Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovn: Add software l2 gateway.

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:58:28AM -0700, Russell Bryant wrote: > This patch implements one approach to using ovn-controller to implement > a software l2 gateway between logical and physical networks. > > A new logical port type called "gateway" is introduced here. It is very > close to how

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ovn-controller: Warn if system-id is missing.

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:39:32AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > If 'system-id' is missing from the Open_vSwitch database, ovn-controller > will not work. Log a warning if that happens to make it clear that > configuration is incomplete. > > Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant > ---

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ofproto-dpif: Do not count resubmit to later tables against limit.

Open vSwitch must ensure that flow translation takes a finite amount of time. Until now it has implemented this by limiting the depth of recursion. The initial limit, in version 1.0.1, was no recursion at all, and then over the years it has increased to 8 levels, then 16, then 32, and 64 for the

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ofproto-dpif: Rename "recurse" to "indentation".

The "recurse" member of struct xlate_in and struct xlate_ctx is used for two purposes: to determine the amount of indentation in "ofproto/trace" output and to limit the depth of recursion. An upcoming commit will separate these tasks, and so in preparation this commit renames "recurse" to

[ovs-dev] ovs + dpdk vhost-user match flows but cannot execute actions

I want to test dpdk vhost-user port on ovs to follow https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2015/06/09/building-vhost-user-for-ovs-today-using-dpdk-200; I create ovs+dpdk environment followed INSTALL.DPDK.md; and create 2 VM2, try to ping each other but show me “Destination Host Unreachable”;

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] classifier: Avoid inserting duplicates to cmaps.

Staged lookup indices assumed that cmap is efficient fealing with duplicates. Duplicates are implemented as linked lists, however, causing removal of rules to become (O^2) and highly cache-inefficient with large number of duplicates. This was problematic especially when many rules shared the

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] classifier: Remove redundant index.

The test for figuring out if the last index had the same fields as the actual rules map as broken, resulting into keeping an unnecessary index around. Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme --- lib/classifier.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/4] classifier: Remove logging.

The only vlog line was a left over from debugging. Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme --- lib/classifier.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/classifier.c b/lib/classifier.c index 4861672..1fbaa0c 100644 --- a/lib/classifier.c +++ b/lib/classifier.c @@ -25,9

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] classifier: Remove rare optimization case.

This optimization applied when a staged lookup index would narrow down to a single rule, which happens sometimes is simple test cases, but presumably less often in more populated flow tables. The result of this optimization allowed a bit more general megaflows, but the bit patterns produced were

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 06/12] dpif-netdev: Wait an RCU grace period before freeing ports.

On 10/04/2016 12:23, "Ben Pfaff" wrote: >On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:12:59AM +, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: >> >> >> On 01/04/2016 09:52, "Jarno Rajahalme" wrote: >> >> > >> >> On Mar 30, 2016, at 8:08 PM, Daniele Di Proietto >> >>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ofp-actions: Add a new action to truncate a packet.

> On Apr 13, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:17:13PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:06:16PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: >>> On 13 April 2016 at 16:12, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:56:50PM

Re: [ovs-dev] Unable to hit group table entry

Packets are supposed to be processed by one of the buckets for a select type group with equal load sharing implemented. However, I am still not able to get the equal load sharing. Only one bucket got executed. The command of adding a select group with two buckets and the dump-groups result are

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

2016-04-13 9:21 GMT-07:00 Traynor, Kevin : > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Panu > Matilainen > > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:50 AM > > To: Weglicki, MichalX ;

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

Thanks for the patch, I have a couple of comments: DPDK 16.04 enables by default checksum offloads and TSO for vhostuser device. While this seem to work ok, there seem to be a few problems with this: * OVS in userspace assumes that a packet is stored using a single mbuf (it is not aware of

[ovs-dev] Returned mail: see transcript for details

Dear user of openvswitch.org, Your account was used to send a large amount of unsolicited commercial e-mail during this week. Obviously, your computer was compromised and now runs a trojaned proxy server. We recommend you to follow our instructions in order to keep your computer safe. Best

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ofp-actions: Add a new action to truncate a packet.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:17:13PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:06:16PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > > On 13 April 2016 at 16:12, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:56:50PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > > >> On 12 April 2016 at 21:13, Ben Pfaff

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ofp-actions: Add a new action to truncate a packet.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:06:16PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 13 April 2016 at 16:12, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:56:50PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > >> On 12 April 2016 at 21:13, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38:38AM

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ofp-actions: Add a new action to truncate a packet.

