On 04/12/14 12:06, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 04.12.14 12:33, Tom Hughes wrote:
So in other words, most of things we already factor in to our spam scoring...
We're just not quite as rigid.
A (hidden) spam score is bad (IMO). Nobody sees it, almost nobody can test it.
Nothing is hidden:
https:
On 04.12.14 12:33, Tom Hughes wrote:
> So in other words, most of things we already factor in to our spam scoring...
> We're just not quite as rigid.
A (hidden) spam score is bad (IMO). Nobody sees it, almost nobody can test it.
A documented "user level" with documented rules would make much more
On 03/12/14 16:14, Andy Allan wrote:
However, spam is an arms race, and I think we might need a different
long-term approach. I know in the past using 3rd-party spam filtering
services was too expensive (and not really very OSM-ish either).
The main such system is akmiset and I'd love to use i
On 04/12/14 11:17, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 03.12.14 17:14, Andy Allan wrote:
Thanks for the analysis, I hope it provides developers with ideas for
combatting it via the automated spam filters that we already have[1].
I'd suggest to extend/refine the automated filter somewhat. Say:
* a "novic
On 03.12.14 17:14, Andy Allan wrote:
> Thanks for the analysis, I hope it provides developers with ideas for
> combatting it via the automated spam filters that we already have[1].
I'd suggest to extend/refine the automated filter somewhat. Say:
* a "novice" ist not allowed to post at all
* a "no
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Antje <2...@minoa.li> wrote:
> There’s another suspicious post at
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Medyum%20Y%C4%B1lmaz%20Eren%20Hoca/diary/28134,
> which is Turkish.
>
> I personally prefer an increase in human blog moderators.
I agree. It's usually pretty obv
There’s another suspicious post at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Medyum%20Y%C4%B1lmaz%20Eren%20Hoca/diary/28134,
which is Turkish.
I personally prefer an increase in human blog moderators.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.op
On 3 December 2014 at 16:33, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> First, right now there's only a single person who can remove spam from
> diary entries or profiles.
Not strictly true - any user with site administrator priviledges can
remove spam - see my previous link to the code. There are multiple
peopl
On 03/12/14 16:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
maybe we could have a crowd-sourced approach and introduce a "spam"-flag
that logged-in users could set, i.e. another button in the "comment",
"reply" line which says something like "flag as spam", with a counter,
and if more than x people have click
I think the solution to this is actually pretty simple and straightforward.
First, right now there's only a single person who can remove spam from
diary entries or profiles.
Allowing other people (such as existing site moderators) to address
this would go a long way.
Second of all, we need a fla
On 3 December 2014 at 16:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> maybe we could have a crowd-sourced approach and introduce a "spam"-flag
> that logged-in users could set, i.e. another button in the "comment",
> "reply" line which says something like "flag as spam", with a counter, and
> if more than x
2014-12-03 17:14 GMT+01:00 Andy Allan :
> Thanks for the analysis, I hope it provides developers with ideas for
> combatting it via the automated spam filters that we already have[1].
>
> However, spam is an arms race, and I think we might need a different
> long-term approach. I know in the past
On 3 December 2014 at 15:46, Andrew Hain wrote:
> A spammer is periodically posting messages in Chinese to the User Diaries.
Thanks for the analysis, I hope it provides developers with ideas for
combatting it via the automated spam filters that we already have[1].
However, spam is an arms race,
A spammer is periodically posting messages in Chinese to the User Diaries.
These diaries follow a distinct pattern:
1. Reading machine translations, the messages advertise a variety of
products and services that are against the law. This may be to attract
people who would be reluctant to contact t
14 matches
Mail list logo
