On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 19:37 Paul Norman via dev
wrote:
...
out. Mapbox GL styles are written in JSON and most of the tools
> overwrite any formatting. This means there's no way to add comments to
Have you investigated HJSON? See:
https://hjson.github.io/
The Raku language (https://raku.or
On Tuesday 26 May 2020, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote:
>
> Rasterization is a data generalization technique too.
No it isn't. Generalization is the most frequently abused term in
cartography. Calling ST_Simplify and way_area filtering on OSM
landcover polygon data generalization is a bit like cal
On 26/05/2020 13:26, Christoph Hormann wrote:
As Joseph has hinted when it comes to accurate rendering for precise
mapper feedback without unintentional incentives at the lower zoom
levels there are other options based on pre-rasterizing the data which
would still allow using the benefits of clie
On Tuesday 26 May 2020, Tom Hughes via dev wrote:
> More specifically what you are seeing is that it will let you zoom in
> beyond zoom 8 but you are seeing data that was simplified on the
> basis that it would be shown at zoom 8 where those artefacts would
> not be visible.
As said that is not qu
On 2020-05-26 10:59, Simon Poole wrote:
I think you are missing
"Only zoom 0 to 8 has been implemented so far. I started at zoom 0 and
am working my way down."
Oh zoom 8 is way further out than I was, my bad. The simplifications are
not visible at that zoomlevel.
Maarten
Simon
Am 26.05
More specifically what you are seeing is that it will let you zoom in
beyond zoom 8 but you are seeing data that was simplified on the basis
that it would be shown at zoom 8 where those artefacts would not be
visible.
Tom
On 26/05/2020 09:59, Simon Poole wrote:
I think you are missing
"Only zo
I think you are missing
"Only zoom 0 to 8 has been implemented so far. I started at zoom 0 and
am working my way down."
Simon
Am 26.05.2020 um 10:42 schrieb Maarten Deen:
> On 2020-05-26 10:15, Paul Norman via dev wrote:
>> On 2020-05-25 1:15 a.m., Maarten Deen wrote:
>>> Still, it looks to be a
On 2020-05-26 10:15, Paul Norman via dev wrote:
On 2020-05-25 1:15 a.m., Maarten Deen wrote:
Still, it looks to be a very simplified subset of the complete data.
So I'd be interested to see how this works on a full dataset.
No, it has the full data except for admin boundaries and bay/straight
On 2020-05-25 1:15 a.m., Maarten Deen wrote:
Still, it looks to be a very simplified subset of the complete data.
So I'd be interested to see how this works on a full dataset.
No, it has the full data except for admin boundaries and bay/straight
names on zoom 7 and 8. When you compare it to Op
9 matches
Mail list logo