On 13 April 2016 at 16:12, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:56:50PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: >> On 12 April 2016 at 21:13, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38:38AM -0700, William Tu wrote: >> >> Should we expose "truncate" to the

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 RFC] ovn: Support native dhcp using'continuations'

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:08:00PM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote: > ​Even I was thinking to identify a minimal set of dhcp options and > support them. If the requirement arises for more dhcp options, we can > raise a bug. In order to support ​more dhcp options we just need to > define them in

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 RFC] ovn: Support native dhcp using 'continuations'

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:11:01PM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote: > To support native dhcp in ovn > - A new column 'dhcp-options' is added in 'Logical_Switch' north db. > - A logical flow is added for each logical port to handle dhcp packets >if the CMS has defined dhcp options in this column.

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ofp-actions: Add a new action to truncate a packet.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:56:50PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 12 April 2016 at 21:13, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38:38AM -0700, William Tu wrote: > >> Should we expose "truncate" to the ovs-ofctl action list? > >> > >> I was thinking about this ovs-ofctl

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-linux: Fix ingress policing burst rate configuration via tc

Thanks for working on this. The original patch, as opposed to the followup quoted below) doesn't seem to have made it to the mailing list archive or to patchwork. Can you resend it? On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:49:28PM +0200, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > I verified the 10% / 80% changes with

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: post event during vport delete

Acked-by: Sairam Venugopal On 4/13/16, 3:33 PM, "Nithin Raju" wrote: >Got left out during the previous round of refactoring. > >Signed-off-by: Nithin Raju >--- > datapath-windows/ovsext/Vport.c | 8 > 1 file changed, 8

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: post event during vport delete

Got left out during the previous round of refactoring. Signed-off-by: Nithin Raju --- datapath-windows/ovsext/Vport.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/datapath-windows/ovsext/Vport.c b/datapath-windows/ovsext/Vport.c index 4da2b42..882b41f 100644

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ofp-actions: Make ofpact_finish() harder to misuse.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:54:14AM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 12 April 2016 at 22:00, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > It's pretty easy to forget to update the pointer to an ofpact when > > finishing it. This commit forces the caller to pass a pointer-to-pointer > > instead, and uses that

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] datapath-windows: Add support for Connection Tracking in Hyper-V

This patch adds support for Connection Tracking in Hyper-V. The patch has been ported over from userspace implementation. The current version of the patch supports zone, mark and label fields for TCP traffic. Other protocols will be added in subsequent patches. Sairam Venugopal (1):

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] datapath-windows: Add Connection Tracking Support

Enable support for Stateful Firewall in Hyper-V by adding a Connection Tracking module. The module has been ported over from the userspace implementation patch of a similar name. The current version of the module supports ct - zone, mark and label for TCP packets. Support for other packet formats

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 RFC] ovn: Support native dhcp using 'continuations'

> +/* dhcp options */ > +shash_init(_opt_symtab); > +dhcp_opt_expr_symtab_add_field(_opt_symtab, "offerip", 0, > + DHCP_OPT_TYPE_IP4); > +dhcp_opt_expr_symtab_add_field(_opt_symtab, "netmask", 1, > +

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ofpbuf: Fix use-after-free in bundle parse.

It reminds me another similar issue: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-March/067313.html Is there some way to avoid or make it harder to forgetting to update the pointer once ofpbuf_put_uninit reallocate to newly allocated memory? Regards, William On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Ben

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC] ovn-controller: Optimize processing for non-local datapath without patch ports.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Guru Shetty wrote: > > > On 28 March 2016 at 00:10, Han Zhou wrote: > >> For non-local datapaths, if there are no patch ports attached, it >> means the lflows and port bindings would never be needed on the >> Chassis. Skipping

Re: [ovs-dev] [CudaMailTagged] Adding a field in the struct flow

On 13 April 2016 at 00:04, Amrane Ait Zeouay wrote: > Hi, > I want to add a field to the struct flow, and i checked the FAQ 'How do I > add support for a new field or header?' but i didn't understand it, what i > want to do is add a field in the flow and then when it will

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC] ovn-controller: Optimize processing for non-local datapath without patch ports.

On 28 March 2016 at 00:10, Han Zhou wrote: > For non-local datapaths, if there are no patch ports attached, it > means the lflows and port bindings would never be needed on the > Chassis. Skipping the processing for such lflows and port bindings > can save significant amount

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] Introduce OVSDB readme markdown

From: RYAN D. MOATS Provide a point to start collecting documentation on OVSDB and seed it with experiences from making use of change tracking. Signed-off-by: RYAN D. MOATS --- ovsdb/README.md | 38 ++ 1 files

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ofp-actions: Make ofpact_finish() harder to misuse.

