[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994211#comment-12994211
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-472:
I do not see a reason to rollback the changes. Every
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994179#comment-12994179
]
Jacquelle Leggett commented on OWB-472:
---
I understand Mark's viewpoint, but I do not un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994169#comment-12994169
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-472:
AFAIK, BDA has been enabled as plugin or SPI. Theref
joe told me that there is no impact (per default) and that wasn't correct.
OWB-472 ("optional support for archive centric beans.xml") looks like a new
feature which shouldn't be in the core.
furthermore, the implementation is also improvable.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerh
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18
> My personal fear is that this will quickly lead to lots of follow up failures
> like one can currently see in glassfish and JBossAS.
The concept or the code we have? What failure in the other server
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Gerhard wrote:
> yes - it's non-intrusive because i fixed it.
Non-intrusive in terms of technical rationale to call for a revert,
not non-intrusive in terms of you had to refactor to use trunk in an
appserver.
> however, we have a spi (ScannerService) for such ad
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/13 Mark Struberg
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18
>
> My personal fear is that this will quickly lead to lots o
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18
My personal fear is that this will quickly lead to lots of follow up failures
like one can currently see in glassfish and JBossAS.
For getting this done if e.g. an EE server needs to implement the CDI-1.0 spec
then this can still be provided via a custom S
yes - it's non-intrusive because i fixed it.
however, we have a spi (ScannerService) for such additional features.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/13 Eric C
Isn't the current code pretty non-intrusive and no behavior change by default?
Is there something like a draft to cite that shows what overhaul in
this area is due in 1.1?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark Struberg (JIRA)
Date: Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:40 PM
Subject: [jira] Commen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994151#comment-12994151
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-472:
--
i agree with mark!
> archive centric beans.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994150#comment-12994150
]
Mark Struberg commented on OWB-472:
---
I fear we need to rollback the commits. The problem wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg reassigned OWB-472:
-
Assignee: Mark Struberg (was: Gurkan Erdogdu)
> archive centric beans.xml enabling
> -
13 matches
Mail list logo
