt Amos
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Paweł Paprota wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Thanks for the response. What you wrote about partitioning the data etc. > is exactly what concerns me with the Changeset Activity Publisher > implementation - it will get too big with time. what Ian says is exactly right - the cu

Re: [Potlatch-dev] [OpenStreetMap] #4615: Grammar pedantry: "show less" should arguably be "show fewer" in the toolbox

2012-10-09 Thread OpenStreetMap
#4615: Grammar pedantry: "show less" should arguably be "show fewer" in the toolbox --+ Reporter: SomeoneElse | Owner: potlatch-dev@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: trivial | Milestone: Component: potl

Re: [OSM-dev] Blank Tiles at z23 and Deeper

2012-10-09 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 00:21:25 -0400 jpk <_...@jpk.is> wrote: > In any case, I set up my tile server for > this purpose. I changed the #define MAX_ZOOM to 30 in mod_tile's > render_config.h, and set MAXZOOM in renderd.conf to 30. That's enough > to get the tile server to serve tiles down to z30

[OSM-dev] 1,074,201 things to do for OpenStreetMap, literally

2012-10-09 Thread Dennis Luxen
Fellow OpenStreetMappers, Team OSRM is happy to announce a new data analysis feature for OpenStreetmap data based on OSRMs great routing capabilities. Over the past weeks, we at Team OSRM received a number of complaints that a certain part of the road network was not route-able and were asked for