On 12 April 2016 at 22:00, Ben Pfaff wrote: > It's pretty easy to forget to update the pointer to an ofpact when > finishing it. This commit forces the caller to pass a pointer-to-pointer > instead, and uses that to automatically update the pointer. There still > could be cases

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] system-traffic: Use better names for OVS vxlan ports.

On 12 April 2016 at 21:15, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:36:55AM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer >> --- >> tests/system-traffic.at | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ofp-actions: Add a new action to truncate a packet.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38:38AM -0700, William Tu wrote: >> Should we expose "truncate" to the ovs-ofctl action list? >> >> I was thinking about this ovs-ofctl syntax: >> actions='output(max_len=64, port=1), output:2' >> >>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] ofproto-dpif-xlate: Generate bitmasks in set_field.

On 12 April 2016 at 21:19, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:23:47PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: >> On 4 April 2016 at 14:56, Joe Stringer wrote: >> > Previously, whenever a set_field() action was executed, the entire field >> > would become masked and the

[ovs-dev] ipv6 tunneling support question for branch-2.5

Hi, We are researching with IPv6 tunneling support on openvswitch. We can only use a released version of openvswitch (not the experimental master branch). We saw that IPv6 tunnel creation fails in branch-2.5, which dates back to a commit and log suggests that there were some issues that could

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Panu Matilainen > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:50 AM > To: Weglicki, MichalX ; dev@openvswitch.org > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v11 2/8] util: Add a path canonicalizer

Hi Ben, I have rebased (due to conflicts) the series and am set to resubmit; however I'd like to get closure on this issue before I do. I have no strong feelings either way - I can manually scan the string for .. or use the realpath code I've put here. Since this only happens at initialization

Re: [ovs-dev] tunneling: Fix for concomitant IPv4 and IPv6 tunnels

> -Original Message- > From patchwork Fri Apr 1 13:06:05 2016 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: [ovs-dev] tunneling: Fix for concomitant IPv4 and IPv6 tunnels > From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

[ovs-dev] ovn: Issue in ACL stage when the dhcp reply packet is resumed

Hi, I am seeing an issue while testing the ovn native dhcp implementation. When the dhcp reply packet from ovn-controller is resumed by ovs-vswitchd, the packet is getting dropped in the egress pipeline - ACL stage. I see the below messages in the vswitchd.log --

[ovs-dev] Mail System Error - Returned Mail

This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] netdev-dpdk.c: Add ingress-policing functionality.

This patch provides the modifications required in netdev-dpdk.c and vswitch.xml to enable ingress policing for DPDK interfaces. This patch implements the necessary netdev functions to netdev-dpdk.c as well as various helper functions required for ingress policing. The vswitch.xml has been

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] netdev-dpdk.c: Add generic policer functions.

Add generic policer functions to avoid code duplication. Policing can be implemented on both egress and ingress paths. Currently the QoS egress-policer implementation uses it's own specific run and packet handle policer functions. This patch makes the policer functions generic so that they can be

[ovs-dev] Add ingress policer functionality to OVS with DPDK.

This patchset adds generic policer functions and ingress_policing functionality to OVS with DPDK. Patch 1 introduces generic policer functions to avoid code duplication when processing either ingress or egress traffic with a policer. Patch 2 adds ingress policing functionality and details to

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] tunneling: Improving tunneling performance using DPDK Rx checksum offloading feature.

Optimizing tunneling performance in userspace datapath by offloading the rx checksum validation on tunnel packets to the NIC when it is supported. This patch improves the bidirectional VxLAN tunneling performance by 8% and decapsulation performance by 24%. However it introduces 1% performance

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] tunneling: Improving VxLAN tunneling performance using DPDK Rx checksum offloading feature.

Hi Jesse, Thank you for looking into the patch. I will send out v2 patch after incorporating your comments. Regards _Sugesh > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Gross [mailto:je...@kernel.org] > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 5:33 PM > To: Chandran, Sugesh > Cc:

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] netdev-dpdk: add hotplug support

In order to use dpdk ports in ovs they have to be bound to a DPDK compatible driver before ovs is started. This patch adds the possibility to hotplug (or hot-unplug) a device after ovs has been started. The implementation adds an appctl command: netdev-dpdk/port-clt After the user attaches a new

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v14 1/6] More updates to ovn test output

Adding more detail that helps find what went wrong. Signed-off-by: Ryan Moats --- tests/ovn.at | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at index 22121e1..786479f 100644 --- a/tests/ovn.at +++ b/tests/ovn.at @@ -1177,14 +1177,17 @@

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v14 2/6] Change encaps_run to work incrementally

As a side effect, tunnel context is persisted. Signed-off-by: Ryan Moats --- ovn/controller/encaps.c | 162 ovn/controller/ovn-controller.c | 5 ++ 2 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) diff --git

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v14 3/6] Convert binding_run to incremental processing.

