On 03.12.14 17:14, Andy Allan wrote:
Thanks for the analysis, I hope it provides developers with ideas for
combatting it via the automated spam filters that we already have[1].
I'd suggest to extend/refine the automated filter somewhat. Say:
* a novice ist not allowed to post at all
* a novice
On 04/12/14 11:17, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 03.12.14 17:14, Andy Allan wrote:
Thanks for the analysis, I hope it provides developers with ideas for
combatting it via the automated spam filters that we already have[1].
I'd suggest to extend/refine the automated filter somewhat. Say:
* a
On 03/12/14 16:14, Andy Allan wrote:
However, spam is an arms race, and I think we might need a different
long-term approach. I know in the past using 3rd-party spam filtering
services was too expensive (and not really very OSM-ish either).
The main such system is akmiset and I'd love to use
On 04.12.14 12:33, Tom Hughes wrote:
So in other words, most of things we already factor in to our spam scoring...
We're just not quite as rigid.
A (hidden) spam score is bad (IMO). Nobody sees it, almost nobody can test it.
A documented user level with documented rules would make much more
On 04/12/14 12:06, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 04.12.14 12:33, Tom Hughes wrote:
So in other words, most of things we already factor in to our spam scoring...
We're just not quite as rigid.
A (hidden) spam score is bad (IMO). Nobody sees it, almost nobody can test it.
Nothing is hidden:
5 matches
Mail list logo