Ensure that the entire port binding table is processed when chassis are added/removed or when get_local_iface_ids finds new ports on the local vswitch. Side effects: - Persist local_datapaths and patch_datapaths across runs so that changes to either can be used as a trigger to reset

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v14 0/6] Incremental Processing

Prior versions of the patch set used change tracking incorrectly - this change set fixes that, but it results in larger patchsets, as persisting structures and adding incremental processing end up combined into the same patch. Specific processing steps havs been extracted into helper methods to

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v14 6/6] Add incremental proessing to lflow_run and physical_run

This code changes to allow incremental processing of the logical flow and physical binding tables whenver possible. Side Effects: - Make flow table persistent in ovn controller - Reset lflow processing when adding/removing patch ports Note: flows created by physical_run for multicast_groups

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v14 5/6] Persist ovn flow tables.

Ensure that ovn flow tables are persisted so that changes to them chan be applied incrementally - this is a prereq for making lflow_run and physical_run incremental. Signed-off-by: Ryan Moats --- ovn/controller/lflow.c | 26 ++-- ovn/controller/lflow.h |

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v14 4/6] Persist lport_index and mcgroup_index structures

This is preparatory to making physical_run and lflow_run process incrementally as changes to the data in these structures control that processing. Signed-off-by: Ryan Moats --- ovn/controller/lport.c | 216 +---

[ovs-dev] You can use it to make cash anytime you need it.

Good day! We considered your resume to be very attractive and we thought the vacant position in our company could be interesting for you. We cooperate with different countries and currently we have many clients in the world.Part-time and full-time employment are both currently important. We

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC] netdev-dpdk: Expand RSS hash calculation by MAC addresses

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Gross [mailto:je...@kernel.org] > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 7:57 PM > To: Wojciechowicz, RobertX > Cc: ovs dev > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC] netdev-dpdk: Expand RSS hash > calculation

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] debian: Exclude 'control' from .gitignore

Hi, On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:37:21 +0300, shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com wrote: > debian/control is git controlled, no reason for it to be in the git > ignore list. Please ignore; Seems debian/control gets over-written when building openvswitch-datapath-module using debian/rules.modules.

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-linux: Fix ingress policing burst rate configuration via tc

I verified the 10% / 80% changes with netperf, it's unable to sustain 10Mbps without at least a 8Mbit burst. I've seen recommendations from cisco to use policing bursts of around 150 to 200%, but I guess that depends on the path latency or even the implementation. My netperf tests were in-host.

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

On 04/13/2016 11:38 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 04/13/2016 11:33 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 04/13/2016 11:16 AM, Weglicki, MichalX wrote: -Original Message- From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmati...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:50 AM To: Weglicki, MichalX

[ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: ACL+dpcls for Wildcard matching.

The purpose of this implementation is to improve the performance of wildcard matching in user-space. This RFC patch shows the basic functionality, some aspects were not covered yet. I would like to get some feedback on whether people think integrating the DPDK ACL table in this manner is

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

Following changes are applied: - INSTALL.DPDK.md: CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS step has been removed because it is no longer present in DPDK configuration (combined library is created by default), - INSTALL.DPDK.md: VHost Cuse configuration is updated, - netdev-dpdk.c: Link speed

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

-Original Message- From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmati...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 9:38 AM To: Weglicki, MichalX ; dev@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04. On 04/13/2016

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

On 04/13/2016 11:33 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 04/13/2016 11:16 AM, Weglicki, MichalX wrote: -Original Message- From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmati...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:50 AM To: Weglicki, MichalX ; dev@openvswitch.org Subject:

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

On 04/13/2016 11:16 AM, Weglicki, MichalX wrote: -Original Message- From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmati...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:50 AM To: Weglicki, MichalX ; dev@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

-Original Message- From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmati...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:50 AM To: Weglicki, MichalX ; dev@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04. On 04/12/2016

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK 16.04.

On 04/12/2016 05:05 PM, mweglicx wrote: [...] diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c index e09b471..2295e53 100644 --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c @@ -1740,31 +1740,31 @@ netdev_dpdk_get_features(const struct netdev *netdev_, link = dev->link;

[ovs-dev] [CudaMailTagged] Adding a field in the struct flow

Hi, I want to add a field to the struct flow, and i checked the FAQ 'How do I add support for a new field or header?' but i didn't understand it, what i want to do is add a field in the flow and then when it will be parsed it will call an external function, the field is not in the packet it's just